View clinical trials related to Mucositis.
Filter by:The aim of the study is to assess which prophylaxis methods is the most suitable for peri-implant hygiene between erythritol and ultrasonic scaler with peek inserts. A randomized clinical trial will be conducted on the patient. Patients will be randomly divided into two groups: - Erythritol group: erythritol with a particle size of ~14 µm will be used for 5 seconds (AIRFLOW® PLUS EMS) - Ultrasonic scaler group: a piezoelectric handpiece with peek inserts (Mini Piezon EMS; PI EMS) will be used. Different subgroups will be defined according to the material of the dental crown of the related implant. The oral hygiene session will be carried out every 6 months (2-years follow-up; 6 sessions), after instruction and motivation of the patient, completion of the clinical chart with the recording of the Probing Depth (evaluation in mm of the peri-implant sulcus taken by a periodontal probe; 4 surfaces of the gingival margin are detected: vestibular, palatal/lingual, mesial, distal), Bleeding on Probing and Plaque Index.
The investigators are evaluating the therapeutic outcomes of two cleaning instruments on treating peri-implant mucositis. Peri-implant mucositis is inflammation around an implant that is limited to only the gum tissue and is characterized by bleeding on probing, pus, and without any evidence of bone loss. The investigators wish to compare the amount of inflammation and bacteria through measurements (like probing depth) and by collecting fluid and plaque samples around participants' implant after using one of the two cleaning instruments.
The study is a Clinical Trial and the main objective is to Evaluate the effects of probiotics on oral complications induced by antineoplastic therapies in patients with head and neck cancer, attended at the radiotherapy service of the Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO) Hospitalet and at the Dental Hospital of the University of Barcelona (HOUB), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Bellvitge campus during the period 2022- 2024. Research question: Is the use of probiotics compared to placebo effective in reducing oral complications produced by antineoplastic therapies in patients with head and neck cancer attended in the radiotherapy service at the Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO) Hospitalet and the Dental Hospital of the University of Barcelona, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences campus Bellvitge during the period 2022- 2024? Study population: Patients attended at the radiotherapy service of the Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO) Hospitalet and at the Dental Hospital of the University of Barcelona (HOUB), (Master of Dentistry in Oncology and Immunocompromised Patients) diagnosed by histological confirmation of head and neck cancer and treated in the last year.Intervention: Patients who agree to participate in the study will be randomized to the intervention or control group. Two visits will be made, the first as a baseline measurement and the second after the end of the intervention. In the first visit they will be given the products either probiotic or placebo, with presentation of a box with 10 sachets. The probiotics contain: Lactobacillus Rhamnosus GG, Lactobacillus casei, Streptococcus thermophilus, Bifidobacterium breve, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium infantis and Lactobacillus bulgaricus. 1 x 10e10 Colony Forming Units (CFU). And the placebo composed of excipients. They are gluten free. Each patient will be given 1 sachet dissolved in water, to take 2-3 minutes of mouthfuls then swallow, after brushing, once a day, for 30 days.
This controlled clinical trial will assess clinically, immunologically, and microbiologically the healing of experimental peri-implant mucositis (PIM) lesions in implants treated previously with implantoplasty (IP) compared to those treated without IP.
The use of titanium dental implants has become a common modern treatment to restore teeth. Although the success rate of dental implants is high, inflammation around the dental implant still occurs. The current study will investigate if the inflammation around the implant is due to bacterial infection, hypersensitivity or both. The goal of this cross-sectional study is to (1) Establish the levels of cytokines in peri-implant crevicular fluid associated with bacterial infection and hypersensitivity reaction; (2) Compare the levels of cytokines associated with hypersensitivity and bacterial infection between healthy implants and inflamed implants (peri-mucositis and peri-implantitis); (3) Determine whether the difference in the levels of cytokines, if they exist, reflects the clinical diagnosis of healthy implants and inflamed implants.
This study aims to: - Evaluate the possible protective effect of pentoxifylline against oxaliplatin induced peripheral neuropathy and chemotherapy induced mucositis in patients with stage II and stage III colorectal cancer. This study will be a randomized placebo controlled parallel study.48 patients with colorectal cancer will be randomized to 2 groups: Group I (control group; n=24) which will receive 12 cycles of FOLFOX-6 regimen plus placebo tablets twice daily. Group II (Pentoxiphylline group; n=24) which will receive FOLFOX-6 regimen in addition to pentoxifylline 400 mg twice daily. Blood sample collection and biochemical assessment: - Malondialdehyde (MDA) as oxidative stress marker (colorimetry). - Tumor necrosis factor alfa (TNF-α) as pro inflammatory marker (ELISA). - Neurotensin (NT) as a potential marker for neuropathic pain (ELISA). - Citrulline as a biomarker for mucositis (ELISA). Clinical assessment of oxaliplatin induced neuropathy will be done through: The assessment of the severity of neuropathic pain through "Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form" at baseline and by the end of every two chemotherapy cycles. The implication of National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE, Version 5, 2017) for grading of neuropathy every 2 cycles. The use of Neurotoxicity- 12 item questionnaire score (Ntx-12) from the validated Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group at baseline and by the end of every two chemotherapy cycles). Mucositis will be assessed at baseline and by the end of every two chemotherapy cycles through the use of common terminology criteria for adverse events "CTCAE, version 5.00, 2017
The purpose of oral care is to reduce the effect of oral pathological microbial flora and to prevent infection, pain, and bleeding associated with cancer treatment. New agents are introduced each day to be used in the prevention and treatment of mucositis in cancer treatment. One of those agents is the Ankaferd Hemostat. Ankaferd Hemostat has pleiotropic effects and anti-infective characteristics in tissue healing. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Ankaferd Hemostat in the prevention of oral mucositis due to chemotherapy in adult patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer. The study was designed as a randomized controlled experimental study to be conducted with patients who are recently diagnosed with colorectal cancer and will receive the first course of chemotherapyd. The data were collected using the Performance Score and the Oral Mucositis Evaluation Scale.
