View clinical trials related to NSCLC Stage IV.
Filter by:The investigators collected the data from the investigators' center between January 2011 and October 2020. The study included all non-small cell lung cancer patients with surgically excised brain metastasis. The investigators analysis the correlation of gene mutation and the disease course.
This Observational study will explore the utility of the Biodesix, Inc. "PIR" (primary immune response) test to predict outcomes in treatment-naïve advanced stage NSCLC with PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) > 50% and ECOG performance status (PS) 0-2 NSCLC patients who are treated with PD-1/PD-L1 based therapy with or without the addition of platinum based chemotherapy.
Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in Austria with 2.868 men and 2.009 women diagnosed in 2016. Reflecting the high mortality of this disease, 2.415 men and 1.534 women died from lung cancer. Therefore, lung cancer is the most common reason for cancer associated death in men and second most common reason in women. This malignant disease can be divided into two main groups: small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). NSCLC is a paradigm for personalized medicine, with an increasing number of targetable gene alterations. Despite this growing diversity of molecular subtypes, in most patients no targetable mutation can be detected. For these patients check-point inhibitors with or without chemotherapy is the mainstay of the initial tumor therapy. Until recently, little progress has been made in the treatment of SCLC in last decades. Recently, an overall survival benefit by the addition of an immune-checkpoint inhibitor to first-line chemotherapy for advanced SCLC has been reported. Despite the progress in the treatment of NSCLC, the performance of predictive biomarkers is weak. Therefore, the development of more precise prediction models is of great importance for the progress of personalized treatment strategies.
This phase IV study is hoping to determine if examining the microbiome in non-small cell lung cancer, immunotherapy naive participants can predict the effectiveness of immunotherapy treatment as well as determine ahead of time adverse events and their severity. In addition, the investigator will look into microbiome changing modifiers.
Assess the Efficacy and Safety of MYL-1402O Compared with Avastin®, in the First-line Treatment of Patients with Stage IV Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Lung cancer is the malignant tumor with the highest incidence and mortality in China. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ,which includes non-squamous cell carcinoma (including adenocarcinoma, large cell carcinoma, and other cell types) and squamous cell carcinoma, accounts for about 80% of lung cancer. Platinum-based two-drug chemotherapy is the first-line standard treatment for driver-gene negative advanced NSCLC, but most patients experience disease progression after 4 to 6 months. To extend the efficacy of first-line treatment, maintenance therapy is a logical clinical option for patients who are effective after 4 to 6 cycles of standard treatment. There is currently no standard regimen for maintenance treatment of NSCLC. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of maintenance therapy with the anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody (Toripalimab injection) followed by the first-line standard regimen in advanced NSCLC patients who are effective after standard treatment. With a view to exploring treatment methods that are effective for the maintenance treatment of driver-gene negative advanced NSCLC and have little toxic and side effects,thereby improving the survival prognosis of these patients.
This is a trial-specific (NCT03705403) decision aid (tPDA) for stage IV NSCLC patients that might want to participate. We want to investigate if a tPDA would be (significantly) helpful for these patients in making a decision. ImmunoSABR has a complex study design, we expect that the patients get a better overview of the trial via the tPDA because you can bring multiple tools together. (text, video, questions, pictures, timelines, etc.)
Multicentre, phase II, open-label, single-arm study evaluating the preliminary efficacy, safety and tolerability of atezolizumab in association with palliative radiotherapy in adult patients diagnosed with advanced (stage IV) NSCLC, irrespective of PD-L1 status, and who have oligoprogressed to both immunotherapy with an anti PD-1 agent (e.g., pembrolizumab or nivolumab) and 1 line of chemotherapy.
A Phase Ib trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Fecal Microbial Transplantation (FMT) in combination with Nivolumab in subjects with metastatic or inoperable melanoma, microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch-repair deficient (dMMR) cancer, or Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
This is a phase Ib/IIa, open-label, single center study, aiming to investigate safety and efficacy of nivolumab (administered intravenously) in combination with anlotinib (administered orally) in immunotherapy-treated advanced NSCLC. The study has been designed to allow an investigation of the optimal combination dose and schedule while ensuring the safety of patients with intensive safety monitoring. There are two main parts to this study; Part A, combination dose finding and Parts B, dose expansion. Part B will either be initiated if RP2D reached in Part A, or not initiated if RP2D was not reached in Part A. Part A has been designed to identify the recommended dose of combination of nivolumab plus anlotinib for further clinical evaluation based upon assessment of the safety and tolerability data collected during the first 21 days (cycle 1, 21 days per cycle). The 21-day assessment period was selected as the major toxicities leading to cessation of dose de-escalation in such Phase I oncology studies (haematological, gastrointestinal, liver enzymes) are anticipated to present within this duration. "3+3"design was used in the dose finding cohort. If RP2D was reached in Part A, eligible patients would be enrolled and receive nivolumab (360mg q3w, intravenously) plus anlotinib (RP2D, QD from day 1 to 14 of a 21-day cycle) till disease progression (PD) withdraw of consent, or unacceptable toxicity to further evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy in terms of ORR , DCR, DOR, PFS and OS. The tumor response will be evaluated according to RECIST Version 1.1 every 6 weeks.