Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05023343 |
Other study ID # |
SUH-TQL-QUADRICEPS |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
Phase 4
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
October 2, 2021 |
Est. completion date |
November 28, 2021 |
Study information
Verified date |
December 2021 |
Source |
Zealand University Hospital |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The aim of this study is to examine whether the administration of the TQL block cause motor
block of the lumbar plexus and thereby quadriceps muscle weakness. The investigators
hypothesise that the administration of a unilateral TQL block does not cause quadriceps
muscle weakness compared to a placebo block.
Description:
The ideal postoperative analgesic regimen following major abdominal and retroperitoneal
laparoscopic surgery still lacks consensus and the discussion is ongoing. The epidural
blockade has been the gold standard for postoperative pain management for major abdominal
surgery for years, but with the conversion to minimal invasive surgery the procedure can
rarely be justified.
The use of a multimodal analgesic regimen with opioids can cause severe side effects. These
side effects can delay mobilisation after surgery, increase the risk of complications and
worst of all be fatal.
The focus on an opioid sparing regimen, in the enhanced recovery setting, has been a
significant motivator for the addition of ultrasound-guided nerve blocks to the perioperative
progression.
At the Department of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, the ultrasound-guided
Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum (TQL) block is part of the perioperative pain regimen for
major laparoscopic abdominal and retroperitoneal surgeries, as well as for elective caesarean
sections. Using the visual guidance of ultrasound, the injectate of local anaesthetic is
administered in the fascial interspace between the quadratus lumborum muscle and the psoas
major muscle posterior to the transversalis fascia.
This will anaesthetise the abdominal wall including both somatic and visceral nerves. No
involvement of lumbar plexus i.e. the femoral nerve, obturator nerve or the lumbar part of
the sympathetic trunk was observed. The lack of lumbar plexus involvement means no motor
block of the lower extremities should be observed. Previous clinical studies reported no
adverse events. However, the investigators did not specifically register lower limb weakness
or hypotension, but on the other hand did not find any difference in ambulation or even
faster ambulation compared to the placebo group.
A few case reports have reported complications related to the various quadratus lumborum
blocks. Ueshima et al. reported that 90% (65/81 cases) experienced quadriceps muscle weakness
following a TQL block. The incidence was 19% for posterior QL block and 1% for lateral QL
block. Lower limb weakness was also reported by Wikner et al. following a bilateral lateral
QL block. A case of continuous hypotension after administration of a lateral QL block has
been described. One case of unilateral upper limb weakness and Horners Syndrome after a
bilateral posterior QL block has also been reported. Urinary retention was reported following
a continuous TQL-block. All side effects were temporary, no one reported permanent injuries.
Complications have not been reported systematically.
At Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, the investigators have administrated more than 1000
TQL blocks, and more than 300 patients have been included in various clinical trials. From
clinical experience and cadaveric studies, the investigators find no evidence that the TQL
block spread to the epidural space, and therefore does not cause sympathetic symptoms.
Neither does the TQL block spread to the lumbar plexus, and therefore does not cause motor
weakness of the lower extremities. However these notions have never been properly
investigated in a controlled clinical setting, meaning that the investigators cannot entirely
rule out the possibility of a spread to the lumbar plexus and thus ensuing quadriceps muscle
weakness. This calls for a more in-depth investigation of this potential phenomenon.
Therefore, the aim of this study is to examine whether the administration of the TQL block
cause motor block of the lumbar plexus and thereby quadriceps muscle weakness.
Prior to block administration all participants are tested using the same motor tests as after
the block administration(baseline tests).
All participants will receive two TQL blocks. To keep participants and outcome assessors
blinded the study drug for each side will be randomised i.e. active treatment on one side and
placebo on the contralateral side.
The investigators hypothesise that the administration of a unilateral TQL block does not
cause quadriceps muscle weakness compared to a placebo block.
Sub-study:
Fascial plane nerve blocks demand a great volume of local anaesthetic to achieve the right
spread of local anaesthetic and thus a sufficient analgesia.
The correct concentration and volume of local anaesthetic is still debated. Studies measuring
serum concentrations of local anaesthetic are rare due to time consumption and high costs.
When administering a unilateral TQL block a volume of 30 ml local anaesthetic is used often
equal to the maximum single-shot dose of ropivacaine; i.e. 225 milligrams. In previous
studies and in the usual clinical setting the investigators have never experienced any signs
of systemic toxicity, however the maximum serum concentration of local anaesthetic following
TQL block administration has never been investigated. The maximum serum ropivacaine
concentration following administration of a TQL block will therefore be investigated for all
participants.