Older Adults Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Quasi-experimental Study Design of Evaluation the Effects of Brief Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia on Regulating Stress and Sleep Quality in Middle-aged and Older Adults With Chronic Insomnia
This study aims to investigate whether a four-week BBTi program can effectively improve chronic insomnia and reduce overall stress in middle-aged and elderly individuals.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 80 |
Est. completion date | December 31, 2023 |
Est. primary completion date | December 31, 2023 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 40 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - individuals aged 40 years and above, - experiencing sleep disturbances, - willing to participate in the research project and provide informed consent Exclusion Criteria: ?Cognitive impairment |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Taiwan | National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University | Tainan City |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
National Cheng-Kung University Hospital |
Taiwan,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Insomnia severity (T1) | The investigators collected the insomnia severity from participants:
The Insomnia Severity Scale (ISI) comprises seven items. Each question is scored on a scale of 0 to 4 points, and total scores are ranged 0-28 points. A higher total score indicates a higher severity of insomnia. Specifically, a score ranging from 0 to 7 indicates no significant insomnia issues, while a score of 8 to 14 signifies mild sleep difficulties. An ISI score falling within the range of 15 to 21 reflects moderate insomnia, and a score of 22 to 28 indicates severe insomnia. |
the first week | |
Primary | Insomnia severity (T2) | The investigators collected the insomnia severity from participants:
The Insomnia Severity Scale (ISI) comprises seven items. Each question is scored on a scale of 0 to 4 points, and total scores are ranged 0-28 points. A higher total score indicates a higher severity of insomnia. Specifically, a score ranging from 0 to 7 indicates no significant insomnia issues, while a score of 8 to 14 signifies mild sleep difficulties. An ISI score falling within the range of 15 to 21 reflects moderate insomnia, and a score of 22 to 28 indicates severe insomnia. |
the second week | |
Primary | Insomnia severity (T3) | The investigators collected the insomnia severity from participants:
The Insomnia Severity Scale (ISI) comprises seven items. Each question is scored on a scale of 0 to 4 points, and total scores are ranged 0-28 points. A higher total score indicates a higher severity of insomnia. Specifically, a score ranging from 0 to 7 indicates no significant insomnia issues, while a score of 8 to 14 signifies mild sleep difficulties. An ISI score falling within the range of 15 to 21 reflects moderate insomnia, and a score of 22 to 28 indicates severe insomnia. |
the third week | |
Primary | Insomnia severity (T4) | The investigators collected the insomnia severity from participants:
The Insomnia Severity Scale (ISI) comprises seven items. Each question is scored on a scale of 0 to 4 points, and total scores are ranged 0-28 points. A higher total score indicates a higher severity of insomnia. Specifically, a score ranging from 0 to 7 indicates no significant insomnia issues, while a score of 8 to 14 signifies mild sleep difficulties. An ISI score falling within the range of 15 to 21 reflects moderate insomnia, and a score of 22 to 28 indicates severe insomnia. |
the fourth week | |
Primary | Sleep health (T1) | The researchers collected data using the Regulatory Satisfaction Alertness Timing Efficiency Duration (RU-SATED) questionnaire from the participants.
The RU-SATED questionnaire consists of six questions, each evaluating distinct facets of sleep health. These questions encompass aspects such as sleep regularity, sleep satisfaction, daytime alertness, sleep timing, sleep efficiency, and sleep duration. Each question is rated on a scale of 0 to 2 points, resulting in a total score that ranges from 0 to 12 points. A higher total score across these six questions indicates a greater level of sleep health. |
the first week | |
Primary | Sleep health (T2) | The researchers collected data using the Regulatory Satisfaction Alertness Timing Efficiency Duration (RU-SATED) questionnaire from the participants.
The RU-SATED questionnaire consists of six questions, each evaluating distinct facets of sleep health. These questions encompass aspects such as sleep regularity, sleep satisfaction, daytime alertness, sleep timing, sleep efficiency, and sleep duration. Each question is rated on a scale of 0 to 2 points, resulting in a total score that ranges from 0 to 12 points. A higher total score across these six questions indicates a greater level of sleep health. |
the second week | |
Primary | Sleep health (T3) | The researchers collected data using the Regulatory Satisfaction Alertness Timing Efficiency Duration (RU-SATED) questionnaire from the participants.
The RU-SATED questionnaire consists of six questions, each evaluating distinct facets of sleep health. These questions encompass aspects such as sleep regularity, sleep satisfaction, daytime alertness, sleep timing, sleep efficiency, and sleep duration. Each question is rated on a scale of 0 to 2 points, resulting in a total score that ranges from 0 to 12 points. A higher total score across these six questions indicates a greater level of sleep health. |
the third week | |
Primary | Sleep health (T4) | The researchers collected data using the Regulatory Satisfaction Alertness Timing Efficiency Duration (RU-SATED) questionnaire from the participants.
