View clinical trials related to Orthodontics.
Filter by:Orthodontic treatment extends over a longer period of time. lt takes months or rather years and it is no short-term treatment. The current literature does not answer the question of patients' expectations on aligner treatment and patients' experiences during aligner therapy sufficiently. Therefore, it is clinically and ethically highly relevant to know answers to these questions. This knowledge can highly improve the orthodontic consultation and therapy as well as the patients' comfort and wellbeing during the therapy. The proposed questionnaire-based interview survey is anticipated as a two-vear study. In the first year study patients' expectations and preferences before the aligner treatment with Invisalign® aligners will be evaluated as well as preliminary changes in quality of life during the first stages of the Invisalign® aligner treatment. In the second year study it is planned to continue with the time equivalent questionnaires of the first year study and to investigate the patients' expectations, patients' experiences and levels of quality of life during and after aligner treatment. Therefore, it is planned to enroll 55 patients in this multicentre questionnaire-based interview survey. Two different questionnaires will be handed out to the patients. The first questionnaire, the aligner questionnaire, collects information from three different time points regarding the patients' expectations, preferences, experiences and views on second opinion concerning the aligner treatment. The results of those three time points, i.e. first (Ta0 before treatment begin), second (Ta6Mo, after 6 months of treatment) and third (Ta final, after finishing the treatment) will be statistically described and compared over time. We expect most questionnaires of the second (during aligner treatment) and third time points (after finishing of treatment) to be evaluated by the end of the second year (second-year study), as the average treatment duration is about two years. The aim of the second questionnaire (OHlP 14) is to find out the changes in quality of life and is scheduled be started already in the firsfyear study. This questionnaire will be handed out to the patients before the treatment begins (Tq0), at the first check-up after the beginning of the treatment (TqCo1) and semi-annually afterwards (Tq6Mo' Tq12Mo, Tq18Mo, Tq24Mo, Tq30Mo) and finally at the end of the treatment (Tq final).
The use of corticotomy surgery in addition to orthodontic standard treatment could accelerate the treatment. Corticotomy involves vertical interdental incisions of the gingiva and the bone with a very low thickness. Orthodontic appliances are placed immediately after the surgery. This study aims to compare the tooth movement when correcting mandibular dental crowding in two groups of patients: Test group: orthodontic treatment and minimally invasive corticotomy surgery. Control group: standard orthodontic treatment without surgery.
Introduction The study aimed to investigate the effects of micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) on the changes in mandibular bone volume fraction (Bone Volume/Total Volume, BV/TV), in relation to the MOP effects on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement, using CBCT images. The other objective was to evaluate the effects of different frequency intervals (4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks) of MOPs on mandibular bone volume fraction (BV/TV), in relation to the rate of tooth movement. Methods In 24 participants, orthodontic force of 140-200 grams was applied for mandibular canine retraction. Three micro-osteoperforations (MOP's) were made according to the scheduled intervals of the three different groups (4, 8 and 12 weeks) directly at the mandibular buccal cortical bone of extracted first premolars sites. At the 12th week following MOP application, CBCT scans were performed. CT Analyser software was used to compute trabecular alveolar bone volume fraction (BV/TV).
The aim of the study is to evaluate the effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on patients with chronic periodontitis during a post-orthodontic period for 12 months. Following aspects will be assessed: 1. Effects on tooth stability maintenance and bone remodeling. 2. Effects on periodontal inflammation status. 3. Effects on cervical dentin sensitivity and quality of life. The study design is a randomised controlled trail. To eliminate any bias, the investigator will initially hypothesis there is no significant difference in the aforementioned aspects between teeth retained with an adjunctive LLLT strategy and those retained in a conventional regimen.
Evaluation of the effects of the implementation of a new finishing protocol in orthodontics patients
The current study Is a split-mouth Randomized Controlled Trial that was performed to investigate three dimensionally, using digital models and Cone Beam Computed Tomography imaging, the effect of micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) on the rate of tooth movement in a canine retraction model.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the Aerodentis System for orthodontic tooth movement in an open label, two-arms, non-inferiority clinical study. This open-label, two-arm study will follow 45 patients for up to fifteen months. Thirty participants will wear the Aerodentis device, and fifteen participants will wear Invisalign, a commonly used clear appliance. Patients will be assigned to participate in the treatment group using the Aerodentis device at home for 10 hours daily or in the control group using clear correctors for the duration of up to 15 months. Outcome assessments will be performed every 4 weeks. Assessments will include tooth movement and quality of life assessments.
Orthodontic relapse occurs in almost 80% of Orthodontic Treatment. The only prevention to phenomenon is the use of fixed retainers or life time active retention. Unfortunately, patients do not comply and after a year of treatment, many stop wearing their retainers and Orthodontic relapse occurs. The aim of this project is to prospectively analyze the treatment result of consecutive treated patients who have had active orthodontic relapse. 20 patients will be recruited through advertisement to the Department of Orthodontics at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB). The sample will comprise of 20 patients with Class I malocclusions. The records to be collected will comprise of clinical pictures and pre and post study casts. The 3D study casts will be evaluated using the Little's Index. The results will be analyzed with the paired t-test and ANOVA, using the Statistical Analysis System (SAS/STAT®) software.
This study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of digital models obtained via 10 digitization techniques to the reference standard of orthodontic plaster model through dental measurements
The purpose of this trial is to evaluate and compare stability after orthodontic treatment with an Essix retainer and a bonded cuspid-to-cuspid retainer (CTC), respectively in the mandibular arch and longitudinally follow these patients over time up to 5 years. The patients' perceptions of the two methods are also evaluated with questionnaires during the follow-up period. A further aim of this study is to analyze the relationship between diagnosis, treatment outcome, treatment time, age at start of treatment and stability with an Essix retainer in the maxilla. The null hypotheses are: - that there is no difference in retention capacity between Essix retainer and cuspid-to-cuspid retainer - that there is no difference in patients' perception between Essix retainer and cuspid-to-cuspid retainer - that there is no difference in retention capacity for Essix retainer in the maxilla concerning diagnosis before treatment, treatment outcomes, treatment time and age at start of treatment