View clinical trials related to Neoplasms.
Filter by:CAR-T cells (Chimeric Antigen Receptor) are a new immunotherapy, based on the genetic modification of autologous T lymphocytes. CAR-T cell therapy is not devoid of complications. Among the most frequent complications are the risk of infection, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity. Nevertheless, some authors have reported serious acute cardiac events in a limited number of patients, often contemporaneous with CRS or sepsis, questioning the imputability of CAR-T cells in this heart disease. This study aims to estimate the incidence of a possible early cardiotoxicity associated with CAR-T cells. The main endpoint will be the change in cardiac function (LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction) assessed by ultrasound between the pre CAR-T assessment and the early post CAR-T ultrasound (D3-D5).
The aim of this mixed-methods study is to describe both the implementation process and outcomes of the online module Advance Care Plan for (hemato-)oncology patients within the oncology-network CONCORD. The main question is: How is implementation and assurance of the advance care plan in daily care for (hemato-)oncological patients within CONCORD achieved, so that early integration of advance care planning in oncological care takes place and patient preferences are discussed? Healthcare providers and patients are asked to use the module and share their experiences with it.
This study consists of two research phases: Phase Ib (includes dose escalation phase and efficacy extension phase): To explore the safety, tolerability and initial efficacy of SHR-A1904 in the treatment of CLDN18.2-positive advanced solid tumors, and to determine the recommended dose and recommended population for the Phase III combination study. Phase III: A randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical study of SHR-1904 combined with chemotherapy and immunotherapy Versus chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy for CLDN18.2-positive advanced solid tumors.
This study is an open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation, and extended-enrollment nonrandomized phase I study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic characteristics, and preliminary efficacy of BL-M05D1 in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether the addition of spinal analgesia leads to superior recovery in patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic upper urinary tract surgery under general anesthesia. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Is the decrease in wellbeing as quantified by the patient-centered outcome scale "Quality of Recovery 15" (QoR-15), from baseline to the first day after surgery (POD 1), at least 8.0 points less in patients receiving spinal analgesia in addition to general anesthesia? - Does spinal analgesia result in improved recovery as quantified by QoR-15 at POD 7, the incidence of postoperative pain at rest and at mobilization, nausea and vomiting, the need for opioid analgesics, time out-of-bed, length of stay and the incidence of complications? - Does spinal analgesia increase workload in the OR, as quantified by time from arrival in the OR to start of surgery? - Does spinal analgesia result in an increased incidence of hypotension and cardiac dysfunction during surgery, as well as an increased incidence of pruritus after surgery? Participants will be randomized to receive either spinal analgesia with bupivacaine and morphine preoperatively or an intravenous infusion with lidocaine intraoperatively. QoR-15 and other markers of recovery will be registered using structured interviews preoperatively, at POD1 and POD7. In addition, patients will record pain at rest and at mobilization three times daily in a diary. In a subgroup of patients advanced hemodynamic parameters will be recorded using pulse-contour analysis before, during and after surgery. Blood samples will also be collected in these patients at fixed intervals and analyzed for amongst others inflammation and cardiac dysfunction.
The primary purpose of this study is to determine the sensitivity of CYBRID Score for predicting in-vivo clinical response based on surgical response or RECIST 1.1 for neoadjuvant and locally advanced/metastatic patients, respectively. The secondary purposes is to determine the sensitivity of the CYBRID Score for predicting in-vivo clinical response based on surgical response or RECIST 1.1 for neoadjuvant and locally advanced/metastatic patients, respectively.
This is a Phase 1/2 multicenter, multi-regional, open-label, first-in-human study of IBI3001 in participants with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors. It includes a Phase 1 section to identify Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)/Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) of IBI3001, and a Phase 2 section to explore and confirm the efficacy, safety and tolerability of IBI3001 at its RP2D.
This is an open-label, dose escalation, phase I study to evaluate safety tolerability, MTD or MFD, pharmacokinetic profile, immunogenicity, and pharmacodynamic profile of IDOV-SAFETM in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Phase I/II open label, multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MHB039A in advanced malignant tumors.
This study includes two stage: dose escalation and dose extension, with a single dose and a multiple dose study. This is a single-center, open, non-randomized, single arm, study to evaluate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of TQB3006 tables in patients with advanced malignant cancer.