View clinical trials related to Orthodontic Appliances.
Filter by:Class II malocclusion with excessive overjet is one of the most common malocclusions among children and adolescents. The overall goal of the project is to analyze orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusion with excessive overjet when the treatment is started in different ages and treated with removable and/or fixed appliance. Treatment initiated before the age of eleven is performed with a removable functional appliance, Headgear Activator (HGA). Treatment starting in early adolescence is performed with fixed orthodontic appliance (FA). The hypotheses are: - Treatment with HGA at the age of nine or eleven is effective. No spontaneous correction of the malocclusion is expected in the untreated control group. - Patient experience, treatment effect and cost-effectiveness are equivalent whether the treatment with HGA is initiated at the age of nine or eleven. - Treatment results, patient experience and treatment- and cost-effectiveness are equivalent whether treatment is initiated early with HGA or initiated in early adolescence with FA. - The treatment of Class II malocclusion with excessive overjet renders long-term treatment stability and patient satisfaction.
To describe a method of acid etching the base of a bracket, and to compare the bond failures between micro-abrasive blasted (sandblasted) brackets and acid etched brackets over an eighteen month period
The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effect of myofunctional trainer T4K versus twin block functional appliance on the dentoalveolar changes in children with class II division I malocclusion
Orthodontic treatment extends over a longer period of time. lt takes months or rather years and it is no short-term treatment. The current literature does not answer the question of patients' expectations on aligner treatment and patients' experiences during aligner therapy sufficiently. Therefore, it is clinically and ethically highly relevant to know answers to these questions. This knowledge can highly improve the orthodontic consultation and therapy as well as the patients' comfort and wellbeing during the therapy. The proposed questionnaire-based interview survey is anticipated as a two-vear study. In the first year study patients' expectations and preferences before the aligner treatment with Invisalign® aligners will be evaluated as well as preliminary changes in quality of life during the first stages of the Invisalign® aligner treatment. In the second year study it is planned to continue with the time equivalent questionnaires of the first year study and to investigate the patients' expectations, patients' experiences and levels of quality of life during and after aligner treatment. Therefore, it is planned to enroll 55 patients in this multicentre questionnaire-based interview survey. Two different questionnaires will be handed out to the patients. The first questionnaire, the aligner questionnaire, collects information from three different time points regarding the patients' expectations, preferences, experiences and views on second opinion concerning the aligner treatment. The results of those three time points, i.e. first (Ta0 before treatment begin), second (Ta6Mo, after 6 months of treatment) and third (Ta final, after finishing the treatment) will be statistically described and compared over time. We expect most questionnaires of the second (during aligner treatment) and third time points (after finishing of treatment) to be evaluated by the end of the second year (second-year study), as the average treatment duration is about two years. The aim of the second questionnaire (OHlP 14) is to find out the changes in quality of life and is scheduled be started already in the firsfyear study. This questionnaire will be handed out to the patients before the treatment begins (Tq0), at the first check-up after the beginning of the treatment (TqCo1) and semi-annually afterwards (Tq6Mo' Tq12Mo, Tq18Mo, Tq24Mo, Tq30Mo) and finally at the end of the treatment (Tq final).
The objective of this study will be to evaluate the effect of photobiomodulation on the acceleration of the orthodontic movement of molar verticalization and its effect on pain and inflammation of the periodontal tissues. Thirty-four healthy patients aged 30-60 years, who need to recover the prosthetic space for oral rehabilitation after loss of the posterior inferior dental elements and inclination of the adjacent element, will be randomly divided into 2 groups: G1 (control group) - verticalization by mini-implant + PBM (photobiomodulation) simulation (placebo); G2 (experimental group) - verticalization by mini-implant + PBM. The movements will occur with the aid of mini-implants and elastomeric chains ligatures. The PBM will occur with diode laser application, 660 nm (nanometers), 100mW (milliwatts), receiving 1J(joule) per point, 10s (seconds), 10 points (5 per buccal and 5 per lingual) and radiant exposure of 25 J / cm². The crevicular gingival fluid (FGC) will be collected to analyzed Interleukins IL1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10(Interleukins) and TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor) by ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). Radiographic shots will be taken each month to ascertain the amount (in degrees) of verticalization. To evaluate the pain, the Visual Analogue Scale will be used in all the consultations, and to evaluate the quality of life, the OHIP-14 (oral health impact profile) questionnaire will be applied. Analgesics will be given and the number of drugs will be counted. If the data are normal, they will be submitted to the Student's t-test. The data will be presented as means ± SD(standard deviation) and the value of p will be defined as <0.05.
This study is a single-blind randomized controlled trial on fixed orthodontic appliance candidates (n = 90) assigned into a control group (n = 30) and two different study groups (n = 30 in each). Patients who requiring non-extraction fixed orthodontic treatment, crowding under 5mm in the incisors and heaving at least 20 permanent teeth with healthy periodontal tissue and devoid of caries were included in the study. The control group received a standard printed educational material assisted with verbal information. The study groups either received video assisted or hands-on training about fixed orthodontic appliance and oral hygiene. The time requirements for all three educational interventions were recorded at the initial visit. The adequacy of oral hygiene is documented through plaque and gingival indices at the initial visit and 8th week of the treatment.
- Evaluate and compare initial changes in PBF between conventional and self-ligating fixed orthodontic brackets during leveling and alignment stage using 0.016" Nickle titanium (NiTi) and 0.016X0.022" NiTi archwires at different time intervals (20min, 24h, 72h, 1 week and 1 month) of initial arch wire placement.