View clinical trials related to Opioid Abuse.
Filter by:Our proposed evaluation study is designed to evaluate the impact of a recently completed stepped wedge cluster randomized trial, conducted at Kaiser Permanente Washington (KPWA), of an intervention to improve care and management of patients with drug use disorders (DUDs) in primary care (Aim 1). We will also explore the reasons for any apparent gaps in DUD care by analyzing clinicians' free-text encounter notes using manual chart review, natural language processing (NLP), and/or NLP-assisted manual chart review, as appropriate (Aim 2). Specific Project Aims are as follows: Aim 1 The primary research question we address in Aim 1 is whether routine screening for drug use disorders in primary care (PC) settings increases DUD treatment. We define DUDs as including opioid use disorders (OUD), cannabis use disorders (CUD), and other non-alcohol drug use disorders (OTH). Previously published analyses indicate that the 22 PC clinics in this trial sustained very high rates of screening (88%) and a 3-clinic DUD pilot study suggested that this screening resulted in increased diagnosis of CUD and increased treatment of DUDs in general, even at relatively low observed rates of PC-based screening and assessment. Aim 2 The overall goal of Aim 2 is to expand our understanding of gaps in DUD diagnosis and treatment that persist-despite implementation of high rates of PC screening and assessment for SUDs-using rich information available only in free-text chart notes. Through analysis of relevant chart notes Aim 2 of this project will descriptively characterize gaps in DUD diagnosis and DUD treatment (i.e., instances where information in a patient's record suggests a DUD could be diagnosed but no diagnosis is present, or a new diagnosis suggest treatment is indicated but no evidence of treatment is present), and characterize reasons for DUD care gaps.
This study is a collaboration between the University of Utah and Castleview Hospital in Price, Utah. Buprenorphine is a medication approved by the FDA to treat Opioid Use Disorder (OUD). Castleview Hospital currently does not prescribe buprenorphine in the emergency department (ED) instead it refers patients to outside addiction treatment facilities. This is a service focused project which the University of Utah will provide mentoring and education to Castleview in implementing an in ED buprenorphine/naloxone distribution program along with referral to continued services. After the program has been implemented, the investigators will evaluate it using quantitative surveys of program participants and qualitative interviews of hospital staff and stakeholders.
Investigators will test, for safety and efficacy, a novel treatment for opiate addiction that applies a 4-minute treatment of intense near infra-red light to stimulate a side of the brain that the investigators determine to be healthier, more mature, and less traumatized. Investigators will compare among actively using participants an active and a sham treatment given either once or twice weekly for 25-weeks at 2 sites. Investigators hope this will lead to a significant weapon in the battle against the opioid epidemic as well as lead to psychological and physiological insights into possible relations among trauma, cerebral laterality, and addiction.
The overarching goal of this project is to increase the availability of OUD treatment in rural counties in the state of Georgia by using Emergency Department (ED)-based telehealth strategies to initiate MOUD and connect patients to treatment. The investigators will implement a novel collaboration between rural EDs, medical toxicologists at the Georgia Poison Center (GPC), peer recovery coaches (PRCs) and RCOs throughout Georgia to bridge the gap between OUD treatment need in rural EDs and specialty physician availability at the GPC. Research activities will be conducted during two broad phases, at three rural EDs in Georgia: planning and implementation. During the planning phase, aggregate data will be obtained to determine each ED's existing practices treating patients with OUD and opioid withdrawal. During the implementation phase, the researchers will prospectively study a poison center OUD consultation and PRC intervention as it is rolled out at each site, collecting participant-level data. Sites will be rolled into the implementation phase in a stepped-wedge fashion, so there will be times when some sites are in the planning phase while others are in the implementation phase.
