View clinical trials related to Multiple Myeloma.
Filter by:Retrospective study based on medical records of patients with multiple myeloma, eligible for stem cell transplantation, who received, first-line, the VTD or TD combination.
The goal of this phase II, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study is to evaluate i) the efficacy and ii) safety of elranatamab monotherapy at the dose of 76 mg subcutaneously in participants with RRMM after at least one or two prior lines of therapy who have received prior treatment with immunomodulatory drugs, protease inhibitors, and anti-CD38 therapy and were refractory to the last line of therapy, defined as progression while receiving treatment or in the first 60 days after the last dose of treatment. Efficacy refers to the rate of Undetectable Measurable Residual Disease at 6 and 12 months as per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria evaluated by the investigators. Safety refers to the measurement of: i) Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) according to standard clinical and laboratory tests (hematology and chemistry, physical examination, vital sign measurements, and diagnostic tests). ii) Incidence and severity of Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) and Immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) according to the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) criteria. iii) Incidence and severity of other neurotoxicities. iv) Incidence of cytopenias and infections The study consists of a screening/baseline period, a treatment period, and a posttreatment follow-up period. The study includes a periodic review of safety data, that will be independently analyzed by the Data Safety Independent Committee (DSMC) and will recommend how to proceed with the study.
The primary purpose of this study is to see if individuals with Multiple Myeloma are able and interested in taking part in a tailored exercise program while undergoing their chemotherapy prior to a stem cell transplant. We also hope to learn if this type of program, along with a flexible delivery format (in-person and virtual), helps in maintaining or improving physical fitness, muscle mass and strength, and quality of life during chemotherapy.
The clinical trial was designed as a single-arm, open-label clinical study, with the main purpose of exploring the safety, pharmacokinetics, and best recommended dose (RP2D) of the UTAA17 injection in the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (r/r MM) subjects, and also the efficacy will be observed. Eligible subjects will accept the infusion of UTAA17 injection after pretreatment, and their blood will be collected before and after infusion for evaluation of pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity and safety. This study plans to evaluate efficacy using the revised Evaluation of Efficacy in multiple myeloma -IMWG criteria (2016), which will be evaluated at 4w, 2m, 3m, 6m, and 6 to 24m (at a frequency of Q3m) after cell reinfusion, in addition to the baseline period. Efficacy evaluation continues until one of the following occurs: subject disease progression (PD), acceptance of a new antitumor therapy, death, occurrence of intolerable toxicity, investigator decision, or patient decision to withdraw.
The is a first clinical study for Oricell Therapeutics Inc. in the United States to evaluate the safety, PK, PD and preliminary efficacy of our anti-GPRC5D cell product (OriCAR-017) in subjects with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. RIGEL Study
This study if for people who have been diagnosed with multiple myeloma and their doctors are recommending radiation to help treat it. Typically, radiation consists of 2-3 weeks of external beam radiation therapy. Doctors leading this study would like to see if a shorter radiation course (i.e., hypofractionation) for pelvic radiation is safe for multiple myeloma. Because participants in this study will receive a shortened radiation course, each daily treatment dose that is delivered would be slightly higher than normal. This higher daily dose would be delivered because the study team would like to see if higher doses of radiation are as safe given over a shorter number of days compared to 2-3 weeks. The purpose of this study is to make sure that hypofractionation is safe and effective for individuals with multiple myeloma.
