View clinical trials related to Myeloproliferative Disorders.
Filter by:This research is being done to learn whether drug called itacitinib, which is a novel inflammation- and immune-lowering drug (immunosuppressant), can be given before and after non-myeloablative peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT; also known as a 'mini' transplant) to help prevent certain complications such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) for patients with blood cancers, using peripheral blood from a relative. The investigators will also examine if by using itacitinib the investigators can reduce the duration of MMF (other immune suppressive drug administration posttransplant).
This is a Phase II study following subjects proceeding with our Institutional non-myeloablative cyclophosphamide/ fludarabine/total body irradiation (TBI) preparative regimen followed by a related, unrelated, or partially matched family donor stem cell infusion using post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy), sirolimus and MMF GVHD prophylaxis.
The goal of this interventional study is to evaluate if pre-emptive intervention using Azacitidine and / or donor lymphocytes or tapering of immune suppression in measurable residual disease (MRD) positive subjects can prevent clinical relapse. Participants will undergo MRD surveillance and be subjected to intervention in case of MRD positivity. Results will be compared with NMDSG14B, part one, in which MRD was analyzed in included patients without recieving intervention.
The aim of the study is to evaluate the expression pattern of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein H1 (HNRNPH1) and K (HNRNPK) genes in Myeloproliferative neoplasms as a possible indicator of disease progression and as a potential therapeutic target
The purpose of this study is to learn about the impact that the services and programs provided by the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society have among patients with blood cancer, such as access to care, quality of life, and financial burden.
The purpose of the study is to see if participants with anemia due to their type of MDS or MDS/MPN will experience a more decreased need for regular blood transfusions if they take luspatercept plus best supportive care, and what effect, good and/or bad, luspatercept has on them and their anemia due to MDS or MDS/MPN. The safety and tolerability of luspatercept will also be evaluated in this study.
Standard cytogenetics (CBA +/- FISH) is of diagnostic and prognostic interest in Ph- MPN. However, its value is limited by the low frequency of detected abnormalities. The development of tools to increase the sensitivity of detection of chromosomal alterations is therefore particularly adapted to these pathologies. Optical genome mapping (OGM) is a high resolution "long read" technique that allows the identification of structural and copy number variations at the whole genome level. Several recent studies suggest that OGM is a future tool for cytogenetic characterization of haematological disorders. Its ability to describe structural abnormalities, including balanced ones, represents a major advantage over currently used technologies. Thus, OGM seems to be the key tool for cytogenetics of haematological malignancies in the coming years, making it possible to replace, under certain conditions, not only karyotype and FISH, but CMA and even RT-MLPA for the search for fusion transcripts, thus filling in the gaps in these techniques while maintaining their advantages. To define the place of this technology in Ph- MPN, the investigators will perform a OGM analysis on patients with Ph-MPN for whom bone marrow exploration is scheduled. These results will be compared with those of standard cytogenetics (CBA +/- FISH).
This is a multicenter, Phase 2 Simon 2-Stage study designed to assess the safety, tolerability, PK, and efficacy of oral zelavespib (PU-H71) administered daily in adults with accelerated phase (10% to 19% blasts in peripheral or bone marrow) myeloproliferative neoplasm, with or without ongoing concomitant treatment with ruxolitinib.
This phase II trial tests whether decitabine and cedazuridine (ASTX727) in combination with venetoclax work better than ASTX727 alone at decreasing symptoms of bone marrow cancer in patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN) with excess blasts. Blasts are immature blood cells. Decitabine is in a class of medications called hypomethylation agents. It works by helping the bone marrow produce normal blood cells and by killing abnormal cells in the bone marrow. Cobimetinib is used in patients whose cancer has a mutated (changed) form of a gene called BRAF. It is in a class of medications called kinase inhibitors. It works by blocking the action of an abnormal protein that signals cancer cells to multiply. This helps slow or stop the spread of cancer cells. Venetoclax is in a class of medications called B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitors. It may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking Bcl-2, a protein needed for cancer cell survival. The combination of ASTX727 and venetoclax may be more effective in reducing the cancer signs and symptoms in patients with CMML, or MDS/MPN with excess blasts.
This phase II MyeloMATCH treatment trial compares cytarabine versus (vs.) cytarabine and venetoclax vs. liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine and venetoclax vs. azacitidine and venetoclax for treating patients who have residual disease after treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Cytarabine is in a class of medications called antimetabolites. It works by slowing or stopping the growth of cancer cells in the body. Venetoclax is in a class of medications called B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitors. It may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking Bcl-2, a protein needed for cancer cell survival. Liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine is a drug formulation that delivers daunorubicin and cytarabine in small spheres called liposomes, which may make the drugs safer or more effective. Azacitidine is a drug that interacts with DNA and leads to the activation of tumor suppressor genes, which are genes that help control cell growth. This study may help the study doctors find out if the different drug combinations are equally effective to the usual approach of cytarabine alone while requiring a shorter duration of treatment. To decide if they are better, the study doctors will be looking to see if the study drugs lead to a higher percentage of patients achieving a deeper remission compared to cytarabine alone.