View clinical trials related to Musculoskeletal Diseases.
Filter by:This is a prospective, single-center, observational clinical trial at the Department of Women's Health of the University Hospital Tübingen.
Today, there is a relationship between the increase in the use of electronic devices such as smartphones or tablets and musculoskeletal disorders. Different usage styles of various electronic devices such as laptops, smartphones and tablets affect the risk factors that may be related to musculoskeletal disorders in office workers. In addition to the use of electronic devices, the posture of the office worker's head, waist and hands while sitting are among the risk factors. Parameters such as the features of the chair he is sitting on, the height and distance of the table affect the person's posture. Evaluation of these factors is important in preventing musculoskeletal disorders. The Ergonomic Risk Assessment for Musculoskeletal Disorders in Office Workers was developed by Kluay-On et al. in 2022 and its validity and reliability were established. The aim of our study is to culturally adapt the Ergonomic Risk Assessment for Musculoskeletal Disorders in Office Workers into Turkish and to examine its validity and reliability.
Shoulder pain is the third most common type of musculoskeletal (MSK) disorder for which people seek medical care. Roughly 70% of all shoulder pain can be accounted for by one condition, namely rotator ruff-related shoulder pain (RCRSP). Despite limited research it is thought that a lack of pain-free force production of certain shoulder muscles is a key finding in those with RCRSP. Strengthening exercise appears to be an important treatment for RCRSP. However, there remains uncertainty regarding the optimal choice of exercise. It has been suggested essential to target the rotator cuff muscles. Despite this claim, exercise specific to these muscles has not been compared to exercise that specifically avoids significant rotator cuff recruitment. A clearer understanding could result in more effective treatment, and improved exercise adherence. Key questions that this research aims to answer are: 1. Is it important to measure pain-free force when treating people with RCRSP? 2. Is it more effective to target the rotator cuff muscles than not when using exercise to treat RCRSP? To attempt to answer these questions this study will be split into two trials. Patients referred to Sussex Community NHS Foundation trust for treatment of RCRSP will be screened by a Physiotherapist for eligibility and those interested will be asked to give consent to participate. Trial 1 will involve participants attending a one-off 45-minute assessment. Data collection will run over a 6-month period. Participants in Trial 2 will be required to attend a minimum of 10 (or maximum of 12) 45-minute exercise sessions over a 12-16-week period. Trail 2 will last approximately 18 months, with outcomes being recorded when participants finish their exercise sessions and at 6 and 12 months after the date they started the trial.
The assessment of pain plays a crucial role in pain management. Nurses are instrumental in the identification, evaluation, and initiation of pain management strategies. In the literature, it is strongly recommended to provide education about postoperative pain management to patients, their families, and those responsible for patient care. Additionally, the development of a pain management plan and goals is advocated. The optimal timing, content, and objectives of patient education depend on the type of pain (acute or chronic), the availability and effectiveness of treatment, and the patient's level of education and literacy. Educating individuals undergoing elective surgery or outpatient treatment about the likelihood and magnitude of acute pain they may experience, as well as informing them about available methods to prevent or alleviate this pain, is critical for pain management. Shindo et al. conducted a study suggesting that perioperative pain education significantly reduces postoperative opioid use. According to the Health Belief Model, an individual's perception of health is influenced by their perception of the value of health, beliefs about illness, and beliefs about the consequences of illness. Therefore, when a patient's health beliefs and attitudes are determined, health education and treatment planning can be tailored more appropriately.
Fibromyalgia is a chronic and intricate musculoskeletal disorder characterized by widespread pain, fatigue, and tenderness in specific anatomical regions. Although its prevalence varies among populations, understanding the prevalence in different geographical areas is crucial for healthcare planning. This cross-sectional study aims to determine the prevalence of fibromyalgia in adults residing in Al-Karak, Jordan. The city's unique demographic and environmental characteristics may influence the occurrence of fibromyalgia among its adult population. The study aims to address gaps in knowledge, provide localized insights, and shed light on fibromyalgia's burden on the community's health. Accurate prevalence data aids healthcare planning and resource allocation.
The goal of this observational study is to learn about patients' preference toward the use of customized and connected prosthesis. The main questions it aims to answer are: - What is the acceptability of new customization and connectivity technologies by patients? - Are they all at the same level of acceptability? Participants will have to answer to a questionnaire of choice.
The study design was a randomised, controlled, parallel, two-arm trial. The subjects were randomly assigned to one of the study groups: the intervention group or the control group. The passive mechanical properties, i.e. the stiffness and tone of the medial and lateral gastrocnemius muscle (dominant leg) were assessed. Measures were taken twice: in the intervention group before and after the 5-minute massage session, and in the control group at the beginning of the meeting and again after 5 minutes.
The goal of this study is to better understand the experiences of adolescents with physical disabilities and assess the effectiveness of a Character Strengths Intervention (CSI) in improving their self-esteem, character strengths, and mental health. We will also compare these outcomes between two groups: one receiving the intervention and the other not receiving any treatment. Main Research Questions: How do adolescents with physical disabilities perceive their self-esteem, character strengths, and mental health, including psychological adjustment, psychological distress, psychological wellbeing, life satisfaction, and resilience? Can the Character Strengths Intervention (CSI) enhance the self-esteem, character strengths, and mental health (psychological adjustment and distress) of adolescents with physical disabilities? Study Tasks: Participants, who are adolescents aged 12-18 years, will be asked to provide informed consent to participate in the study. They will complete questionnaires to assess their self-esteem, character strengths, and mental health as a pre-assessment. Participants in the intervention group will undergo the Character Strengths Intervention (CSI), which includes activities like exploring character strengths, writing gratitude letters, and practicing fresh look meditation, among others. After the intervention, participants will complete post-assessment questionnaires to measure changes in self-esteem, character strengths, and mental health. There will be a control group that does not receive any treatment. Comparison Group: Researchers will compare the outcomes between the intervention group, who received the Character Strengths Intervention (CSI), and the control group, who did not receive any treatment. This will help us determine if the intervention had a significant impact on self-esteem, character strengths, and mental health outcomes for adolescents with physical disabilities.
A pilot Single-Arm, Multicenter, Prospective, Post-Market 6 months Follow-Up Clinical Investigation to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Blueprint Mixed Reality HOLOBLUEPRINT™ (HOLOBLUEPRINT™).
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two methods of managing low acuity musculoskeletal complaints in children and adolescents ages 6 to 17.99 years in the pediatric emergency department. The main question it aims to answer is whether delivering care in two methods is feasible. Participants will receive care while in the emergency department and will be followed for a period of 1-month post-presentation.