Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04600583
Other study ID # CAMELOT
Secondary ID
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date October 2020
Est. completion date July 2024

Study information

Verified date October 2020
Source Stryker South Pacific
Contact David Fulker, PhD
Phone 94671072
Email david.fulker@stryker.com
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study is a prospective, randomized, longitudinal study of the clinical outcomes of osteoarthritis patients treated by two different alignment philosophies for total knee replacement. All patients will be treated with the same knee system, implanted using MAKO robotic-arm assisted technology.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Not yet recruiting
Enrollment 240
Est. completion date July 2024
Est. primary completion date October 2023
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 40 Years to 80 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - The patient is a male or non-pregnant female between the ages of 40-80 years. - The patient requires a primary total knee replacement and is indicated for robotic-assisted surgery. - Patient is deemed appropriate for a cruciate retaining knee replacement. - The patient has a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA). - The patient has intact collateral ligaments. - The patient is able to undergo CT scanning of the affected limb. - The patient has signed the study specific, ethics-approved, Informed Consent document. - The patient is willing and able to comply with the specified pre-operative and post-operative clinical and radiographic evaluations. Exclusion Criteria: - The patient has a history of total, unicompartmental reconstruction or fusion of the affected joint. - Patient has had a previous osteotomy around the knee. - The patient is morbidly obese (BMI = 40). - The patient has a deformity which will require the use of stems, wedges or augments in conjunction with the Triathlon Total Knee System. - The patient has a varus/valgus deformity = 15°. - The patient has a fixed flexion deformity = 15°. - The patient has a neuromuscular or neurosensory deficiency, which would limit the ability to assess the performance of the device. - The patient has a systemic or metabolic disorder leading to progressive bone deterioration. - The patient is immunologically suppressed or receiving steroids in excess of normal physiological requirements. - Patient has a cognitive impairment, an intellectual disability or a mental illness. - The patient is pregnant. - The patient has metal hardware present in the region of the hip, knee or ankle (as this is known to create geometrical distortion in the region of the implant).

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Triathlon® Total Knee System (Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ USA)
All patients, regardless of the alignment arm they are randomized to will undergo a primary total knee arthroplasty with the Triathlon® Total Knee System using Mako Robotic-Arm Assisted Technology. The surgical intervention will be administered by a physician wherein the expected duration of surgery is approximately 1.5 hours.

