Osteoarthritis of the Hip Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Pivotal Study Comparing Two Injections of MONOVISC to Two Injections of Saline in Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Hip
Verified date | November 2021 |
Source | DePuy Mitek |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This study is being done to determine the effectiveness of MONOVISC for the relief of pain and symptoms of osteoarthritis of the hip. Specifically, the study will determine if MONOVISC is more effective than a placebo treatment when delivered as intra-articular injections (injected directly into the hip joint). In this case, the placebo will be a dilute solution of salt water (saline).
Status | Terminated |
Enrollment | 220 |
Est. completion date | June 24, 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | March 15, 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 30 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Male or female = 30 years old - Body Mass Index (BMI) = 35 - Clinical or radiographic diagnosis of hip osteoarthritis in the target hip, with a Kellgren-Lawrence (K/L) grade of 2 or 3. - Walking pain NRS = 4 and = 8. - Willing to discontinue all pain medications (except rescue medication) for 7 days prior to the first study injection and for the duration of the study. - Willing to discontinue rescue medication for 48 hours prior to the first study injection. - Willing to discontinue rescue medication for 48 hours prior to all follow-up visits - Ability to tolerate acetaminophen (e.g. Tylenol). - Must be physically and mentally willing and able to comply with pre and post-treatment scheduled clinical and radiographic evaluations - Must voluntarily sign the Institutional Review Board approved Informed Consent Form. - Must agree not to initiate cannabis therapy during the trial study period. Exclusion Criteria: - Radiographic evidence of osteonecrosis in the target hip - NRS walking pain = 3 the contralateral hip - Clinically diagnosed osteoarthritis in either knee resulting in walking pain greater than NRS 5. - Dependence on external stabilization for walking (e.g. cane, crutches, walker, etc.) - Pain associated with lower back disorders that cannot be differentiated from target hip pain - Major dysplasia or congenital abnormality - Diagnosis of fibromyalgia - Primary inflammatory arthropathy, or any other condition affecting the joint, including rheumatoid arthritis or gout in the target hip - Any musculoskeletal condition that could impede efficacy measurement of the target hip - Any major surgery, arthroplasty, or arthroscopy of the lower extremities in the past 6 months, or planned surgery during the study - Infection of the injection site area - Chronic skin disorders that could interfere with injection site evaluation - Patients with asthma who require systemic use of corticosteroids - Septic arthritis in any joint in the past 12 weeks - For all patients: known hypersensitivity to hyaluronan, lidocaine, or acetaminophen - For patients undergoing fluoroscopic injection guidance: known hypersensitivity to iodine-based fluoroscopic contrast agents, shellfish, or iodine - Intra-articular steroid injection of the target hip within the last 3 months or hyaluronan injection of the target hip within the last 26 weeks - Systemic corticosteroids within the last 12 weeks - Glucosamine and/or chondroitin sulfate within last 4 weeks - Currently on anticoagulation therapy, including aspirin therapy of > 81 mg/day (e.g. one daily "baby aspirin"). - Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. - Pregnant or breast feeding, or plan to be pregnant during the course of the study - Any significant illness (metastasis of any type) that decreases the probability of the subject's survival to the 26 week endpoint - Patients unwilling/unable to complete a pain/function and quality of life questionnaires - Significant trauma to the index hip within 26 weeks of screening - Is receiving workman's compensation, or is currently involved in litigation relating to hip osteoarthritis - Is receiving prescription pain medication for conditions unrelated to hip osteoarthritis - Chronic use of narcotics - Unwilling to return for follow-up visits as described in this protocol - Otherwise determined by the investigator to be medically unsuitable for participation in this study |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | MedSport - University of Michigan | Ann Arbor | Michigan |
United States | Texas Orthopedic Specialists | Bedford | Texas |
United States | Emory Sports Complex | Brookhaven | Georgia |
United States | University of North Carolina | Chapel Hill | North Carolina |
United States | OrthoCarolina Sports Medicine Center | Charlotte | North Carolina |
United States | University of Virginia | Charlottesville | Virginia |
United States | Professional Orthopedics | Cherry Hill | New Jersey |
United States | Denver Hip and Knee | Denver | Colorado |
United States | University of Colorado - Denver | Denver | Colorado |