The RU-SATED questionnaire consists of six questions, each evaluating distinct facets of sleep health. These questions encompass aspects such as sleep regularity, sleep satisfaction, daytime alertness, sleep timing, sleep efficiency, and sleep duration. Each question is rated on a scale of 0 to 2 points, resulting in a total score that ranges from 0 to 12 points. A higher total score across these six questions indicates a greater level of sleep health. |
the fourth week | |
Primary | Sleep Diary_Sleep efficacy (%) (T1) | The researchers obtained sleep diaries from the participants.
The sleep diary is a subjective record in which subjects document their sleep patterns. The following aspects can be assessed through the sleep diary: Total Sleep Time (TST):Calculated as the time elapsed from the moment of waking to the time of falling asleep. Sleep Efficiency: The ratio of total sleep time (TST) to time in bed (TIB) (multiplied by 100 to yield a percentage) |
the first week | |
Primary | Sleep Diary_Sleep efficacy (%) (T2) | The researchers obtained sleep diaries from the participants.
The sleep diary is a subjective record in which subjects document their sleep patterns. The following aspects can be assessed through the sleep diary: Total Sleep Time (TST):Calculated as the time elapsed from the moment of waking to the time of falling asleep. Sleep Efficiency: The ratio of total sleep time (TST) to time in bed (TIB) (multiplied by 100 to yield a percentage) |
the second week | |
Primary | Sleep Diary_Sleep efficacy (%) (T3) | The researchers obtained sleep diaries from the participants.
The sleep diary is a subjective record in which subjects document their sleep patterns. The following aspects can be assessed through the sleep diary: Total Sleep Time (TST):Calculated as the time elapsed from the moment of waking to the time of falling asleep. Sleep Efficiency: The ratio of total sleep time (TST) to time in bed (TIB) (multiplied by 100 to yield a percentage) |
the third week | |
Primary | Sleep Diary_Sleep efficacy (%) (T4) | The researchers obtained sleep diaries from the participants.
The sleep diary is a subjective record in which subjects document their sleep patterns. The following aspects can be assessed through the sleep diary: Total Sleep Time (TST):Calculated as the time elapsed from the moment of waking to the time of falling asleep. Sleep Efficiency: The ratio of total sleep time (TST) to time in bed (TIB) (multiplied by 100 to yield a percentage) |
the fourth week | |
Primary | Anxiety (T1) | The researchers collected data using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) from the participants.
This scale, originally developed by Zigmond and Snaith in 1983, was designed for individuals with physical illnesses. It consists of a total of 14 items, each scored on a four-point scale (ranging from 0 to 3 points). The scale comprises 7 items related to anxiety and 7 items related to depression. Interpretation of the scores is as follows: A total score of less than 8 indicates the absence of anxiety. A score falling between 8 and 10 suggests possible anxiety. A score exceeding 11 indicates the presence of anxiety in the patient. |
the first week | |
Primary | Anxiety (T2) | The researchers collected data using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) from the participants.
This scale, originally developed by Zigmond and Snaith in 1983, was designed for individuals with physical illnesses. It consists of a total of 14 items, each scored on a four-point scale (ranging from 0 to 3 points). The scale comprises 7 items related to anxiety and 7 items related to depression. Interpretation of the scores is as follows: A total score of less than 8 indicates the absence of anxiety. A score falling between 8 and 10 suggests possible anxiety. A score exceeding 11 indicates the presence of anxiety in the patient. |
the second week | |
Primary | Anxiety (T3) | The researchers collected data using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) from the participants.
This scale, originally developed by Zigmond and Snaith in 1983, was designed for individuals with physical illnesses. It consists of a total of 14 items, each scored on a four-point scale (ranging from 0 to 3 points). The scale comprises 7 items related to anxiety and 7 items related to depression. Interpretation of the scores is as follows: A total score of less than 8 indicates the absence of anxiety. A score falling between 8 and 10 suggests possible anxiety. A score exceeding 11 indicates the presence of anxiety in the patient. |
the third week | |
Primary | Anxiety (T4) | The researchers collected data using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) from the participants.
This scale, originally developed by Zigmond and Snaith in 1983, was designed for individuals with physical illnesses. It consists of a total of 14 items, each scored on a four-point scale (ranging from 0 to 3 points). The scale comprises 7 items related to anxiety and 7 items related to depression. Interpretation of the scores is as follows: A total score of less than 8 indicates the absence of anxiety. A score falling between 8 and 10 suggests possible anxiety. A score exceeding 11 indicates the presence of anxiety in the patient. |
the fourth week | |
Primary | Depression (T1) | The researchers collected data using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) from the participants.
