Osteoarthritis, Knee Clinical Trial
— FFLEXOfficial title:
Safety and Performance of FibroFix™ Cartilage P Implant and Drill Set for Articular Cartilage Repair Within the Knee Joint
Verified date | July 2023 |
Source | Orthox Limited |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This is a multi-center first-in-human prospective clinical investigation to evaluate the safety and performance of the FibroFix™ Cartilage P Implant and Drill Set. The Implant is a medical device designed by Orthox Ltd. to repair a damaged area of cartilage within the knee joint. The aim is to 75 participants over two Stages: In STAGE I, up to a total of 6 subjects will be recruited and safety assessed after 6 months of follow-up. In Stage II an additional 69 subjects. The subjects will be followed up for 2 years with MRI imaging, then a further 8 years with patient outcome questionnaires.
Status | Terminated |
Enrollment | 2 |
Est. completion date | July 7, 2023 |
Est. primary completion date | July 7, 2023 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patient is able to provide written informed consent; 2. Age =18 years at time of enrolment; 3. Able to comply with the protocol-defined pre-operative procedures, the post-operative clinical and imaging evaluations and the recommended rehabilitation regimen as determined by the Investigator; 4. Has a joint surface lesion, ICRS Grade 3 or above, on femoral condyles; 5. Female subjects of child-bearing potential: a negative urine pregnancy test at time of enrolment. 6. Patient has been diagnosed by MRI or other imaging technique to confirm presence of cartilage lesion and the lesion remains symptomatic. Only patients for whom the decision to perform surgery has already been made will be invited to participate. Asymptomatic lesions will NOT be included; Intra-Operative Inclusion criterion: 7. Lesion area of less than of 26.6 mm height and less than 20.0 mm width in the index knee after debridement. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Age >65 years or <18 years at time of enrolment; 2. Body Mass Index (BMI) > 35; 3. Lesion area of more than 26.6 mm length and more than 20.0 mm width in the index knee after debridement; 4. Patient has multiple lesions to be treated; 5. Articular cartilage lesions in the tibia or patella, ICRS grades 3 and above; 6. KOOS Pain Subscale score at baseline that is < 20 or > 65. (Scale range: Maximum pain = 0, pain free = 100); 7. Patient has previously received the FibroFix™ Cartilage P implant; 8. Patient suffers from any medical condition that would hinder cartilage repair, such as additional unresolved comorbidities related to the index knee; 1. Clinically significant untreated ligament instability of the same knee, 2. Patient is post op from surgery on the same knee within 6 months which stipulates on-going rehabilitation, 3. Untreated, symptomatic, unstable meniscal lesions on patients with residual meniscus volume of <50% in the same compartment, 4. Joint malalignment that in the opinion of the treating surgeon, requires osteotomy to correct, 5. Any previous surgical cartilage treatment in the index knee within the previous 6 months, 6. Evidence of osteonecrosis of the involved knee. 9. A known allergy to: 1. General and/or regional anaesthetic, 2. Silk or silk containing products, or 3. Glycerol or products containing glycerol. 10. Demonstrating an active local or systemic infection; 11. Any condition, which in the judgment of the Investigator would preclude adequate evaluation of the FibroFix™ Cartilage P implant and clinical outcome; 12. A history of confirmed anaphylactoid reaction; 13. Has received local administration of any type of corticosteroid or systemic administration of antineoplastic, immunostimulating, or immunosuppressive agents within 180 days prior to the scheduled surgery; 14. Medical history that includes a confirmed diagnosis of rheumatoid or inflammatory arthritis, or relapsing polychondritis; 15. If female and of child-bearing potential: evidence of a positive pregnancy test or a stated intention to become pregnant in the next 6 months at time of enrolment; 16. Currently participating in another device or drug clinical investigation or has done so in the previous 3 months which would impact the results of the surgery in the opinion of the surgeon or be a barrier to participation. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Hungary | Menta Egészségközpont | Budapest | |
United Kingdom | North Bristol NHS Trust | Bristol |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Orthox Limited | Avania B.V. |
Hungary, United Kingdom,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change in Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score (KOOS) - year 1(Pain and Sport/Rec only) | The knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score is a patient-assessed outcome score. Questions use a 5-point Likert scale response. KOOS is scored into 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Sport and Recreation Function (Sport/Rec), and knee-related quality of life (QoL). Each subscale ranges from 0 indicating extreme symptoms to 100 indicating no symptoms. Subscale scores will be aggregated and averaged as a primary outcome.