Return to work (RTW) of patients after cancer treatment has been a topic of growing interest for the past two decades. Advances in cancer care have led to better patient survival, with some cancers considered as chronic or even cured diseases. The return of patients to their "pre-cancer life" can thus become an objective. Indeed, RTW after cancer is associated with improved quality of life for patients in several studies (improved financial status, improved social contacts, return of functional abilities and improved self-esteem). However, many difficulties can interfere with RTW. Many factors have been identified: disease, treatment, patient and occupational factors. The feeling of "return-to-work self-efficacy" is one of the main psychological determinants and its interest has been recently demonstrated in oncology. It corresponds to a cognitive mechanism based on expectations and/or beliefs of an individual about being able to carry out the actions required to achieve a goal, in this case RTW. The majority of studies on RTW concerns solid cancer and are retrospective. Very few studies have focused on hematological malignancies, whose prognosis was, until recently, worse. Moreover, very few interventional studies exist. There is therefore a significant need for prospective studies with appropriate methodological tools to reliably assess the benefit of interventional measures on RTW. The investigators propose to conduct a prospective, comparative, randomized, multicenter study evaluating the impact of an early RTW-consultation in patients who have been treated for a hematological malignancy. The investigators hypothesize that this consultation will improve patients' RTW rates and RTW quality.
Rationale: In 2020, 115,000 Dutch patients were diagnosed with cancer. Up to 85% of patients treated with radiotherapy involving the head and neck, chemotherapy or stem-celltransplantation (SCT) suffer from taste disorders (dysgeusia). Dysgeusia is one of the most distressing adverse effects of cancer therapy, may be long-lasting and may contribute to malnutrition and decreased QoL. Dysgeusia pathobiology is complex and relates to direct damage to taste buds by anticancer therapies, neuropathy and/or mucosal infection and inflammation. Hyposalivation and concurrent medications may also play a role as well as smoking and poor oral health. Zinc suppletion, clonazepam and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabionol have only limited success. Thus, dysgeusia in cancer patients represents a significant unmet clinical need. Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) using specific wavelengths of red/near infrared light reduces oxidative stress and increases ATP in cells, which improves cell metabolism and reduces inflammation. PBMT is safe and effective for the prevention of oral mucositis and is linked to pain reduction, nerve damage recovery and improved wound healing. There is emerging evidence for PBMT to improve taste, likely based on its regenerative effects on taste buds and nerves involved in taste function. However, there is need for more reliable data on the effect of PBMT on taste. Objective: Assess the efficacy of PBMT to prevent/ameliorate dysgeusia in patients with multiple myeloma treated in Amsterdam UMC with conditioning chemo(radio)therapy followed by autologous stem-cell-transplantation. Study design: Single centre, prospective, longitudinal, double-blinded, randomized, controlled study. Study population: Recipients of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) for the treatment of multiple myeloma in Amsterdam UMC. Intervention: Patients will be blinded to receive either PBMT or sham-PBMT. Main study parameters/endpoints: Objective and subjective taste function and taste associated covariables and their impact on QoL will be assessed. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: The application of PBMT to the (peri)oral region is safe and comes with no relevant side effects. The application of PBMT or sham-PBMT will take about 10-15 minutes per treatment. The measurements at the start of the study and at the visit six weeks after SCT will last about 30 minutes. Scoring the PROMS (2 questionnaires of 1-5 questions) during hospitalization will take about five minutes per day; 2 questionnaires (30+15+ 5 questions), 10 minutes, weekly. Patients do not need to come to the hospital specifically for the study, as they already have an appointment in the hospital.
This is an open-label clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a multicenter, open-label clinical study of a base-reduced-dose pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide combined with dexamethasone (PCd) regimen for the treatment of patients with debilitating relapsed refractory multiple myeloma. Subjects meeting the enrollment criteria were screened for entry into the study and treated with the appropriate regimen; all patients enrolled in the study did not receive medications other than those specified in the regimen for the treatment of myeloma during the study period, except for supportive care. The primary endpoint of the study is ORR; secondary study endpoints include efficacy above VGPR, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), TTNT, safety, and life scale assessment.
In patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM), bone lesions can lead to multiple vertebral lesions, with vertebral collapses. The introduction of minimally invasive procedures such as percutaneous vertebroplasty allow patients to return to a fair level of function and a significant reduction in pain. Despite medical therapies, radiotherapy, analgesics and vertebroplasty procedures, patients with multiple spinal injuries often complain of pain and stiffness that limit their mobility, daily activities and work. The aim of this study is to measure how the biomechanical, thermo-metabolic and algic parameters change after vertebroplasty in patients with MM