This scale, originally developed by Zigmond and Snaith in 1983, was designed for individuals with physical illnesses. It consists of a total of 14 items, each scored on a four-point scale (ranging from 0 to 3 points). The scale comprises 7 items related to anxiety and 7 items related to depression. Interpretation of the scores is as follows: A total score of less than 8 indicates the absence of depression. A score falling between 8 and 10 suggests possible depression. A score exceeding 11 indicates the presence of depression in the patient. |
the first week | |
Primary | Depression (T2) | The researchers collected data using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) from the participants.
This scale, originally developed by Zigmond and Snaith in 1983, was designed for individuals with physical illnesses. It consists of a total of 14 items, each scored on a four-point scale (ranging from 0 to 3 points). The scale comprises 7 items related to anxiety and 7 items related to depression. Interpretation of the scores is as follows: A total score of less than 8 indicates the absence of depression. A score falling between 8 and 10 suggests possible depression. A score exceeding 11 indicates the presence of depression in the patient. |
the second week | |
Primary | Depression (T3) | The researchers collected data using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) from the participants.
This scale, originally developed by Zigmond and Snaith in 1983, was designed for individuals with physical illnesses. It consists of a total of 14 items, each scored on a four-point scale (ranging from 0 to 3 points). The scale comprises 7 items related to anxiety and 7 items related to depression. Interpretation of the scores is as follows: A total score of less than 8 indicates the absence of depression. A score falling between 8 and 10 suggests possible depression. A score exceeding 11 indicates the presence of depression in the patient. |
the third week | |
Primary | Depression (T4) | The researchers collected data using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) from the participants.
This scale, originally developed by Zigmond and Snaith in 1983, was designed for individuals with physical illnesses. It consists of a total of 14 items, each scored on a four-point scale (ranging from 0 to 3 points). The scale comprises 7 items related to anxiety and 7 items related to depression. Interpretation of the scores is as follows: A total score of less than 8 indicates the absence of depression. A score falling between 8 and 10 suggests possible depression. A score exceeding 11 indicates the presence of depression in the patient. |
the fourth week | |
Primary | Stress index (ms2) (T1) | The investigators use EUREKA to detect the heartbeat variation of participants and analyze the pressure index.
Stress index (ms2) < 50: abnormal records; 50-150: Normal; 150-500: fatigue state or greater physical and mental stress; 500-900: severe physical and mental stress; > 900 extreme physical and mental stress or other physical diseases. |
the first week | |
Primary | Stress index (ms2) (T3) | The investigators use EUREKA to detect the heartbeat variation of participants and analyze the pressure index.
Stress index (ms2) < 50: abnormal records; 50-150: Normal; 150-500: fatigue state or greater physical and mental stress; 500-900: severe physical and mental stress; > 900 extreme physical and mental stress or other physical diseases. |
the third week |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04521374 -
The Effects of Texture Modified Diets on Dietary Intake and Appetite Responses in Older Adults
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05039879 -
Life Improving Factors After a Hip Fracture
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05978336 -
SuPA Mobility: Supporting Physical Activity for Mobility in Mobility-Limited Older Adults
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02905370 -
Progressing Home Health Rehabilitation for Older Adults
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06453473 -
Transfer Effects of Stationary Bicycle Perturbation Training on Older Adults' Cycling Skills
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03039556 -
Step-reduction in Older Men and Women
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05901506 -
Strengthen Family Members' Understanding of Advance Care Planning With a Nurse-led, Motivational Interview
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06030128 -
Core Stabilization Exercise Therapy in Chronic Lower Back Back Management in Community Dwelling Older Adults
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04044183 -
Managing Pain and Cognitions in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment or Memory Related Problems and Chronic Pain
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06323954 -
tVNS During Motor Training in Older Adults
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05366075 -
The Preventing Functional Decline in Acutely Hospitalized Older Patients (PREV_FUNC) Study
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05497960 -
Vivo Prediabetes Study: Online, Live, and Interactive Strength Training for Older Adults With Prediabetes
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05083221 -
Effect of an Aural Rehabilitation Program in Hearing-impaired Older Adults
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05397158 -
Optimization of Intestinal Preparation in Older Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05459103 -
Remote Interactive Intervention for Loneliness
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05025137 -
Flexi-Bar and Multi-Component Exercises
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04927026 -
"Where-there-is-no-psychiatrist Integrated Personal Therapy" Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03197038 -
Exercise Training and Cognitive Function in Kidney Disease
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06302686 -
engAGE: Managing cognitivE decliNe throuGh Theatre Therapy, Artificial Intelligence and Social Robots drivEn Interventions
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05078008 -
The Role of Balneotherapy in Older Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain
|
N/A |