Change from baseline of 8 points in KOOS Pain scores and Function (Sport/Rec) scores at 1-year post-surgery. |
baseline (pre-surgery) to 1 year after surgery | |
Primary | Safety endpoint - year 1 | Incidence of device related Adverse Events | up to year 1 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in KOOS -week 6 | Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score is a patient assessed outcome score. Questions use a 5 point Likert scale response. KOOS is scored into 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Sport and Recreation Function (Sport/Rec) and knee-related quality of life (QoL). Each subscale ranges from 0 indicating extreme symptoms to 100 indicating no symptoms. Subscale scores will be aggregated and averaged as a primary outcome. The primary analysis repeated measures mixed model will be used to obtain estimates for additional time points as secondary objectives. Changes from baseline of mean subscale scores plotted over time to visualise change. | baseline (pre-surgery) to week 6 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in KOOS -month 3 | Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score is a patient assessed outcome score. Questions use a 5 point Likert scale response. KOOS is scored into 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Sport and Recreation Function (Sport/Rec) and knee-related quality of life (QoL). Each subscale ranges from 0 indicating extreme symptoms to 100 indicating no symptoms. Subscale scores will be aggregated and averaged as a primary outcome. The primary analysis repeated measures mixed model will be used to obtain estimates for additional time points as secondary objectives. Changes from baseline of mean subscale scores plotted over time to visualise change. | baseline (pre-surgery) to month 3 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in KOOS -month 6 | Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score is a patient assessed outcome score. Questions use a 5 point Likert scale response. KOOS is scored into 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Sport and Recreation Function (Sport/Rec) and knee-related quality of life (QoL). Each subscale ranges from 0 indicating extreme symptoms to 100 indicating no symptoms. Subscale scores will be aggregated and averaged as a primary outcome. The primary analysis repeated measures mixed model will be used to obtain estimates for additional time points as secondary objectives. Changes from baseline of mean subscale scores plotted over time to visualise change. | baseline (pre-surgery) to month 6 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in KOOS -year 1 | Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score is a patient assessed outcome score. Questions use a 5 point Likert scale response. KOOS is scored into 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Sport and Recreation Function (Sport/Rec) and knee-related quality of life (QoL). Each subscale ranges from 0 indicating extreme symptoms to 100 indicating no symptoms. Subscale scores will be aggregated and averaged as a primary outcome. The primary analysis repeated measures mixed model will be used to obtain estimates for additional time points as secondary objectives. Changes from baseline of mean subscale scores plotted over time to visualise change. | baseline (pre-surgery) to year 1 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in KOOS -year 2 | Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score is a patient assessed outcome score. Questions use a 5 point Likert scale response. KOOS is scored into 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Sport and Recreation Function (Sport/Rec) and knee-related quality of life (QoL). Each subscale ranges from 0 indicating extreme symptoms to 100 indicating no symptoms. Subscale scores will be aggregated and averaged as a primary outcome. The primary analysis repeated measures mixed model will be used to obtain estimates for additional time points as secondary objectives. Changes from baseline of mean subscale scores plotted over time to visualise change. | baseline (pre-surgery) to year 2 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in KOOS -year 3 | Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score is a patient assessed outcome score. Questions use a 5 point Likert scale response. KOOS is scored into 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Sport and Recreation Function (Sport/Rec) and knee-related quality of life (QoL). Each subscale ranges from 0 indicating extreme symptoms to 100 indicating no symptoms. Subscale scores will be aggregated and averaged as a primary outcome. The primary analysis repeated measures mixed model will be used to obtain estimates for additional time points as secondary objectives. Changes from baseline of mean subscale scores plotted over time to visualise