1. Study Design - Prospective, Randomized, Questionnaire-Based Study - Study Type: Phase 1/Phase 2 Interventional Clinical Trial - Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment - Masking: None (Open-label) - Actual Enrollment: 100 participants - Allocation: Randomized - Primary Purpose: Supportive Care/Treatment - Study groups - Control Group (Group 1): Saline mouthwash (±Bocaliner™) - Intervention Group (Group 2): Benzydamine mouthwash (±Bocaliner™) 2. Settings - Single-center (a specialized hematology center) - Location: Hematology Center after Prof. R. Yeolyan, 7 Nersisyan St, Yerevan 0014, Armenia - Subjects will initially be enrolled, consented, examined, and complete initial questionnaires in the healthcare provider's office Subjects will undergo initial evaluation and follow-up examinations to determine WHO Oral Mucositis Scores - Subjects will complete questionnaires at the medical center with the Research Coordinator 7 and 14 days after study enrollment. Subjects using Bocaliner™ will additionally complete a follow-up questionnaire. - Application of Bocaliner™ will be carried out first at the hospital followed by self-administration at home.
Statement of problem Oral mucositis is an inflammatory condition that affects mucosa of the oral cavity. The etiology of this kind of aggravation is related to the introduction of radiotherapy or chemotherapeutic medications. (Alvarino et al., 2014, Rohani et al., 2015) With the prevalence of mucositis up to 80% in pediatric patient (Cheng et al., 2004). Clinically, oral mucositis is a painful situation that significantly affects patients' quality of life. The severe cases are associated with ulcerated mucosa and secondary infection which may led to life-threatening sepsis. (Kolokythas , et al., 2010) Oral mucositis is one of the most debilitating complications following chemotherapy, its remains an unresolved clinical problem, and it has physical and psychosocial implications for patients. The ulcerative lesions are often very painful, requiring treatment with analgesics and supportive nutrition, and the cancer treatment may need to be interrupted or modified. All these conditions may increase treatment costs, preclude further treatment and alter the quality of life of the patient. (Sonis et al., 2001) There are many oral care regimens including prophylactic antibacterial and antifungal drugs, Levofloxacin is antibacterial drug causing inhibition of cell wall synthesis agent, Levofloxacin failed to show any significant difference in mucositis or oral ulceration (Bucaneve et al., 2005). While voriconazole is antifungal that has been noted to cause transient visual disturbances and A major drawback is potential interactions with certain chemotherapy agents (Marks et al., 2011). Vitamin E is an antioxidant agent which may limit tissue damage from free oxygen radicals and, thus, may reduce the severity of mucositis during cancer treatments and protect cell membranes from radiation damage (Alterio et al., 2007). It has a very low toxicity and is generally well-tolerated (Geeraert et al., 2015). Rationale There is no enough studies about vitamin E effect in reduction of oral mucositis. El -Housseiny et al., (2007), recommend that oral mucositis is successfully treated by the topical application of vitamin "E", compared to its systemic administration. Vitamin "E" alone is not enough for the treatment of infected lesions; further studies using vitamin "E" to treat the infected lesions are needed. Also based on the recommendation of Wadleigh et al., (1992) who was the first one to study the topical effect of vitamin "E" on oral mucositis; however, they did not know whether the effect was due to the topical application or the systemic absorption of the vitamin when applied topically. Benefit to patient and population: The vitamin E is nontoxic, odorless, tasteless, and well tolerated by the patients, reduce nutritional compromise, maintain impact on quality of life, and reasonable economic costs. Benefits of practitioners and clinicians: The use of vitamin E is easy to apply, not technique sensitive and it is cheap and readily available reducing clinical time.
Oral mucositis is one of the most common debilitating forms of mucositis that arise from high dose chemotherapy and radiotherapy. It is reported that almost 75% patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) develop oral mucositis at different levels of severity. The objective of this prospective study was to assess the efficacy of the addition of supersaturated calcium phosphate oral spray and the addition of an extra soft tooth brush to the basic OH in addition to the currently existing oral hygiene protocol regimen (0.2% Chlorhexidine Gluconate + 3% Sodium Bicarbonate+ Nystatin 100000 U/ml) in reducing the severity of oral mucositis among patients receiving chemotherapy for HCT. 60 patients receiving chemotherapy for HCT were randomly allocated to four groups of 15 patients each The oral mucositis was recorded according to WHO criteria and the progression of the oral mucositis was monitored from the day of admission (day - 1) to the day of discharge (day 28). The absolute neutrophil count, platelet counts and salivary flow rate of all patients was recorded.