View clinical trials related to Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.
Filter by:Randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing therapist-guided Internet-based Cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT), self-guided ICBT, and individual face-to-face (f2f) CBT for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) in adults. The primary objective is to evaluate whether ICBT is a non-inferior treatment option compared to the best possible available treatment for OCD, individual face to face (f2f) CBT. A second objective is to compare the efficacy of self-guided vs. therapist-guided ICBT. As this question has cost implications for the health system, a third objective is to carry out a health economic evaluation of both forms of ICBT, in relation to the gold standard f2f CBT. A fourth objective is to explore whether ICBT is equally suited for clinic-referred cases compared to self-referred patients. Finally, a fifth objective is to investigate whether genetic markers, in combination with clinical variables, can be employed to predict treatment outcomes with CBT in general. Research Questions: Q1: Is therapist-guided internet-based CBT (ICBT) for OCD non-inferior to face-to-face (f2f) CBT with regard to OCD symptoms, function and quality of life? Q2: Is entirely self-guided ICBT non-inferior to f2f CBT with regard to OCD symptoms, function and quality of life? Q3: Is ICBT a cost-effective treatment, compared to f2f CBT? Q4: Is there a difference in treatment outcome between self-referred and clinical referred patients? Q5: Can clinical variables and genetic markers be useful to predict which patients will benefit from CBT?
The purpose of this study is two-fold: first, to observe the effect of one session of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on the error-prediction abilities of patients with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) as well as healthy individuals; and second, to observe the clinical effect of 10 sessions of rTMS in patients with OCD.
In this study the investigators will use semi-structured interviews to qualitatively analyse patient and family member experiences with either deep brain stimulation or other forms of psychiatric neurosurgery.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of repetitive TMS (rTMS) delivered simultaneously with elements of cognitive behavioral therapy/exposure-response prevention (CBT/ERP) in adult subjects (greater or equal to 18 years old) with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). This is an open label study that involves standard of care for OCD (CBT) and an investigational treatment modality (TMS). The investigators will compare the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) scores before and after treatment to quantify clinical improvement. The side effects from TMS include, but are not limited to, headache, seizure, and general pain. CBT has minimal side effects other than mental discomfort during the exposure sessions. For safety concerns, pregnant women and subjects with seizure-related history will be excluded as well as other indicated conditions in the details protocol.
Objectives.-Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive stimulation methods that became widely used as therapeutic tools in neuropsychiatric research. The aim of this study is to Evaluate the therapeutic impact of different frequencies of repetitive transcranial stimulation (1HZ, 10HZ) in OCD patients. Material and Methods; Forty five patients of OCD were participated in the study. All patients fulfilled the diagnostic criteria of DSM-IV-TR. The mean age of the patients was 27.1+4.5 years. Each patient was subjected to the following: Yale-Brown obsessive compulsive scale (Y-BOCS), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), and Clinical Global Impression - Severity scale (CGI-S). The patients were randomly classified into three equal groups using closed envelop: 1st group received 1 Hz rTMS at 100% of the RMT, 2nd group received 10 Hz rTMS with intensity of 100% of the RMT and 3rd group was sham group received the sham stimulation with a total 2000 pulses every day for each group for 10 sessions. Follow up of the patients using the same previous scales after the end of sessions and 3 months later.
The aim of this study is to evaluate, through a pilot study with about ten cases, if bilateral ventral capsulotomy by linear accelerator enable modification of obsessive-compulsive symptoms and quality of life in patients with severe and refractory obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and also investigate possible adverse effects / complications of the procedure.
Anxiety disorders are common disorders, which pose a major burden to society and the individual. An anxiety disorder may be treated with medication, in particular with antidepressants such as the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). However, much of what is known about antidepressants is derived from research in depression rather than anxiety. In recent years, researchers have found that antidepressants are more effective for severely depressed patients than they are for patients with milder symptoms. It is possible that a similar relationship between symptom severity and antidepressant efficacy exists for anxiety disorders, but there is currently little evidence available to answer this question. As antidepressants are frequently prescribed to patients with mild or moderate anxiety, a clear understanding of their effectiveness across the severity range is vital to inform treatment decisions. Therefore, the purpose of this meta-analysis is to examine whether initial symptom severity affects antidepressant efficacy for anxiety disorders.
The purpose of this study is to find out more about how the brain stores emotional learning in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). In particular, we would like to understand how human beings learn not to fear. We are also interested in learning about how behavioral therapy (BT) for OCD affects emotional learning in the brain. We hope this study will help us understand why people with OCD cannot control unwanted fear and to develop better treatments for adults with OCD. Patients will be randomly assigned (like the flip of a coin) to receive 12 weeks of BT or 12 weeks of waitlist, followed by 12 weeks of BT. We are seeking individuals 18-60 with OCD and individuals with no psychiatric history. Participation includes a diagnostic evaluation, 12 weeks of BT or 12 weeks of waitlist followed by BT, questionnaires, and up to six (6) MRI scans. You may receive up to $500 for your participation and reimbursement for parking.
This study will evaluate the effectiveness of rTMS as a potential treatment for refractory OCD in a randomized, crossover design.
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), characterized by intrusive thoughts (obsessions) and related behavioral rituals (compulsions), is a common psychiatric illness that often emerges in childhood and causes life-long disability in over 50% of patients. Psychological theory suggests that OCD symptoms are driven by a person's difficulty disengaging their feelings from simple tasks (e.g. washing hands, locking a door) due to excessive anxiety about performance errors. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), the gold standard treatment for OCD, repeatedly exposes patients to their OCD-stressor until this anxiety is reduced. While CBT is typically more effective in teenagers than adults, patients from both age groups are usually left with residual symptoms, highlighting the need for better treatments. In this study, CBT will be studied in both teen-aged and adult patients. Two groups, both with childhood onset OCD, will be randomized to either CBT for OCD or stress management training (SMT), an active therapy but with minimal effects on OCD symptoms. The investigators will also study age-matched, healthy controls as comparison subjects. Before and after 12 weeks of CBT, all subjects will undergo functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) scans to see what regions of the brain become active when a concentration task is performed and how that activation is changed after CBT. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the brain changes associated with CBT treatment and how differences in these changes in teenage compared to adult patients may drive differences in CBT response.