change. | baseline (pre-surgery) to year 3 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in KOOS -year 4 | Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score is a patient assessed outcome score. Questions use a 5 point Likert scale response. KOOS is scored into 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Sport and Recreation Function (Sport/Rec) and knee-related quality of life (QoL). Each subscale ranges from 0 indicating extreme symptoms to 100 indicating no symptoms. Subscale scores will be aggregated and averaged as a primary outcome. The primary analysis repeated measures mixed model will be used to obtain estimates for additional time points as secondary objectives. Changes from baseline of mean subscale scores plotted over time to visualise change. | baseline (pre-surgery) to year 4 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in KOOS -year 5 | Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score is a patient assessed outcome score. Questions use a 5 point Likert scale response. KOOS is scored into 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Sport and Recreation Function (Sport/Rec) and knee-related quality of life (QoL). Each subscale ranges from 0 indicating extreme symptoms to 100 indicating no symptoms. Subscale scores will be aggregated and averaged as a primary outcome. The primary analysis repeated measures mixed model will be used to obtain estimates for additional time points as secondary objectives. Changes from baseline of mean subscale scores plotted over time to visualise change. | baseline (pre-surgery) to year 5 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in KOOS -year 6 | Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score is a patient assessed outcome score. Questions use a 5 point Likert scale response. KOOS is scored into 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Sport and Recreation Function (Sport/Rec) and knee-related quality of life (QoL). Each subscale ranges from 0 indicating extreme symptoms to 100 indicating no symptoms. Subscale scores will be aggregated and averaged as a primary outcome. The primary analysis repeated measures mixed model will be used to obtain estimates for additional time points as secondary objectives. Changes from baseline of mean subscale scores plotted over time to visualise change. | baseline (pre-surgery) to year 6 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in KOOS -year 7 | Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score is a patient assessed outcome score. Questions use a 5 point Likert scale response. KOOS is scored into 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Sport and Recreation Function (Sport/Rec) and knee-related quality of life (QoL). Each subscale ranges from 0 indicating extreme symptoms to 100 indicating no symptoms. Subscale scores will be aggregated and averaged as a primary outcome. The primary analysis repeated measures mixed model will be used to obtain estimates for additional time points as secondary objectives. Changes from baseline of mean subscale scores plotted over time to visualise change. | baseline (pre-surgery) to year 7 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in KOOS -year 8 | Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score is a patient assessed outcome score. Questions use a 5 point Likert scale response. KOOS is scored into 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Sport and Recreation Function (Sport/Rec) and knee-related quality of life (QoL). Each subscale ranges from 0 indicating extreme symptoms to 100 indicating no symptoms. Subscale scores will be aggregated and averaged as a primary outcome. The primary analysis repeated measures mixed model will be used to obtain estimates for additional time points as secondary objectives. Changes from baseline of mean subscale scores plotted over time to visualise change. | baseline (pre-surgery) to year 8 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in KOOS -year 9 | Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score is a patient assessed outcome score. Questions use a 5 point Likert scale response. KOOS is scored into 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Sport and Recreation Function (Sport/Rec) and knee-related quality of life (QoL). Each subscale ranges from 0 indicating extreme symptoms to 100 indicating no symptoms. Subscale scores will be aggregated and averaged as a primary outcome. The primary analysis repeated measures mixed model will be used to obtain estimates for additional time points as secondary objectives. Changes from baseline of mean subscale scores plotted over time to visualise change. | baseline (pre-surgery) to year 9 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in KOOS - year 10 | Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score is a patient assessed outcome score. Questions