View clinical trials related to Obstetric Pain.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to determine if non-invasive distracting devices (Virtual Reality headset) are more effective than the standard of care (i.e., no technology based distraction) for preventing anxiety and pain scores in women who are undergoing child laboring procedures. The anticipated primary outcome will be a reduction of pregnant females overall anxiety and pain scores before and after such procedure(s), including but not limited to epidural/combined spinal epidural (CSE), IV placement and/or labor.
To assess the efficacy of epidural dexamethasone administration, compared to placebo, in reducing local anesthetics consumption during labor epidural analgesia in parturient women
The specific aim of the study is to do comparison between ANSiStim and Placebo for pain relief in labor. During the treatment, pain relief will be assesed with ANSiStim in active labor through continues checking of VAS SCORE. ANSiStim has been tried in post operative patients with good pain relief .
Administration of anesthetic solution into the epidural space is usually accomplished by a combination of continuous infusion, provider-administered boluses and patient-administered boluses (patient controlled epidural analgesia [PCEA]). The optimal method for maintaining labor analgesia is unknown. Several studies have demonstrated that timed-intermittent boluses, in combination with patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA), provide superior maintenance of labor analgesia than maintenance with a continuous infusion with PCEA. Epidural infusion pumps capable of delivering timed boluses of local anesthetic with PCEA recently became commercially available. Several infusion rates are available for delivering the timed bolus, and the optimal bolus rate is unknown.
Abstract. Epidural analgesia is the most safe and effective for the treatment of pain of childbirth method. Epidural Bupivacaine provided excellent analgesia for labor and remains the most widely used local anesthetic in obstetric anesthesia. Objective: To evaluate the analgesic efficacy of two concentrations of bupivacaine in women in labor. Methods: 114 patients were included in labor with term pregnancy. Were grouped randomly into two groups: patients who received bupivacaine 0.125 % (Group A) and 0.25% bupivacaine (group B). Patients in group A received 10 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine bolus. The patients in group B received 10 ml. Bupivacaine 0.25% bolus. Pain intensity according to VAS, blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, degree of motor block was assessed using the Bromage scale at different periods of time. Results: Demographic characteristics and parity were compared, no statistically significant differences. By comparing the values of the VAS measure 0, 15, 30, 60 and 90 minutes into statistically significant differences in favor of the group with 0.25% Bupivacaine with decreased pain perception after 30 minutes, p-value found 0.02. No differences in arterial pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate were found between the two groups. Conclusion: The concentration of 0.25% Bupivacaine has greater analgesic efficacy compared with 0.125% bupivacaine.
During labor there is an increased production of inflammatory mediators called cytokines. Higher concentration of certain cytokines has been linked to adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes. Epidural analgesia is commonly performed after the parturient feels labor pain. We hypothesis that preemptive epidural analgesia (initiated before labor pain begins)can influence the production of cytokines.