United States | Iowa Orthopedic Center | Des Moines | Iowa |
United States | CORE Orthopedic Medical Center | Encinitas | California |
United States | Sanford Health | Fargo | North Dakota |
United States | Cleveland Clinic | Garfield Heights | Ohio |
United States | Houston Methodist | Houston | Texas |
United States | Inov8 Orthopaedics | Houston | Texas |
United States | National Sports Medicine Institute | Lansdowne Town Center | Virginia |
United States | OrthoVirginia | Lynchburg | Virginia |
United States | Rothman Institute | Media | Pennsylvania |
United States | Center for Arthritis and Rheumatic Diseases | Miami | Florida |
United States | Columbia Medical Center | New York | New York |
United States | Hospital for Special Surgery | New York | New York |
United States | Sports Medicine North | Peabody | Massachusetts |
United States | Integral Rheumatology & Immunology Specialists | Plantation | Florida |
United States | Eisenhower Medical Center/Desert Orthopedic Center | Rancho Mirage | California |
United States | San Antonio Orthopaedic Group | San Antonio | Texas |
United States | Tucson Orthopedic Institute | Tucson | Arizona |
United States | Southern California Orthopedic Institute | Van Nuys | California |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
DePuy Mitek |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change From Baseline in Walking Pain as Measured by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) A1 Score at Day 180 | The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) is widely used in the evaluation of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis. Walking Pain Score is measured by question A1 on the WOMAC 3.1 Index. The WOMAC questionnaire used in this study was administered in the Numerical rating scale (NRS) format. Question A1 on the WOMAC 3.1 Index measures the amount of pain that a participant has when walking on a flat surface. It is one question that is collected on a scale from 0 to 10 where a score of 0 indicates no pain and a score of 10 indicates extreme pain. | Baseline and Day 180 | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Walking Pain as Measured by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) A1 Score at Day 14, 28, 60 and 120 | The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) is widely used in the evaluation of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis. Walking Pain Score is measured by question A1 on the WOMAC 3.1 Index. The WOMAC questionnaire used in this study was administered in the Numerical rating scale (NRS) format. Question A1 on the WOMAC 3.1 Index measures the amount of pain that a participant has when walking on a flat surface. It is one question that is collected on a scale from 0 to 10 where a score of 0 indicates no pain and a score of 10 indicates extreme pain. | Baseline, Day 14, 28, 60 and 120 |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Withdrawn |
NCT01312285 -
Low Level Magnetic Fields for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Hip
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02102334 -
Validity, Reliability and Reproducibility of Plain Radiographic Measurements After Total Hip Arthroplasty
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02279277 -
Physical Therapy Prior to Total Knee Replacement
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01501955 -
The Metaphyseal Hip Prosthesis - Total Hip
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06211465 -
Cardiovascular And Metabolic Risk After Arthroplasty
|
||
Terminated |
NCT02299271 -
Fascia Iliaca Block for Post-Operative Pain Control After Total Hip Arthroplasty
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02458144 -
Comparison of MIS Anterior Versus MIS Anterolateral Approach
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01807104 -
Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Surgical Techniques Comparing the Direct Anterior Approach to the Posterior Approach
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03382262 -
Study to Compare Exposure of TA Following Administration of FX006 or TAcs in Patients With OA of the Shoulder or Hip
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01795781 -
Assays for and Reversal of New Anticoagulants
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT00449228 -
Efficacy of Preoperative Education and Mini-invasive Surgery for Total Hip Replacement
|
Phase 3 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT00758329 -
Retrospective Data Review of ReCap Total Hip Resurfacing
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT00951145 -
Medium and Long Term Outcome of Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Accolade TMZF Femoral Stem
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02230657 -
A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Same Day Discharge and Overnight Hospital Stay Among Total Hip Arthroplasties Done by the Direct Anterior Approach
|
N/A |