View clinical trials related to Multiple Myeloma, Refractory.
Filter by:Immunotherapy has shown promise in the treatment of hematological malignancies, including multiple myeloma. One approach is CAR-NK cell therapy, which involves genetically modifying natural killer (NK) cells to target specific cancer antigens. While CAR-NK therapy offers advantages over CAR-T therapy, such as reduced immune system reactions and lower production time and cost, challenges remain in terms of antitumor efficacy and the tumor microenvironment. Preclinical and early clinical studies have targeted various antigens, including BCMA, with CAR-NK cells in multiple myeloma. To further investigate the potential of BCMA-targeted CAR-NK cell therapy, this study aims to evaluate its safety and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in patients who have not responded to standard therapy.
Selinexor, a first-in-class, oral selective exportin 1 (XPO1) inhibitor, has shown promise in pre-clinical and clinical studies. It functions by inhibiting the nuclear export protein XPO1, resulting in the accumulation of tumor suppressor proteins and inhibition of oncoprotein mRNAs, which is selectively lethal to myeloma cells. Selinexor has demonstrated activity in combination with various drugs, including glucocorticoids and proteasome inhibitors, leading to its FDA approval for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
A phase 2 study of venetoclax in combination with isatuximab and dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients with t(11;14)
This study aims to study the efficacy and safety of oral cyclophosphamide in addition to carfilzomib and dexamethadone for RRMM patients who have been previously exposed to lenalidomide combination therapies.
Pomalidomide either as single therapy or in combination with cyclophosphamide, elotuzumab, bortezomib, or daratumumab are effective treatment regimens in relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Standard dosing is 4 mg/day during 21 days of a 28-day cycle (21/28). However, a clear dose-response association for pomalidomide in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) is lacking. There is data supporting that a dose of 2 mg/day continuously (28/28) induces fewer side effects while efficacy is preserved, compared to 4 mg/day continuously. The response in patients who received pomalidomide 2 mg per day compared to 4 mg per day was higher, with a longer duration of response. In addition, a randomized phase II study showed no difference in efficacy between 4 mg (21/28) and 4 mg continuously. These clinical studies support that a dosage of pomalidomide of 2 mg (28/28) is at least comparable with a dosage of 4 mg (21/28). It is not known if 4 mg every other day (EOD) is comparable to a dosage of pomalidomide 2 mg (28/28) or 4 mg every day (QD, 21/28). For cost reasons, this is interesting as the costs of pomalidomide 4 mg and 2 mg are comparable. Therefore, from a patient and societal perspective, the investigators want to explore if an alternative scheme would be possible by performing a PKPD bio-equivalence pilot study.
Research question: Is KRd therapy effective and safe in the real-world Asian patients? Primay objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of KRd in RRMM patients Secondary objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of investigational treatment strategy by - PFS difference according to the high-risk disease subgroups and previous treatment - OS - Overall response rate and clinical benefit rate - Duration of response To evaluate the safety and tolerability of KRd in RRMM patients
This research is being done to test whether the investigational drug marizomib is safe and effective when used in combination with standard of care drugs for the treatment of multiple myeloma.