Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03503305
Other study ID # OAW-001
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date November 21, 2018
Est. completion date March 31, 2025

Study information

Verified date April 2024
Source InGeneron, Inc.
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, active controlled, single site safety and efficacy study in subjects suffering from chronic wrist osteoarthritis comparing a single ADRC injection generated with the Transpose® RT system into the wrist.


Description:

The focus of this study is to investigate the therapeutic benefit of autologous adipose-derived regenerative cells in patients with wrist arthritis. The hypothesis of this trial is that the use of adult-adipose derived regenerative cells as a treatment of wrist arthritis will induce healing and decrease pain compared to the control group. With adult-adipose derived regenerative cell administration, the medical practitioner would anticipate a reduction in inflammation, acceleration in healing, decreased pain in patients post procedure, and increased function and strength in the affected wrist. Currently, no clinical studies have been constructed to determine the efficacy of ADRCs in wrist arthritis patients. Subjects will fall into two categories: treatment group (20) and control group (20 subjects). The treatment group will undergo a small liposuction procedure and receive wrist osteoarthritis treatment with an ultrasound-guided injection of 5 ml adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) into the wrist. The control group will receive a 5 ml cortisone injection into the wrist.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 40
Est. completion date March 31, 2025
Est. primary completion date December 31, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 75 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. Males and females ages: 18 - 75. 2. Clinical symptoms consistent with wrist osteoarthritis. 3. Diagnosed with wrist osteoarthritis on radiographs. 4. The ability of subjects to give appropriate consent or have a legally authorized representative available. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Subjects who have a documented history or presence of inflammatory arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, severe osteoporosis, sepsis and chondrocalcinosis in the wrist 2. Subjects who have a documented diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. 3. Insufficient amount of subcutaneous tissue to allow recovery of 100ml of lipoaspirate 4. History of systemic malignant or local neoplasms on affected limb within last 5 years 5. Subject is receiving immunosuppressant therapy or has known immunosuppressive or severe autoimmune disease that requires chronic immunosuppressive therapy (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus, systemic lupus erythematosus, etc.) 6. Subjects who have received a corticosteroid injection in the treatment site 7. Subjects on an active regimen of chemotherapy 8. Allergy to sodium citrate of any "caine" type of local anesthetic 9. Subjects pregnant or breast feeding 10. Subject is in the opinion of the Investigator or designee, unable to comply with the requirements of the study protocol or is unsuitable for the study for any reason. This includes completion of patient reported outcome instruments 11. Subjects who have document allergy to radiographic guidance agents. 12. Subject is currently participating in another clinical trial that has not yet completed its primary endpoint 13. History of tobacco use within the last 3 months 14. Subjects with documented with a history of alcohol or drug abuse 15. Subjects who have a documented history of HIV, Hepatitis B, and Hepatitis C 16. Subject is part of a vulnerable population who, in the judgment of the investigator, is unable to give Informed Consent for reasons of incapacity, immaturity, adverse personal circumstances or lack of autonomy. This may include: Individuals with mental disability, persons in nursing homes, children, impoverished persons, persons in emergency situations, homeless persons, nomads, refugees, and those incapable of giving informed consent. Vulnerable populations also may include members of a group with a hierarchical structure such as university students, subordinate hospital and laboratory personnel, employees of the Sponsor, members of the armed forces, and persons kept in detention.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
adipose-derived stem cell injection
5 ml injection of adipose derived stem cells
Drug:
Corticosteroid injection
5 ml injection of corticosteroid

Locations

Country Name City State
United States HD Research Houston Texas
United States Sanford USD Medical Center Sioux Falls South Dakota

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
InGeneron, Inc. Sanford Health

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (3)

Gimble JM, Katz AJ, Bunnell BA. Adipose-derived stem cells for regenerative medicine. Circ Res. 2007 May 11;100(9):1249-60. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000265074.83288.09. — View Citation

Jo CH, Lee YG, Shin WH, Kim H, Chai JW, Jeong EC, Kim JE, Shim H, Shin JS, Shin IS, Ra JC, Oh S, Yoon KS. Intra-articular injection of mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a proof-of-concept clinical trial. Stem Cells. 2014 May;32(5):1254-66. doi: 10.1002/stem.1634. Erratum In: Stem Cells. 2017 Jun;35(6):1651-1652. — View Citation

ter Huurne M, Schelbergen R, Blattes R, Blom A, de Munter W, Grevers LC, Jeanson J, Noel D, Casteilla L, Jorgensen C, van den Berg W, van Lent PL. Antiinflammatory and chondroprotective effects of intraarticular injection of adipose-derived stem cells in experimental osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Nov;64(11):3604-13. doi: 10.1002/art.34626. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Safety - Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Subjects will be monitored for adverse events 12 months
Secondary Efficacy - Change in Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)-pain Scale at All Follow-up Visits Patient outcomes for pain will be recorded (line from 0: no pain to 100:worst pain) 3, 6 and 12 months
Secondary Efficacy - Change in Function Scores on the PROMIS at All Follow-up Visits Patient outcomes for function will be recorded (line from 0:unable to do to 100: without any difficulty) 3, 6 and 12 months
Secondary Efficacy - Change in Function Scores on the QuickDASH at All Follow-up Patient outcomes for function will be recorded (line from 0:no difficulty to 100:unable) 3, 6 and 12 months