Locations

Country Name City State
New Zealand North Shore Hospital Takapuna Auckland

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Stryker South Pacific

Country where clinical trial is conducted

New Zealand, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Joint feeling and Forgotten Joint Score To evaluate differences in joint feeling assessed via the Forgotten Joint Score. This newly-developed 12-item score ranges from 0 to 100 and assesses how aware recipients are of their joint in everyday life. Higher scores indicate a good outcome i.e. a high degree of forgetting the joint. For the purpose of this study a change in score of 14 points for the Forgotten Joint Score has been identified. Pre-operative (2 weeks prior to surgery), Post-operative - 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months (primary timepoint) and 24 months
Secondary Function and Oxford Knee Score To evaluate differences in function between Robotic Assisted Functional Alignment and Robotic Assisted Mechanical Alignment. This will be achieved by employing the following instrument: Oxford Knee Score. This score ranges from 0 to 48 where a higher score indicates a better outcome. Pre-operative (2 weeks prior to surgery), Post-operative - 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Secondary Function and The International Knee Society Score To evaluate differences in function between Robotic Assisted Functional Alignment and Robotic Assisted Mechanical Alignment. This will be achieved by employing the following instrument: The International Knee Society Score. This score ranges from 0 to 100 where a higher score correlates to a better outcome. Pre-operative (2 weeks prior to surgery), Post-operative - 6 weeks, 12 months and 24 months
Secondary Function and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score To evaluate differences in function between Robotic Assisted Functional Alignment and Robotic Assisted Mechanical Alignment. This will be achieved by employing the following instrument: Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. This score ranges from 0 to 100 where 0 indicates the worst possible knee symptoms and 100 signifies no knee symptoms. Pre-operative (2 weeks prior to surgery), Post-operative - 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Secondary Pain and Oxford Knee Score To evaluate differences in pain between Robotic Assisted Functional Alignment and Robotic Assisted Mechanical Alignment. This will be achieved by employing the following instrument: Oxford Knee Score. This score ranges from 0 to 48 where a higher score indicates a better outcome. Pre-operative (2 weeks prior to surgery), Post-operative - 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Secondary Pain and The International Knee Society Score To evaluate differences in pain between Robotic Assisted Functional Alignment and Robotic Assisted Mechanical Alignment. This will be achieved by employing the following instrument: The International Knee Society Score. This score ranges from 0 to 100 where a higher score correlates to a better outcome. Pre-operative (2 weeks prior to surgery), Post-operative - 6 weeks, 12 months and 24 months
Secondary Pain and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score To evaluate differences in pain between Robotic Assisted Functional Alignment and Robotic Assisted Mechanical Alignment. This will be achieved by employing the following instrument: Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. This score ranges from 0 to 100 where 0 indicates the worst possible knee symptoms and 100 signifies no knee symptoms. Pre-operative (2 weeks prior to surgery), Post-operative - 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Secondary Pain and Visual Analogue Scale To evaluate differences in pain between Robotic Assisted Functional Alignment and Robotic Assisted Mechanical Alignment. This will be achieved by employing the following graphic measurement instrument: Visual Analogue Scale. This scale is a continuum between no pain and the worst possible pain imaginable. Pre-operative (2 weeks prior to surgery), Post-operative - 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Secondary Satisfaction and Net Promoter Score To evaluate differences in satisfaction between Robotic Assisted Functional Alignment and Robotic Assisted Mechanical Alignment. This will be achieved by employing the following instrument: Net Promoter. This score ranges from -100 to 100 where the upper end indicates the patient's recommendation of the healthcare they received. Pre-operative (2 weeks prior to surgery), Post-operative - 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Secondary Health related quality of life and Euro-Qol (EQ-5D-3L) To evaluate differences in health-related quality of life between Robotic Assisted Functional Alignment and Robotic Assisted Mechanical Alignment. This will be achieved by employing the following instrument: Euro-Qol (EQ-5D-3L). This score ranges from 0 to 100 where 0 correlates to the worst imaginable health state whilst 100 indicates the best. Pre-operative (2 weeks prior to surgery), Post-operative - 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Secondary Early pain To evaluate differences in early pain (i.e. from in-patient setting to 6-months post operation) between Robotic Assisted Functional Alignment and Robotic Assisted Mechanical Alignment. This objective will be achieved through the use of a patient pain inventory form. In-patient setting (< 5 days post-operation), Post-operative - 6 weeks and 6 months
