View clinical trials related to Noninvasive Ventilation.
Filter by:Objective: To prove that initiation of chronic ventilatory support at home, in patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure due to neuromuscular disease (NMD) or thoracic cage problem is not inferior compared to initiation in a hospital based setting. In addition we believe that the start at home is cheaper compared to an in-hospital start. Hypothesis: Initiation of chronic ventilatory support at home is effective, safe and cost effective compared to a hospital-based initiation. Study design: A nationwide non-inferiority multi-center randomized parallel active control study. Study population: Patients with chronic respiratory insufficiency due to a neuromuscular disease (NMD) or thoracic cage problem who are referred for chronic ventilator support. Intervention: The start of HMV at home Standard intervention to be compared to: The start of HMV is normally in a clinical setting as recommended in the national guideline. Outcome measures: Primary: PaCO2. Secondary: Health related quality of life; lung function; nocturnal transcutaneous carbon dioxide assessment and saturation, and costs Sample size calculation/data analysis: This is a non-inferiority trial based on PaCO2 as primary outcome. A difference in favor of the hospital care group of smaller than 0.5 kPa will be labeled as non-inferior. To retain 72 evaluable patients, and allow for drop-outs, we will include 96 patients in total. Cost-effectiveness analysis: A cost analysis will be conducted alongside the clinical trial. Costs of the initiation of HMV at home and in the hospital will be estimated form a societal perspective over a time horizon of 6 months. Time schedule: After an initial phase of 6 months recruitment will start and will take 24 months. Thirty-six months after the start of the study the last assessments will be done and analysis and writing of the papers will start. After 42 months the study will end.
The primary objective of this study is to study the effect of therapeutic education on patient adherence for at-home continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or at-home non-invasive ventilation. This first study will use data already present in the Association for Home Assistance and Rehabilitation (APARD) database to compare patients who received therapeutic education with a control group who did not.
Randomized control trial, Ram cannula VS short nasal prongs for delivering Non Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) for preterm infants
This study evaluates the ability of high flow nasal cannula versus nasal cannula to oxygenate morbidly obese patients undergoing moderate to deep sedation for gastrointestinal procedures.
Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) weaning strategies differ considerably from one another. These strategies have yet not been compared to each other. Therefore, the investigators planned to perform a prospective, randomized, pilot study involving hypercapnic acute respiratory failure patients ready to be weaned off from NIV. The investigators are going to compare the success rate of NIV weaning and the duration of NIV after randomization between 3 NIV weaning methods: gradual decrease in duration of NIV or level of ventilator support, and abrupt discontinuation of NIV.
Prospective observational study of SNIPPV use in preterm infants of less than 32weeks of gestation from January 2012 to December 2015. Previous respiratory status is analyzed as well as respiratory outcomes and possible secondary side effects. SNIPPV is used to prevent Intubation in Infants in which nCPAP has already failed (Infants that met intubation criteria) and also is used electively for extubation when nCPAP extubation has previously failed or infants with Prolonged mechanical ventilation (more than 15 days) with high respiratory parameters (PMAP > 10 cmH2O and FiO2>35%).
Cardiologists and intensive care specialists are confronted daily with mechanically ventilated patients exhibiting cardiac failure. It is of paramount importance to understand the effect of mechanical ventilation on cardiac function and to interpret echocardiographic findings correctly in order to provide the patient with the best possible treatment to support cardiac and circulatory function. Currently physicians interpret echocardiographic findings based on studies that were performed in spontaneously breathing patients. With this study, the investigators intend to contribute to the understanding of cardiac physiology in patients needing ventilatory support, especially they aim to provide the physiological basis for the interpretation of echocardiographic findings in order to improve medical support (e.g. fluid resuscitation, vasoactive drugs, ventilation strategy) of ventilated patients with impaired cardiovascular function.