use a 5 point Likert scale response. KOOS is scored into 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Sport and Recreation Function (Sport/Rec) and knee-related quality of life (QoL). Each subscale ranges from 0 indicating extreme symptoms to 100 indicating no symptoms. Subscale scores will be aggregated and averaged as a primary outcome. The primary analysis repeated measures mixed model will be used to obtain estimates for additional time points as secondary objectives. Changes from baseline of mean subscale scores plotted over time to visualise change. | baseline (pre-surgery) to year 10 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in Lysholm knee score -week 2 | Change from baseline as measured by the Lysholm knee score. The Lysholm knee score is a condition-specific outcome measure that contains eight domains: limp, locking, pain, stair-climbing, use of supports, instability, swelling, and squatting. An overall score of 0 to 100 points is calculated, with 95 to 100 points indicating an excellent outcome; 84 to 94 points, a good outcome; 65 to 83 points, a fair outcome; and <65 points, a poor outcome. | baseline (pre-surgery) to week 2 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in Lysholm knee score -week 6 | Change from baseline as measured by the Lysholm knee score. The Lysholm knee score is a condition-specific outcome measure that contains eight domains: limp, locking, pain, stair-climbing, use of supports, instability, swelling, and squatting. An overall score of 0 to 100 points is calculated, with 95 to 100 points indicating an excellent outcome; 84 to 94 points, a good outcome; 65 to 83 points, a fair outcome; and <65 points, a poor outcome. | baseline (pre-surgery) to week 6 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in Lysholm knee score -month 3 | Change from baseline as measured by the Lysholm knee score. The Lysholm knee score is a condition-specific outcome measure that contains eight domains: limp, locking, pain, stair-climbing, use of supports, instability, swelling, and squatting. An overall score of 0 to 100 points is calculated, with 95 to 100 points indicating an excellent outcome; 84 to 94 points, a good outcome; 65 to 83 points, a fair outcome; and <65 points, a poor outcome. | baseline (pre-surgery) to month 3 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in Lysholm knee score -month 6 | Change from baseline as measured by the Lysholm knee score. The Lysholm knee score is a condition-specific outcome measure that contains eight domains: limp, locking, pain, stair-climbing, use of supports, instability, swelling, and squatting. An overall score of 0 to 100 points is calculated, with 95 to 100 points indicating an excellent outcome; 84 to 94 points, a good outcome; 65 to 83 points, a fair outcome; and <65 points, a poor outcome. | baseline (pre-surgery) to month 6 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in Lysholm knee score -year 1 | Change from baseline as measured by the Lysholm knee score. The Lysholm knee score is a condition-specific outcome measure that contains eight domains: limp, locking, pain, stair-climbing, use of supports, instability, swelling, and squatting. An overall score of 0 to 100 points is calculated, with 95 to 100 points indicating an excellent outcome; 84 to 94 points, a good outcome; 65 to 83 points, a fair outcome; and <65 points, a poor outcome. | baseline (pre-surgery) to year 1 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in Lysholm knee score -year 2 | Change from baseline as measured by the Lysholm knee score. The Lysholm knee score is a condition-specific outcome measure that contains eight domains: limp, locking, pain, stair-climbing, use of supports, instability, swelling, and squatting. An overall score of 0 to 100 points is calculated, with 95 to 100 points indicating an excellent outcome; 84 to 94 points, a good outcome; 65 to 83 points, a fair outcome; and <65 points, a poor outcome. | baseline (pre-surgery) to year 2 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in Tegner Activity Scale -week 2 | Change from baseline as measured by the Tegner Activity scale. The Tegner Activity scale contains 11 assessments based on the following domains: competitive sports, recreational sports, work and sick leave. The Tegner activity scale is a one-item score that grades activity based on work and sports activities on a scale of 0 to 10. Zero represents disability because of knee problems and 10 represents national or international level soccer. | baseline (pre-surgery) to week 2 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in Tegner Activity Scale -week 6 | Change from baseline as measured by the Tegner Activity scale. The Tegner Activity scale contains 11 assessments based on the following domains: competitive sports, recreational sports, work and sick leave. The Tegner activity scale