Secondary Early function To evaluate differences in early function between Robotic Assisted Functional Alignment and Robotic Assisted Mechanical Alignment. This objective will be achieved by utilizing functional tests conducted by physiotherapists. The following functional test will be carried out on the knee joint: Range of motion In-patient setting (< 5 days post-operation)
Secondary Early function To evaluate differences in early function between Robotic Assisted Functional Alignment and Robotic Assisted Mechanical Alignment. This objective will be achieved by utilizing functional tests conducted by physiotherapists. The following functional test will be employed: 9 step stair climb In-patient setting (< 5 days post-operation)
Secondary Early function To evaluate differences in early function between Robotic Assisted Functional Alignment and Robotic Assisted Mechanical Alignment. This objective will be achieved by utilizing functional tests conducted by physiotherapists. The following functional test will be employed: fast paced 10m walk test In-patient setting (< 5 days post-operation)
Secondary Early function To evaluate differences in early function between Robotic Assisted Functional Alignment and Robotic Assisted Mechanical Alignment. This objective will be achieved by utilizing functional tests conducted by physiotherapists. The following functional test will be employed: 30 second chair stand test In-patient setting (< 5 days post-operation)
Secondary Blood loss To compare blood loss between Robotic Assisted Functional Alignment and Robotic Assisted Mechanical Alignment. This objective will be achieved through obtaining surgical data. Intra-operative
Secondary Adjustments to balance To compare adjustments to balance between Robotic Assisted Functional Alignment and Robotic Assisted Mechanical Alignment. This objective will be achieved through obtaining the position from the Robotic system. Intra-operative
Secondary Ability to reach target knee balance as assessed by alignment angles and gaps To compare the ability to achieve soft tissue balance between Robotic Assisted Functional Alignment and Robotic Assisted Mechanical Alignment. This object will be achieved by comparing pre-operative plan and pre-resection gaps with the final surgical plan and implanted gaps as derived from the robotic system. The implant position is defined as the angulation of components and resected bone in each anatomical plane. The soft tissue balance is defined as gaps created in extension and 90° of flexion when stressing the medial compartment (medial collateral ligament) and lateral compartment (lateral collateral ligament). The overall limb alignment is assessed by comparing the Hip-Knee-Ankle angle from pre-operative to 1-year post-operative on a long leg weight bearing x-ray. Pre-operative (2 weeks prior to surgery), intra-operative, Post-operative - 6 weeks, 12 months and 24 months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04657926 - A Trial of APPA in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis Phase 2
Completed NCT02536833 - A Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of SM04690 Injected in the Target Knee Joint of Moderately to Severely Symptomatic Osteoarthritis Subjects Phase 2
Completed NCT03014037 - Comparing Mesenchymal Stem Cell Counts in Unilateral vs. Bilateral Posterior Superior Iliac Spine Bone Marrow Aspiration N/A
Recruiting NCT05937542 - A Qualitative Investigation of CLEAT Participants
Completed NCT03644615 - A Mindfulness Program (MBSR) in the Management of Symptomatic Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis N/A
Recruiting NCT06061367 - Muscles Strength and Gait Parameteres After TKA
Withdrawn NCT04976972 - A Comparison of Patients Receiving a Total Knee Replacement With Robotic Assistance or With Conventional Instrumentation N/A
Completed NCT05496205 - A SAD Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and PK/PD of iN1011-N17 in Healthy Volunteers Phase 1
Completed NCT03850665 - Comparison of Functional Outcome in Patients After Hip Arthroplasty Depending on Surgical Approach N/A
Completed NCT02826902 - Effect of Anesthesia on Quality of Recovery in Patients Undergoing Correctional Tibial Osteotomy - A Randomized Controlled Trial N/A
Completed NCT04402502 - Dynamic 4DCT to Examine Wrist Carpal Mechanics N/A
Completed NCT02923700 - Leukocyte-rich PRP vs Leukocyte-poor PRP for the Treatment of Knee Cartilage Degeneration: a Randomized Controlled Trial Phase 4
Completed NCT04564053 - Study of Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of LNA043 in Japanese Osteoarthritis Participants Phase 1
Completed NCT05070871 - A Clinical Trial Investigating the Effect of Salmon Bone Meal on Osteoarthritis Among Men and Women N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05036174 - Diphenhydramine Ointment for Knee Osteoarthritis N/A
Recruiting NCT02666443 - Low Dose Dexamethasone in Supraclavicular Blocks N/A
Recruiting NCT02912429 - Onlay vs. Inlay Patellofemoral Arthroplasty N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT02723929 - Effects of tDCS and tUS on Pain Perception in OA of the Knee
Withdrawn NCT02921594 - Kinematic Comparison of Vanguard XP and Vanguard CR Total Knee Arthroplasties N/A
Terminated NCT02820766 - Journey II BCS CMS Total Knee System Compared to Other PS Total Knee Systems in PT Setting N/A