Study of Cryoablation for Metastatic Lung Tumors

Neoplasm Metastasis Clinical Trial

— SOLSTICE  

Official title:

Multicenter Study of Metastatic Lung Tumors Targeted by Interventional Cryoablation Evaluation

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01957787
• Other study ID #: CUC13-LNG079
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: April 10, 2014
• Est. completion date: August 20, 2018

Study information

• Verified date: July 2021
• Source: Boston Scientific Corporation
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cryoablation therapy used to treat tumors in participants with pulmonary metastatic disease. This study is to enroll participants who will undergo cryoablation of at least 1 metastatic pulmonary tumor that is less than or equal to 3.5 centimeter (cm). Participants will be followed 24 months post their cryoablation procedure.

Description:

Treatment for pulmonary metastatic disease may include surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or a combination of treatments. However, several variables may exclude participants from these treatments such as multiple tumors, multiple previous surgeries, pulmonary dysfunction, or co-morbid medical conditions. For these participants, percutaneous cryoablation may be a suitable option.

Ablation of metastatic lung tumors is a rapidly expanding area within interventional oncology. Cryotherapy, radiofrequency, laser, and microwave have all been shown to be effective. Cryotherapy offers a wide range of anatomic and tumor treatment options because of the ability to visualize the ice under imaging guidance and the preservation of collagenous tissue structure. Cryoablation has been extensively performed in the prostate and kidney with favorable outcomes reported in the literature. More recently, cryoablation has been shown to be safe in the treatment of lung tumors with CT guidance.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 131
• Est. completion date: August 20, 2018
• Est. primary completion date: March 9, 2017
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Participant must be at least 18 years old.

• Participant has signed a written informed consent.

• Participant presents with Stage 4 pulmonary metastatic disease with metastatic disease previously confirmed by prior biopsy; or Participant presents with Stage 4 pulmonary metastatic disease previously confirmed on imaging (for example, computerized tomography or CT) with histology proven primary cancer.

• Participant has up to 6 local pulmonary metastases targetable by cryoablation.

• Targeted index tumor(s) defined as intra pulmonary or pleural with a maximum size of 3.5 cm, measured in the longest cross-sectional dimension.

• The target index tumor(s) is determined (by CT images) to be in a location where cryoablation is technically achievable based on the proximity of adjacent organs/ structures and is greater than 0.5 cm from any critical organ/structure (possibly achieved with additional maneuvers such as iatrogenic pneumothorax or hydrodissection).

• Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score greater than or equal to 60.

• Platelet count greater than 50,000/millimeters (mm)^3 within 8 weeks prior to initial cryoablation procedure.

• International Normalized Ratio (INR) less than 1.5 within 8 weeks prior to initial cryoablation procedure.

• Participant has a life expectancy of greater than 3 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Participant's index tumor(s) is primary lung cancer.

• Participant has uncontrollable primary or metastatic disease outside of the lung.

• Participant is unable to lie flat or has respiratory distress at rest.

• Participant has a coagulopathy or bleeding disorder which is uncontrolled.

• Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) <1000 within 8 weeks prior to initial cryoablation procedure.

• Participant has evidence of active systemic, pulmonary, or pericardial infection.

• Participant has a debilitating medical or psychiatric illness that would preclude giving informed consent or receiving optimal treatment or follow up.

• Participant is currently participating in other experimental studies that could affect the primary endpoint (for example, experimental chemotherapy regimen).

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Lung Neoplasms
• Neoplasm Metastasis

Intervention

Device:
• Cryoablation
Application of extremely cold temperatures to the identified tumor(s).

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
France	Institut Bergonié	Bordeaux	Aquitaine
France	Institut Gustave Roussy	Villejuif	Ile-de-France
United States	Inova Alexandria Hospital CVIR	Alexandria	Virginia
United States	UCLA Ronald Reagan Medical Center	Los Angeles	California
United States	Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center	New York	New York
United States	New York Presbyterian Hospital - Cornell Medical Center	New York	New York
United States	Cancer Treatment Centers of America at Southeastern Regional Medical Center	Newnan	Georgia
United States	Rhode Island Hospital	Providence	Rhode Island
United States	Mayo Clinic Rochester	Rochester	Minnesota
United States	State University of New York at Stony Brook	Stony Brook	New York