is a one-item score that grades activity based on work and sports activities on a scale of 0 to 10. Zero represents disability because of knee problems and 10 represents national or international level soccer. | baseline (pre-surgery) to week 6 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in Tegner Activity Scale -month 3 | Change from baseline as measured by the Tegner Activity scale. The Tegner Activity scale contains 11 assessments based on the following domains: competitive sports, recreational sports, work and sick leave. The Tegner activity scale is a one-item score that grades activity based on work and sports activities on a scale of 0 to 10. Zero represents disability because of knee problems and 10 represents national or international level soccer. | baseline (pre-surgery) to month 3 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in Tegner Activity Scale -month 6 | Change from baseline as measured by the Tegner Activity scale. The Tegner Activity scale contains 11 assessments based on the following domains: competitive sports, recreational sports, work and sick leave. The Tegner activity scale is a one-item score that grades activity based on work and sports activities on a scale of 0 to 10. Zero represents disability because of knee problems and 10 represents national or international level soccer. | baseline (pre-surgery) to month 6 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in Tegner Activity Scale -year 1 | Change from baseline as measured by the Tegner Activity scale. The Tegner Activity scale contains 11 assessments based on the following domains: competitive sports, recreational sports, work and sick leave. The Tegner activity scale is a one-item score that grades activity based on work and sports activities on a scale of 0 to 10. Zero represents disability because of knee problems and 10 represents national or international level soccer. | baseline (pre-surgery) to year 1 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in Tegner Activity Scale -year 2 | Change from baseline as measured by the Tegner Activity scale. The Tegner Activity scale contains 11 assessments based on the following domains: competitive sports, recreational sports, work and sick leave. The Tegner activity scale is a one-item score that grades activity based on work and sports activities on a scale of 0 to 10. Zero represents disability because of knee problems and 10 represents national or international level soccer. | baseline (pre-surgery) to year 2 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in Visual Analogue Score (VAS) - week 2 | Visual Analogue Score - patient assessed pain level where 0 = no pain to 100 = worst imaginable pain. The patient is asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represents their pain intensity. The measurement from 0 to the line provides a score in the range 0-100mm, with higher scores indicating worse pain. Patients are asked about their current pain or pain intensity in the last 24 hours. | baseline (pre-surgery) to week 2 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in Visual Analogue Score (VAS) - week 6 | Visual Analogue Score - patient assessed pain level where 0 = no pain to 100 = worst imaginable pain. The patient is asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represents their pain intensity. The measurement from 0 to the line provides a score in the range 0-100mm, with higher scores indicating worse pain. Patients are asked about their current pain or pain intensity in the last 24 hours. | baseline (pre-surgery) to week 6 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in Visual Analogue Score (VAS) - month 3 | Visual Analogue Score - patient assessed pain level where 0 = no pain to 100 = worst imaginable pain. The patient is asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represents their pain intensity. The measurement from 0 to the line provides a score in the range 0-100mm, with higher scores indicating worse pain. Patients are asked about their current pain or pain intensity in the last 24 hours. | baseline (pre-surgery) to month 3 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in Visual Analogue Score (VAS) - month 6 | Visual Analogue Score - patient assessed pain level where 0 = no pain to 100 = worst imaginable pain. The patient is asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represents their pain intensity. The measurement from 0 to the line provides a score in the range 0-100mm, with higher scores indicating worse pain. Patients are asked about their current pain or pain intensity in the last 24 hours. | baseline (pre-surgery) to month 6 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in Visual Analogue Score (VAS) - year 1 | Visual Analogue Score - patient assessed pain level where 0 = no pain to 100 = worst imaginable pain. The patient is asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represents