View clinical trials related to Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to determine if the investigational drug GTx-024 can help subjects with non-small cell lung cancer increase physical function and maintain or gain muscle, also called "lean body mass".
A trial to improve the quality of life of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by evaluating the symptomatic improvements in lung cancer patients receiving external radiation with or without high dose internal radiation.
This 2 arms study will compare the efficacy and safety of treatment with sequential erlotinib plus docetaxel therapy versus docetaxel alone as second line treatment in patients with recurrent non-small cell lung cancer. Patients will be randomized to receive in group 1(experimental arm): docetaxel :75 mg/m² IV day 1 every 3 weeks with erlotinib:150 mg/d per os d2-d16 and group 2 (control arm): docetaxel :75 mg/m² IV day 1 every 3 weeks. The anticipated time on study treatment is until disease progression. Target sample size is 156. The main of this study is to determine the relevance of the association sequential erlotinib and docetaxel in terms of progression-free survival .
This open-label, randomized, parallel arm study assessed the efficacy and safety of Tarceva (erlotinib) versus gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in their tumours. Patients were randomized to receive either Tarceva 150 mg orally daily or 3-week cycles of gemcitabine 1250 mg/m^2 intravenously (iv) on Days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m^2 iv on Day 1.
In the treatment of advanced cancer, maximizing quality of life (QoL) is a fundamental goal for oncologists and their patients. In order to achieve this goal, some form of systematic and reliable QoL assessment is needed in routine clinical practice to evaluate the impact of advanced cancer treatments on QoL. The Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) is a validated site-specific QoL measure designed for use in patients with lung cancer undergoing treatment. Recently it has been developed into an electronic form that uses a hand-held pocket personal computer (pc) to enhance collection and presentation of QoL assessments into clinical trials and patient care. This study will evaluate the impact of this computer-generated QoL (LCSS-QL) assessment on treatment practices for advanced lung cancer patients using a randomized trial design. The investigators hypothesize that a Computer-Generated Quality of Life Assessment Program will positively impact treatment patterns for patients with lung cancer. Specifically, the investigators hypothesize: 1. Use of the LCSS-QL will increase and accelerate referral to and use of palliative care services; 2. Use of the LCSS-QL will decrease the duration of palliative chemotherapy treatment with earlier identification of lack of benefit in some patients; 3. Use of the LCSS-QL may decrease the use of imaging tests to assess objective tumor response as an indicator of treatment benefit. Maximizing quality of life is one of the most important goals of palliative chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced lung cancer. If this simple practical tool can be demonstrated to improve palliative management of these patients, including optimizing duration of chemotherapy and use of palliative and supportive services based on patient QoL response, this will dramatically improve the quality of care provided to advanced lung cancer patients. This study will also provide a springboard for other ways to incorporate computer-generated QoL measurement in treatment decision-making in advanced cancer patients, including in other tumor types such as advanced breast and colorectal cancer.
The purpose of this protocol is to allow continued treatment with conatumumab and/or ganitumab, with or without chemotherapy, to participants who completed a separate Amgen-sponsored conatumumab or ganitumab study without disease progression whose previous studies were closed.
The purpose of this two-stage phase II study is to assess the efficacy of BKM120, as measured by determining the progression free survival (PFS), in patients with pretreated metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) that exhibits PI3K pathway activation. BKM120 will be investigated in two groups of NSCLC patients according to the histology of the cancer: squamous and non-squamous.
This is a phase II, multicenter, non-randomized, open-label study evaluating the combination of pemetrexed plus carboplatin in HIV-positive patients with lung cancer.
This single arm, open-label study will assess the efficacy and safety of Tarceva (erlotinib) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Patients will receive Tarceva at a dose of 150 mg daily orally until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs.
In recent years, it has become clear, that also in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a group of patients with less than 5 distant metastases may experience long-term survival when treated radically to all macroscopic cancer sites. Thus has mostly been established for individuals with so-called solitary brain metastases and to a lesser extend in solitary adrenal gland metastases, but in other metastatic subgroups, the same may be applicable. In a prospective survey in the region of the Integral Cancercentre (IKL), we could identify on a yearly base 30 patients with NSCLC who could theoretically be amendable for radical treatment of all oligo-metastatic locations. We therefore want to perform a prospective study in which patients with less than 4 oligo-metastatic sites from a primary NSCLC will be treated radically with the aim to improve long-term survival. As many discussion points remain, even after thorough discussions with chest physicians, pulmonary surgeons and colleagues from diagnostic disciplines, we decided to go for a pragmatic approach, implying that all macroscopic disease sites should be treated radically, being defined as surgery with a R0 resection or in case of an unforeseen R1 resection, followed by radiotherapy, or radiotherapy to a biological equivalent of at least 60 Gy in 30 daily fractions. In the same patient, one metastatic site may be treated with surgery and another with radical radiotherapy. Systemic treatment was not made mandatory, because it was felt that it's role is unclear in patients with early stage local cancer and with oligo-metastatic disease.