Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05872880 |
Other study ID # |
202211261 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Recruiting |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
April 1, 2022 |
Est. completion date |
September 2026 |
Study information
Verified date |
November 2022 |
Source |
Xiangya Hospital of Central South University |
Contact |
anjie min |
Phone |
1817313127 |
Email |
403535180[@]qq.com |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Research shows that most oral cancer patients are already locally advanced when first
diagnosed. Even after surgery and radiation, nearly half of patients develop recurrence or
metastasis. Even in patients who survive, there is a serious decline in quality of life due
to the after-effects of surgery and radiation. Many patients therefore refuse surgery and
lose the treatment opportunity. Many studies at home and abroad have found that preoperative
induction chemotherapy for locally advanced tumors can reduce tumor load, reduce tumor scope,
eliminate distant micro metastases, reduce the risk of recurrence and metastasis, and improve
organ preservation rate. It has been confirmed in many clinical studies and our clinical
practice of oral cancer MDT(Multi-Disciplinary Treatment) that induction chemotherapy with
TPExtreme protocol (cetuximab + albumin-paclitaxel + cisplatin) for patients with locally
advanced oral cancer can significantly reduce the tumor with a good objective response, which
can create good conditions for surgery. Therefore, for patients sensitive to induction
chemotherapy, there are no authoritative guidelines and clinical studies to say what is the
scope of surgery. One option is for the thoroughness of the tumor resection, which is still
the same as the scope of the tumor before induction therapy, but the scope of the surgery is
still large, and the damage to the patient's quality of life is also serious. The other
option is to perform modified radical surgery according to the scope of residual tumor
lesions after induction therapy, with less trauma and less damage to the quality of life.
Postoperative radiotherapy (chemical) therapy is to reduce the risk of recurrence. Our
preliminary clinical practice also shows that Patients sensitive to induction chemotherapy
can obtain better survival rate and quality of life after comprehensive treatment including
modified radical surgery. This treatment mode is feasible, but the overall efficacy
evaluation needs further study. Therefore, in this real world prospective clinical study,
patients with oral cancer sensitive to induction chemotherapy will be treated with modified
radical surgery or traditional radical surgery in full compliance with the patient's wishes.
Through clinical observation and follow-up statistics. To explore the effects of two
treatment regimens on survival rate and quality of life in order to find the best treatment
mode.
Description:
Statistics showed that 65% of patients with oral cancer had been locally advanced when they
were first diagnosed, and the tumor load was large. Even after radical surgical resection and
radiotherapy, about 45% of patients with locally advanced oral cancer still have recurrence
or metastasis, and the prognosis is poor. Even if the patients survive, due to the damage to
tissues and organs caused by large-scale surgical excision, they often have a greater impact
on the functions and appearance of the patients, such as chewing, swallowing, language, etc.,
the quality of life of the patients is generally poor and the medical costs are relatively
high. Many studies at home and abroad have found that preoperative induction chemotherapy for
advanced tumors can shrink tumor scope, eliminate distant micro metastases, reduce the risk
of recurrence and metastasis, and improve organ preservation rate. It has been confirmed in
many clinical practice that induction chemotherapy with TPExtreme protocol (cetuximab +
albumin-paclitaxel + cisplatin) for patients with locally advanced oral cancer can
significantly reduce the tumor volume with a good objective response rate (up to about 80%),
which can create good conditions for surgery. The specific scheme was albumin paclitaxel
200mg/m2 D1; Cisplatin 75mg/m2, divided into 2-3 days; Cetuximab 400mg/m2 D1(250mg/m2
D8,D15), one cycle of treatment is 21 days, a total of 2 courses. However, for patients
sensitive to induction chemotherapy, there has been no clear guideline on how to define the
scope of surgical resection after tumor shrinkage or even disappearance, and there is also a
lack of relevant clinical research to explore this. According to the RECIST 1.1 guideline for
response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, equal or more than 50% reduction in lesion size
can be included in this study. Patients fit the clinical trial criteria divide into two
groups according to the patient's wishes. One group is radical surgery, patients receive
surgery based on the tumor size before induction therapy, the other group is modified radical
surgery who undergoes surgery based on the tumor size after induction therapy. Radical
surgery is more extensive than modified radical surgery, and often requires mandibulectomy
and internal fixation, as well as free flap transplantation to repair and reconstruct oral
and maxillofacial defects, so it may need to use some special equipment. Such as titanium
plate and titanium nail for internal fixation, microvascular anastomosis device, etc.
However, modified radical surgery has a relatively small surgical range and is less likely to
use the above devices. And during the operation, the incisal margin was 1~1.5cm outside the
tumor boundary. If necessary, the lower lip and mandible could be incised, the facial skin
could be excised, the mandibular bone could be segmental excision, and the defects could be
repaired by pedicle or free skin (bone) flap. At the same time, improved radical neck
dissection was performed on both sides of the affected neck. In operation, multiple incisal
margin rapid disease examination was performed during the operation to ensure negative
incisal margin and complete resection of the residual tumor lesion. Under this premise,
minimize surgical trauma and preserve the patient's organs and appearance. Postoperative
radiotherapy (or chemoradiotherapy) therapy to reduce the risk of recurrence. Postoperative
radiotherapy was performed within 4-6 weeks after surgery. Linear accelerator/conformal
intensity modulated radiotherapy was used for radiotherapy, and primary site radiotherapy was
performed once a day, 5 times a week. The specific dose of radiotherapy is:
PGTV(residue):66-70Gy/30-33f(2-2.2Gy/f), PGTVtb(no residue):60-66Gy/30-33f(2-2.2Gy/f) ,
PGTVnd/ndtb:60-70Gy/30-33f(2-2.2Gy/f), high risk PTV:60Gy/30f(2Gy/f), low risk
PTV:54Gy/30f(1.8Gy/f)。Our preliminary clinical practice showed that more and more patients
with oral cancer tend to accept relatively less traumatic surgical programs, and patients
sensitive to induction chemotherapy can obtain better survival rates and quality of life
through modified radical surgery and postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy. This treatment mode
is feasible, but the overall efficacy evaluation needs further study. Therefore, in this real
world prospective clinical study, patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma sensitive to
induction chemotherapy will be treated with modified radical surgery or traditional radical
surgery in full compliance with the patient's wishes (without any biased intervention in the
patient's clinical medical treatment). Through clinical observation and follow-up statistics.
To explore the effects of two treatment regimens on survival rate and quality of life in
order to find the best treatment mode.