View clinical trials related to Nephrolithiasis.
Filter by:Randomized comparison of patient outcomes following fluoroscopic guided PCNL versus ultrasound-guided PCNL.
Evaluation of a nonopioid recovery pathway after percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a pragmatic pilot study that will apply the knowledge and experience gained with development of an outpatient opioid reduction protocol to percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). We have previously demonstrated that outpatient ureteroscopy and stent placement without postoperative opioid prescriptions is possible in the vast majority of patients. The success of this is dependent upon a multimodal approach to the patient's experience of undergoing endoscopic kidney stone surgery (ureteroscopy) and focuses on the preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative stages of intervention. Our hypothesis is that a novel nonopioid pathway after PCNL is both feasible and safe and will reduce postoperative prescriptions for opioids without impacting clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction or outpatient resources.
This is a single-center study that aims to better understand how diet and sex affect the risk of kidney stones in people who have had gastric bypass surgery. Subjects will be asked to follow a special (clinic-provided) diet for six days and come to a research clinic for 3 study visits.
To study the Effectiveness of single use flexible Ureteroscopes in treatment of renal stones
There is no consensus about the required time intervals between repeated SWL sessions applied for renal stones with some centers waiting for 3 days, others for one week and others up to one month to repeat lithotripsy. In the 2019 EUA guidelines stated that "There are no conclusive data on the intervals required between repeated SWL sessions. However, clinical experience indicates that repeat sessions are feasible (within 1 day for ureteral stones). The intense use of ESWL currently, the lack of knowledge about acute lesions caused by re-treatment within a short time interval and the empirical way by which treatment is conducted, stimulated us to search for a precise answers to the question What the ideal time interval between SWL sessions in the treatment of renal stone patients should be. This randomized controlled trial will be conducted at Urology and Nephrology Center in Mansoura, Egypt. Patients more than 18 years old with single primary renal stone fulfilling inclusion criteria will be randomly allocated to 3 groups (50 patients each).Group 1 will undergo SWL with 3 days between each session. Group 2 will undergo SWL with 7 days between each session and Group 3 will undergo SWL with 14 days between each session. Study parameters will be renal damage including the following items: - Tubular damage will be assessed through estimation of changes in urinary excretion of renal tubular enzyme kidney injury molecule 1(KIM-1). - Glomerular damage will be assessed by estimation of proteinuria and changes in GFR calculated by renal isotope scan. - Renal morphological and haemodynamic changes. - Treatment success is defined as clinically insignificant residual fragments less than 4 mm size.
The desire to reduce complications related to percutaneous access and morbidity related to tract size has led researchers to evaluate PCNL using smaller-caliber instruments. In this context, mini-PCNL has emerged. Its efficacy and safety have been demonstrated at the cost of a lower stone-free rate. The effectiveness of existing Ho: YAG lasers is limited by the need for manual removal of stone fragments and mobilization of them due to the lack of a simultaneous aspiration system. Consequently, this has been associated with long surgical times to achieve stone-free status. This requires multiple insertions and extractions of the nephroscope to facilitate the recovery of all fragments. This repeated step can cause the safety rails to be inadvertently removed or the sheaths to be disinserted. Sometimes compromising surgical results. Faced with this situation, the search for better and more efficient energy sources still continues. With this, modern lithotripters have emerged that combine energy sources and work more efficiently than any of them independently and, consequently, improve stone removal. Cyberwand ™ (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), Swiss Lithoclast® Master / Select (EMS SA, Switzerland / Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) and Shockpulse-SE ™ (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) are some examples; although they have their own set of advantages, none have proven to be superior to any other. As previously discussed, ballistic-ultrasonic lithotripsy combines ultrasonic and ballistic energy together with a suction system with encouraging results in terms of a shorter lithotripsy time and the respective economic impact of fewer surgical events and less operating time required for the stone removal. Therefore, it is convenient to make a comparison between the results of lithotripsy with Ho: YAG laser energy and lithotripsy with LithoClast Trilogy EMS; and thereby determine which is the most effective method in the resolution of kidney stones through a miniaturized percutaneous tract.
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a first-line treatment for kidney stones >2cm. Frequently, patients require multiple procedures to address their stone burden. The decision to proceed with a second-look procedure is based on follow-up CT imaging, which is obtained postoperatively. In this study, we propose the use of a portable CT scan technology to obtain follow-up imaging while the patient is still under anesthesia for the initial procedure. The goal of this study is to determine whether this allows the surgeon to identify residual fragments and render the patient stone-free within a single anesthetic event.
Kidney stone disease has become a common phenomenon in the US and Europe with a growing incidence of about 10%. Life style and dietary changes have a cardinal part in kidney stone prevention. Therefore it was only natural to determine the impact of the addition of a nutritionist to a stone clinic run by a urologist and a nephrologist.
Flexible ureteroscopy is characterized as first-line therapy for the treatment of renal stones < 2 cm in size. This involves passing a flexible endoscope into the renal pelvis through the urethra, bladder and ureter in a retrograde fashion. Holmium: YAG laser remains the preferred energy modality to subsequently break stones of this size into fragments small enough to remove or pass spontaneously through the ureter. Advances in the understanding of laser energy delivery have led to the recent commercialization of the "Moses Effect" - the creation of vapor bubbles/cavities between the laser fiber tip and the target through which laser energy can more efficiently travel. Lumenis was the first to optimize this laser phenomenon and market it as "Moses Technology" in their Lumenis Pulse P120H laser system. This system is already FDA approved through the 510K pathway and is commercially available. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the potential of Moses laser technology to reduce operative time compared to non-Moses settings for ureteroscopic treatment of nephrolithiasis.
This study will assess patients who have recurrent urinary tract infections and kidney stones which are not blocking the kidney or causing other problems. Currently, we don't know if taking out these stones will improve recurrent urinary tract infections or not. Patients will make a decision with their surgeon about removing or monitoring their stone(s). Whether or not their infections continue with surgery or monitoring will be noted, and this information may help to inform future treatment decisions. The purpose of this study is to assess if treatment of these asymptomatic stones affects the rate of recurrent urinary tract infections.