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Boston Scientific Corporation

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  France, 

References & Publications (8)

Ahmed A, Littrup P. Percutaneous cryotherapy of the thorax: safety considerations for complex cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Jun;186(6):1703-6. — View Citation

Asimakopoulos G, Beeson J, Evans J, Maiwand MO. Cryosurgery for malignant endobronchial tumors: analysis of outcome. Chest. 2005 Jun;127(6):2007-14. — View Citation

Gillams A. Lung tumour ablation - where are we now? Cancer Imaging. 2008 Apr 22;8:116-7. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2008.0015. — View Citation

Inoue M, Nakatsuka S, Yashiro H, Ito N, Izumi Y, Yamauchi Y, Hashimoto K, Asakura K, Tsukada N, Kawamura M, Nomori H, Kuribayashi S. Percutaneous cryoablation of lung tumors: feasibility and safety. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012 Mar;23(3):295-302; quiz 305. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2011.11.019. Epub 2012 Jan 20. — View Citation

Kawamura M, Izumi Y, Tsukada N, Asakura K, Sugiura H, Yashiro H, Nakano K, Nakatsuka S, Kuribayashi S, Kobayashi K. Percutaneous cryoablation of small pulmonary malignant tumors under computed tomographic guidance with local anesthesia for nonsurgical candidates. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 May;131(5):1007-13. — View Citation

Pusceddu C, Sotgia B, Fele RM, Melis L. CT-guided thin needles percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) in patients with primary and secondary lung tumors: a preliminary experience. Eur J Radiol. 2013 May;82(5):e246-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.12.010. Epub 2013 Feb 8. — View Citation

Wang H, Littrup PJ, Duan Y, Zhang Y, Feng H, Nie Z. Thoracic masses treated with percutaneous cryotherapy: initial experience with more than 200 procedures. Radiology. 2005 Apr;235(1):289-98. — View Citation

