Multimodal Analgesia Clinical Trial
Proper pain relief is a major concern of patients worldwide. Preoperatively, one of the most common questions asked by patients pertains to the amount of pain they will experience after surgery how long it will last and how good will it be controlled. Pain concerns the surgical team as well, because of its correlation with clinical outcomes and patients' satisfaction rate . Studies have shown that negative clinical outcome with regard to pain control includes decreases in vital capacity and alveolar ventilation, pneumonia, tachycardia, hypertension, myocardial ischemia, transition into chronic pain, poor wound healing, and psychological sequelae .
Pregablain Interest has been focused on the analgesic, sedative, anxiolytic, and
opioid¬sparing effects of pregabalin (PGL) (S+ 3-isobutyl GABA), a structural analog of GABA
and a derivative of gabapentin in various pain settingsl including postoperative pain . Of a
similar mechanism of action, it is thought to possess a superior phannacokinetic profile
than gabapentin [15]. Pregabalin has a variable role in neuropathic pain conditions, such as
post-herpetic neuralgia, painful diabetic neuropathy, central neuropathic pain, and
fibromyalgia . Some studies had not demonstrated a significant analgesic effect in the
acute, postoperative pain; others propose PGL to have effective sedative and opioid-sparing
effects, both useful characteristics for the control of acute pain. Opioid sparing effects
and improved pain scores have been seen after abdominal and pelvic surgery. Its many
potential actions such as reducing opioid reqUirements, prevention and reduction of opioid
tolerance, improvement of the quality of opioid analgesia, decreased respiratory depression,
relief of anxiety, and gastriC sparing, make it an attractive drug to consider for control
of pain in the post operative period.
Population characteristics The orthopedic oncological patients are a specific group of
individuals whose demand for antinociception starts rather before surgery because of the
bone tumor-generated pain that usually signals the first the existence of pathology. Also,
pain intensity that is generated by an intervention on the skeleton is more intense than
that induced by damage to soft tissue. Subsequently, these patients would require
postoperatively more analgesics than after general surgery and for a longer period of time.
We have demonstrated previously that acute pain that is superimposed on an already aroused
eNS, i.e., the presence of central sensitization, would create a situation where complete
antinociception is hard to obtain, as in these patients, and therefore the efficacy of the
antinociceptive protocol is best tested, comprised the possible transformation of acute into
chronic pain.
Pre-emption has been pointed out as a beneficial tool for reducing perioperative pain.
Various techniques have been employed for this purpose; different drugs were used as well.
The beneficial effects of preemptive PGL were documented in patients who had undergone
lumbar discectomy, both immediately and 1 and 3 months after surgery.
Hypothesis No studies considered the comparison of preemptive vs. post-surgery PGL only
administration, We believe that the administration of PGL preemptively would diminish pain
sensation and therefore the need for opioids administration in orthopedic-oncologic patients
more effectively than if administered starting postoperatively.
Objectives To assess the beneficial effects Of PGL admi"istered either pre-incisionally or
post-incisionally on the immediate and late (1-and 3 months) postoperative analgeSia
requirements and pain scores, as well as satisfaction rate in the orthopedic oncologic
patients.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT02915055 -
NSAID vs. Narcotics
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05106283 -
Comparison of Deep Serratus Anterior Plane Block and Combination of Deep and Superficial Serratus Anterior Plane Block
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06109415 -
A Multi-surgery Assessment of ZYNRELEF (HTX-011), AMAZE.
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT05393414 -
Efficacy of NSAID and Acetaminophen in the Control of Post-Operative Pain in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Replacement
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05700045 -
TAP Using Dexmedetomidine and Ropivacaine for Cesarean Section Analgesia
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05669898 -
Continuous Adductor Canal Infusion vs. Single-injection Adductor Canal Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05121727 -
Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Combination of Deep and Superficial Serratus Anterior Plane Block
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05152602 -
Comparation of Bilateral and Unilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block
|
||
Completed |
NCT05255562 -
Comparison of Combined Serratus Anterior Plane Block and Thoracic Paravertebral Block
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06096181 -
Propofol + Remifentanil vs. Propofol + Dexmedetomidine in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients Having Spine Surgery
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT05427955 -
Efficacy of Bi-level ESPB Application in Patients Undergoing VATS
|
N/A |