This goal of this observational study is to develop and test the Opioid Risk Reduction Clinical Decision Support (ORRCDS) tool. The tool will be an opioid medication risk screener and decision support platform that will be used by pharmacists upon dispensing prescription opioid medication. Once the Opioid Risk Reduction has been developed, we will examine the impact of the ORRCDS within two divisions of a large chain retail pharmacy. Pharmacies will be randomized to using the Opioid Risk Reduction Clinical Decision Support (ORRCDS) tool or standard of care opioid dispensation. We hypothesize that patients at pharmacies randomized to the ORRCDS tool will be more likely to reduce their risk status to low or moderate compared to the patients at standard of care pharmacies.
Microdosing induction is a novel method of starting buprenorphine/naloxone without patients experiencing the opioid withdrawal that is a part of traditional induction. Patients take small doses of buprenorphine/naloxone that increase slowly over a week. Although microdosing induction has been supported anecdotally, its effectiveness is not known. The proposed study will compare the effectiveness and safety of two induction strategies for transitioning patients from opioids to buprenorphine/naloxone. All inductions will occur in an outpatient telehealth opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment setting. The study will compare patients who receive traditional induction versus microdosing induction. Primary outcomes include effectiveness and safety. Secondary outcomes include treatment retention, self-reported use of opioids during induction, return to opioid use, opioid appearance in drug screens, craving/withdrawal symptoms, and patient satisfaction.
The goal of this experimental study is to compare different education intervention on opioid education for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. The specific research questions to address are: 1. Does perioperative education pathway reduce opioid refill requests? 2. Is education pathway that focuses on pain management provided in-person and via video in repeated sessions more effective than current standard of care education consisting of a single exposure given as part of a broader preoperative presentation covering multiple topics? 3. Is there a difference between education provided in-person vs video? 4. Does perioperative education improve compliance with multimodal analgesia? 5. Does perioperative education improve appropriate opioid storage? 6. Does perioperative education improve appropriate opioid disposal? Enrolled patients will be assigned at random to one of 3 study groups. Group 1 (control): Patients are referred to the hospital's standard 1-hour virtual patient education webinar prior to surgery. Group 2 (in-person): Patients will receive two in-person education sessions (1st session before surgery and 2nd session after surgery). Patients will also receive portable document format (pdf) handouts about opioid and pain management. Group 3 (video): Patients will receive two video education sessions (1st session before surgery and 2nd session after surgery). Patients will also receive pdf handouts about opioid and pain management.
Investigators studied a baseline population of patients receiving pancreatectomies at their institution and determined how many opioid pills each patient was prescribed and how many they took. Based on this data they created a toolkit to provide to prescribers to give patients a modified number of pills. The amount prescribed and consumed was measured after intervention.
In this study, the investigators will measure affective, neurocognitive and behavioral outcomes related to chronic use of opioids and benzodiazepines (screening phase), and in response to the administration of the opioid morphine, the benzodiazepine alprazolam, morphine then alprazolam, alprazolam then morphine, morphine+alprazolam simultaneously, and placebo (laboratory pharmacology experiment). The latter will enable the investigators to assess the effects of an opioid alone, benzodiazepine alone, concurrent and simultaneous administration of opioid+benzodiazepine, relative to a placebo control.
Persistent opioid abuse presents a common yet under-recognized problem given the decreasing rates of morbidity and mortality following common elective surgical procedures, like total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Each year around 33-70% of patients seeking surgical procedures in the U.S. transition to persistent opioid use following elective surgery (such as TJA), primarily prescribed for post-operative pain management. Further, these patients are more likely to demand greater doses and for longer duration post-surgery due to maladaptive neurologic changes occurring in key areas of the brain. The purpose of this study is to see if it is feasible to use OLP (open label placebo) for post-operative pain management in the post TJA setting. In addition the investigators will also collect pilot data to compare key outcome measures (patient reported physical function related to osteoarthritis of the hip and knee, pain score, and health-related quality of life will be assessed) between the placebo and the Treatment-As-Usual (TAU) group over a 90-day post-operative period.