Non-acute Carotid Artery Occlusion Clinical Trial
Official title:
Revascularization for Symptomatic Non-acute Carotid Artery Occlusion
The short-term and long-term efficacy of recanalization therapy needs to be further confirmed by large-sample prospective studies. The comparison of success rate, complication rate and efficacy among the three recanalization modalities also needs to be further explored. The purpose of this cohort study is to observe the success rate, efficacy and safety of recanalization treatment for non-acute occlusion, and to further compare the advantages and disadvantages of CEA, endovascular intervention and hybrid surgery.
Carotid artery occlusion is one of the primary causes of ischemic stroke. When the occlusion time exceeds 30 days, it is commonlly referred to as chronic carotid artery occlusion (CCAO), and patients with carotid artery occlusion over 24 hours are collectively referred as non-acute occlusion. Symptomatic non-acute occlusion patients with definite hemodynamic hypoperfusion still face a high risk of stroke recurrence under drug treatment, with recurrence rates reported to be between 12.3% and 22.7% within 2 years. Currently, the surgical methods for the treatment of carotid artery occlusion are mainly divided into extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass and recanalization treatment. Recanalization treatment includes CEA, endovascular intervention and hybrid surgery. While the Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study (COSS) and the recently published Carotid or Middle cerebral artery Occlusion Surgery Study (CMOSS) failed to reveal the significant advantages of EC-IC bypass surgery over medical treatment for patients with symptomatic artery occlusion combined with hemodynamic insufficiency, recanalization treatment has been shown to be a promising treatment modality by case-control studies with small sample size. However, the short-term and long-term efficacy of recanalization therapy needs to be further confirmed by large-sample prospective studies. The comparison of success rate, complication rate and efficacy among the three recanalization modalities also needs to be further explored. In addition, about half of non-acute occlusion patients have cognitive impairment, and the role of cerebral hemodynamics in cognitive impairment is still unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this cohort study is to observe the success rate, efficacy and safety of recanalization treatment for non-acute occlusion, and to further compare the advantages and disadvantages of CEA, endovascular intervention and hybrid surgery. ;