Clinical Trials Logo

Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA).

Filter by:
  • Not yet recruiting  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT05530967 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)

Assessing the Validity of the PAP Problems Triage Tool in Patients With PAP Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

TriagingTool
Start date: January 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The intended use of the Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) Problems Triaging Tool (TT) is to appropriately triage patients with a PAP-associated problem(s) to a specific intervention(s) based on patient responses. Thus, the proposed research will validate the tool, determine optimal scoring thresholds, and explore the utility of the tool as an indicator for intervention. Our central hypothesis is that the PAP Problems TT will identify treatment barriers that if unaddressed, are predictive of treatment non-adherence.

NCT ID: NCT04939168 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)

Measuring Atomoxetine and Aroxybutynin In Patients With OSA

MARIPOSA
Start date: September 30, 2021
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

MARIPOSA is a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm 1-month study of AD109 in participants with OSA. Enrolled participants will be randomized to one of 5 parallel treatment arms.

NCT ID: NCT04559737 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)

CPAP Population Management

Start date: July 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The investigators propose a study to formally compare two Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) follow-up pathways: 1) Usual care - follow-up visits reflect standard care practice and we rely on patients to reach out to us if they are struggling with therapy (there will be no active outreach); 2) Case Management - in addition to "Usual Care" visits, patients CPAP use will be monitored and further encounters may be initiated with "struggler" CPAP users while "successful" users are passively followed. The investigators will evaluate measures of CPAP adherence, patient engagement and cost-effectiveness for the duration of 1 year. Our hypothesis is that "Case Management" will improve CPAP adherence and cost-effectiveness compared to "Usual Care". The investigators also hypothesize that targeting "strugglers" only in a management by exception (MBE) approach will be equally effective, but require less personnel time compared to targeting "all" patients.