Yamauchi Y, Izumi Y, Kawamura M, Nakatsuka S, Yashiro H, Tsukada N, Inoue M, Asakura K, Nomori H. Percutaneous cryoablation of pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027086. Epub 2011 Nov 9. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor at Month 18 and Month 24	Local tumor control defined as the absence of local treatment failure 18 and 24 months following study cryoablation based on site-reported data. Local control was achieved if the 3-axis measurement (that is, the greatest trans-axial diameter plus the 2 perpendicular diameters) of a tumor at Month 12 was less than 20% larger than the 3-axis measurement of the tumor at Month 1 following study cryoablation. A separate evaluation of local tumor control at Month 12 following cryoablation was completed per index tumor. Month 1 data served as the baseline for this analysis; if Month 1 data was missing, Month 3 data were used. Tumors with a local failure at the prior study visit and those with repeat cryoablation procedures prior to Month 12 were counted as failures. Imaging for assessment of tumor measurements was performed using CT or 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-CT with or without contrast.	Month 1 (Month 3 if Month 1 Data was missing), Month 18 and Month 24
Other	Overall Participant Survival Post-cryoablation	Overall survival rate was defined as the time in days from the first cryoablation procedure to death. Participants who were alive were censored at the date of the last visit.	Up to Month 24
Other	Time to Metastatic Lung Disease Progression Beyond the Index Tumor(s)	Time to metastatic lung disease progression beyond the index tumor was defined as the time in days from the first cryoablation procedure to metastatic disease beyond the index tumor site. Participants without metastatic lung disease progression were censored at the date of their last visit or their date of death (due to any cause).	Up to Month 24
Other	Time to Overall Cancer Progression	Time to overall cancer progression was defined as the time in days from the first cryoablation procedure to cancer progression (that is, any location of active cancer disease). Participants without cancer progression were censored at the date of their last visit or their date of death (due to any cause).	Up to Month 24
Other	Local Tumor Control With Additional Cryoablation Galil Medical Technology Treatment(s) of a Previously Treated Index Tumor	Local tumor control, defined as absence of local treatment failure 12 months following study cryoablation based on site-reported data, was achieved if 3-axis measurement (that is, greatest trans-axial diameter plus 2 perpendicular diameters) of a tumor at Month 12 was <20% larger than 3-axis measurement of the tumor at Month 1 following study cryoablation. Separate evaluation of local tumor control at Month 12 following cryoablation was completed per index tumor. Follow-up visits were re-started after additional treatment, per study protocol and continued through the Month 24 visit after the last study cryoablation. Month 1 data served as baseline for analysis; if Month 1 data was missing, Month 3 data were used. Tumors with a local failure at prior study visit and with repeat cryoablation procedures prior to Month 12 were counted as failures. Tumor measurement imaging performed using CT or 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-CT with or without contrast.	Up to Month 12
Other	Time to Untreatable Metastatic Lung Disease Control With Cryoablation (Free From Metastatic Lung Disease)	Time to untreatable metastatic lung disease control with cryoablation is defined as the time in days from the first cryoablation procedure to the time when the metastatic lung disease cannot be treated with cryoablation. The percentage of participants free from metastatic disease that is untreatable with cryoablation at the intervals of time of Days 181 to 365 and Days 495 to 730 is presented.	Month 12 (Days 181-365) and Month 24 (Days 495-730)
Other	Time to Untreatable Metastatic Lung Disease Control With Focal Therapy (Free From Metastatic Lung Disease)	Time to untreatable metastatic lung disease control with focal therapy defined as the time in days from the first cryoablation procedure to the time when the metastatic lung disease cannot be treated by focal (for example, ablation, surgery, SBRT) intervention for control of metastatic lung disease. The percentage of participants free from metastatic disease that is untreatable with focal therapy at the intervals of time of Days 181 to 365 and Days 495 to 730 is presented.	Month 12 (Days 181-365) and Month 24 (Days 495-730)
Other	Cryoablation Technical Success at Month 1	A technically successful treatment was defined by the presence of an ablation zone, ground glass opacity, or frank consolidation encompassing the targeted index tumor(s) at no later than the 1 month follow up visit after the cryoablation procedure. Technical success rates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random effects logistic regression on a tumor level.	Up to Month 1
Other	Change From Baseline in Physical Function as Assessed by the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Scale at Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24	The KPS scale is a standard way of measuring the ability of cancer participants to perform ordinary tasks. KPS may be used to determine a participant's prognosis and to measure changes in a participant's ability to function. Assessments were made by examining the change in the baseline scores to those reported post-operatively. KPS scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score means the participant is better able to carry out daily activities.	Baseline, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, and Month 24
Other	Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Over Time as Assessed by the Short Form-12 (SF-12) Generic Measure at Month 1 and Month 3	The SF-12 is a shortened version of the well-known SF-36. The SF-12 assesses 8 domains (physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, bodily pain, social functioning, general mental health, role limitations due to emotional problems, vitality, general health perception). The shorter instrument provides a general measurement of quality of life. Assessments were made by examining the change in the baseline scores to those reported post-operatively. The scores range from 0 to 100. A higher value indicates a better quality of life of the participant.	Baseline, Month 1 and Month 3
Primary	Local Tumor Control for Each Index Tumor as Measured by Imaging at Month 12	Local tumor control defined as the absence of local treatment failure 12 months following study cryoablation based on site-reported data. Local control was achieved if the 3-axis measurement (that is, the greatest trans-axial diameter plus the 2 perpendicular diameters) of a tumor at Month 12 was less than 20% larger than the 3-axis measurement of the tumor at Month 1 following study cryoablation. A separate evaluation of local tumor control at Month 12 following cryoablation was completed per index tumor. Month 1 data served as the baseline for this analysis; if Month 1 data was missing, Month 3 data were used. Tumors with a local failure at the prior study visit and those with repeat cryoablation procedures prior to Month 12 were counted as failures. Imaging for assessment of tumor measurements was performed using CT or 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-CT with or without contrast.	Month 1 (Month 3 if Month 1 Data was missing) and Month 12
Secondary	Number of Participants With an Intra- or Post-operative Adverse Event, a Serious Adverse Event, or an Unanticipated Adverse Device Effect	The number of participants with the following categories of adverse events is presented: an intra-operative, a post-operative, a serious adverse event, or an unanticipated adverse device effect. The adverse events that are presented are related to the cryoablation procedure. A summary of serious and all other non-serious adverse events, regardless of causality, is located in the Reported Adverse Events module.	Baseline up to 30 days post-cryoablation