their pain intensity. The measurement from 0 to the line provides a score in the range 0-100mm, with higher scores indicating worse pain. Patients are asked about their current pain or pain intensity in the last 24 hours. | baseline (pre-surgery) to year 1 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in Visual Analogue Score (VAS) - year 2 | Visual Analogue Score - patient assessed pain level where 0 = no pain to 100 = worst imaginable pain. The patient is asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represents their pain intensity. The measurement from 0 to the line provides a score in the range 0-100mm, with higher scores indicating worse pain. Patients are asked about their current pain or pain intensity in the last 24 hours. | baseline (pre-surgery) to year 2 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in EQ-5D-5L -month 6 | Change from baseline in the EQ-5D-5L score. The EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) score is a standardised measure of health status developed by the EuroQol Group to provide a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. | baseline (pre-surgery) to month 6 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in EQ-5D-5L -year 1 | Change from baseline in the EQ-5D-5L score. The EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) score is a standardised measure of health status developed by the EuroQol Group to provide a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. | baseline (pre-surgery) to year 1 after surgery | |
Secondary | Change in EQ-5D-5L -year 1 | Change from baseline in the EQ-5D-5L score. The EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) score is a standardised measure of health status developed by the EuroQol Group to provide a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. | baseline (pre-surgery) to year 2 after surgery | |
Secondary | Magnetic Resonance Imaging -month 3 | MRI evaluation of implantation. These scans will allow the assessment of the integrity of the intra-articular structures, the FibroFix™ Cartilage P implant and its integration. | baseline (pre-surgery) to month 3 after surgery | |
Secondary | Magnetic Resonance Imaging -month 6 | MRI evaluation of implantation. These scans will allow the assessment of the integrity of the intra-articular structures, the FibroFix™ Cartilage P implant and its integration. | baseline (pre-surgery) to month 6 after surgery | |
Secondary | Magnetic Resonance Imaging -year 1 | MRI evaluation of implantation. These scans will allow the assessment of the integrity of the intra-articular structures, the FibroFix™ Cartilage P implant and its integration. | baseline (pre-surgery) to year 1 after surgery | |
Secondary | Magnetic Resonance Imaging -year 2 | MRI evaluation of implantation. These scans will allow the assessment of the integrity of the intra-articular structures, the FibroFix™ Cartilage P implant and its integration. | baseline (pre-surgery) to year 2 after surgery | |
Secondary | Usability Questionnaire - Surgeons and Theatre nurses | A usability questionnaire will be completed after performing the surgery to assess their opinion of using the FibroFix Cartilage P implant and Drill set by surgeons and theatre nurses.
The data collected may be from open questions or using Likert scales to determine the strength of opinion. Analysis of the data collected during the formative evaluations and summative testing will be presented in the form of descriptive summaries, diagrammatic form (e.g., bar charts or histograms), and simple computation calculations such as means, standard deviations where possible, ranges of results, or percentages (e.g., percentage of people that thought…). |
immediately post-surgery | |
Secondary | Usability Questionnaire - Processing staff | A usability questionnaire will be completed by the processing staff after processing (cleaning and sterilizing) the Drill set (instrumentation used to prepare the implant site during surgery) to assess their opinion of the ease of cleaning and sterilizing the instruments.
The data collected may be from open questions or using Likert scales to determine the strength of opinion. Analysis of the data collected during the formative evaluations and summative testing will be presented in the form of descriptive summaries, diagrammatic form (e.g., bar charts or histograms), and simple computation calculations such as means, standard deviations where possible, ranges of results, or percentages (e.g., percentage of people that thought…). |
after processing of instruments | |
Secondary | Usability Questionnaire - Patients | A usability questionnaire will be completed by the Patients after being given the implant card and related patient leaflet after surgery and before discharge to assess their opinion of the ease of understanding of the material given to them.
