Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

A comparison between the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy and the efficacy of standard care dressing


Clinical Trial Description

The aim of our study is to compare the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy (Prevena) and standard clinical dressing in terms of prevention of postoperative surgical site infection, length of hospital stay, and total cost of hospitalization among vascular, plastic and general surgery patients. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT03566641
Study type Interventional
Source University of Toledo
Contact
Status Withdrawn
Phase N/A
Start date April 28, 2018
Completion date April 15, 2019

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT02892435 - Prevena™ Incision Management System vs Conventional Management for Wound Healing Phase 2
Recruiting NCT04618406 - The Effect of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Wound Healing in Major Amputations of the Lower Limb N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT01603901 - Regulated Negative Pressure-Assisted Wound Therapy Device N/A
Terminated NCT04026334 - Evaluation of V.A.C. VERAFLO CLEANSE CHOICE™ Dressing Using Normal Saline to Promote Increased Healthy Wound Bed Tissue N/A
Completed NCT02682316 - Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Post-Operative Incision Management Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05716503 - Comparison Between Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and Conventional Wound Dressings Before and After Split-Thickness Skin Grafting in Diabetic Foot Wounds N/A
Recruiting NCT02901613 - Prophylactic Post-Cesarean Incisional Negative-pressure Wound Therapy in Morbidly Obese Patients N/A
Completed NCT02526342 - Impact of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Free Muscle Flaps N/A