The data collected may be from open questions or using Likert scales to determine the strength of opinion. Analysis of the data collected during the formative evaluations and summative testing will be presented in the form of descriptive summaries, diagrammatic form (e.g., bar charts or histograms), and simple computation calculations such as means, standard deviations where possible, ranges of results, or percentages (e.g., percentage of people that thought…). |
pre-discharge from hospital | |
Secondary | Safety endpoint - month 3 | Cumulative incidence of device-related Adverse Events | up to month 3 after surgery | |
Secondary | Safety endpoint - month 6 | Cumulative incidence of device related Adverse Events | up to month 6 after surgery | |
Secondary | Safety endpoint -year 2 | Cumulative incidence of device related Adverse Events | up to year 2 after surgery | |
Secondary | Safety endpoint -year 3 | Cumulative incidence of device related Adverse Events | up to year 3 after surgery | |
Secondary | Safety endpoint -year 4 | Cumulative incidence of device related Adverse Events | up to year 4 after surgery | |
Secondary | Safety endpoint -year 5 | Cumulative incidence of device related Adverse Events | up to year 5 after surgery | |
Secondary | Safety endpoint -year 6 | Cumulative incidence of device related Adverse Events | up to year 6 after surgery | |
Secondary | Safety endpoint -year 7 | Cumulative incidence of device related Adverse Events | up to year 7 after surgery | |
Secondary | Safety endpoint -year 8 | Cumulative incidence of device related Adverse Events | up to year 8 after surgery | |
Secondary | Safety endpoint -year 9 | Cumulative incidence of device related Adverse Events | up to year 9 after surgery | |
Secondary | Safety endpoint -year 10 | Cumulative incidence of device related Adverse Events | up to year 10 after surgery |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT03895489 -
Effectiveness of the Journey Total Knee Arthroplasty Versus Two Standard of Care Total Knee Arthroplasty Prostheses
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03660943 -
A Clinical Study to Test Efficacy and Safety of Repeat Doses of CNTX-4975-05 in Patients With Osteoarthritis Knee Pain
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04531969 -
Comparison of Outpatient and Inpatient Spa Therapy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02848027 -
Correlating the Osteoarthritic Knee Microenvironment to Clinical Outcome After Treatment With Regenexx®SD Treatment
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05160246 -
The Instant Effect of Kinesiology Taping in Patients With Knee OA
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06080763 -
Biomechanics and Clinical Outcomes in Responders and Non-Responders
|
||
Completed |
NCT03643588 -
The Comparison of HYAJOINT Plus and Hyalgan Hyaluronan Supplement for Knee Osteoarthritis Pain
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05100225 -
Efficacy and Safety Trial of PTP-001 (MOTYS) for Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04061733 -
New Hydroxyethyl Cellulose Hydrogel for the Treatment of the Pain of Knee Arthrosis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04051489 -
A Novel Smartphone Application for "Smart" Knee Osteoarthritis Trials
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05546541 -
Epidemiology and Nutrition
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05447767 -
Prediction AlgoriThm for regeneraTive Medicine Approach in knEe OA: New Decision-making Process Based on Patient pRofiliNg
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04448106 -
Autologous Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (AdMSCs) for Osteoarthritis
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03225911 -
Effect of a Lateral Wedge Insole and Simple Knee Sleeve in Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05070871 -
A Clinical Trial Investigating the Effect of Salmon Bone Meal on Osteoarthritis Among Men and Women
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05703087 -
Positive Cueing in Knee Arthroplasty.
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06042426 -
Effects of Perioperative Intravenous Dexamethasone in Clinical Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty in a Hispanic Population
|
Phase 4 | |
Terminated |
NCT02615522 -
Prospective Post Market Clinical Follow-Up of the Primary Knee Endoprosthesis BPK-S Integration
|
||
Completed |
NCT02944448 -
A Study Evaluating Pain Relief and Safety of Orally Administered CR845 in Patients With Osteoarthritis of Hip or Knee
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02901964 -
Effect of Strengthening the Hip Abductor in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: Randomized Controlled Trial
|
N/A |