View clinical trials related to Mouth, Edentulous.
Filter by:Today, tooth- or implant-supported single crowns and short-span fixed partial dentures can be fabricated on the basis of an intraoral scan, but the scanning accuracy decreases with increasing length of the jaw section to be captured. An accurate scan is also made more difficult by edentulous jaw sections, as these provide the scanner with few landmarks for proper three-dimensional image composition. With respect to both edentulous and edentulous patients with dental implants, the currently available literature does not provide a firm basis for deciding whether such patients can already be scanned with sufficient accuracy. It is considered problematic in this context that the findings on digital impression accuracy, regardless of whether teeth or implants have been scanned, are based almost exclusively on the results of in vitro studies. Conclusions about the accuracy of intraoral scanners under clinical conditions with moving patients and limited accessibility to the structures to be imaged, especially in the presence of blood, saliva or sulcus fluid, are extremely limited based on these data. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the clinical scanning accuracy of two current intraoral scanning systems for the three-dimensional acquisition of the position of two interforaminal dental implants in the edentulous mandible. The influence of artificial landmarks to achieve increased scan accuracy will also be tested.
As part of post-marketing clinical follow-up, BIOTECH DENTAL sets up the collection and evaluation of clinical data proactively with the aim of confirming the safety, performance as well as the constantly acceptable nature of the risks identified and of detecting potential emerging risks with the use of "Kontact Perio Level" implants in everyday practice.
Since the teeth loss leads to disability & impairment, and teeth restoration lead to improvement in the life quality throughout the oral health improvement. The acceptable function of a complete denture on great extent depends on impression technique which includes the maximum coverage of denture supporting areas and making a combination of managing movable soft tissues along with different kinds of impression materials and techniques for accurate reproduction of oral foundation. Border molding considered to be as an important step in the in complete denture fabrication, since the retention of complete dentures depend on several factors, as the biological, physical and mechanical, these factors could be achieved by mean of an accurate border molding followed by an accurate final impression. The border molding technique is the shaping of the border areas of a custom impression tray by manual or functional manipulation of the tissue adjacent to the borders in order to duplicate the size and contour of the vestibule resulting in maintains of the peripheral seal during function. This property causes the border molding process to require twenty-four insertions, namely eight in the maxilla and sixteen in the mandible causing long working time and discomfort in patients. Hence, the material used for this technique should provide optimum working time, have adequate body, and permit the correction of border moulding by additions. However additions if made to a single step border moulded material would again introduce all the disadvantages that are associated with sectional moulding Single-step border molding is considerably more straightforward than sectional border molding owing to the reduced number of tray insertions. This technique is usually used with elastomeric impression materials, which may not provide sufficient time to mold and record the peripheral tissues of the denture bearing area. The present technique uses light polymerizing tray material for molding tray borders, offering extended working time. This is advantageous for operators with less experience, such as dental school students. Furthermore, correction of border molding is possible with the addition of new material. The technique uses materials that are readily available,and no special armamentarium is required.
This study aims to test the combined effects of different loading protocols and surgical approaches on clinical and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following the use of four mini implants for mandibular overdenture retention. The main study hypotheses are: 1. There are significant improvements in PROMs following implant intervention compared to baseline measures; 2. Immediately loaded mini implants have similar failure rates compared to mini implants receiving a delayed 6-week protocol. 3. Flapless surgery has similar post-insertion outcomes compared to flapped surgery.
Objectives to evaluate the oral health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction in completely edentulous patients, when restored by maxillary and mandibular fixed (screw-retained) or removable telescopic retained implant supported prosthesis. 19 patients were randomized to receive either a fixed or a removable maxillary and mandibular full arch implant prosthesis. They were then asked to answer the OHIP-14 and a patient satisfaction questionnaire at 2 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months post-prosthetic insertion.
A randomized clinical trial (RCT) was designed. Fourteen completely edentulous participants were randomly allocated into two equal groups. All participants received two implants in the inter-foraminal area with ball attachments. Participants in the control group were rehabilitated with conventionally manufactured Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) maxillary complete denture and mandibular implant overdentures while participants in intervention group received digital light processed (DLP)-printed photo-polymerizable PMMA Nextdent maxillary complete denture and mandibular implant overdentures. Follow-up appointments were scheduled at 3,6, and 12 months where data of Oral Health Impact Profile 19(OHIPEDENT19) was used to assess the OHRQoL (oral health related quality of life). In addition, denture retention was measured using digital force gauge device. Data were collected and statistically analyzed.
Dental implant supported screwed prosthetic rehabilitations are associated to several advantages, as a minimal occlusal spaced and easier hygiene and maintenance. In this sense, screwed rehabilitations have been associated with lower frequency of biological and technical complications. Nevertheless, the screwing process results in the formation of a prosthetic chimney that requieres an appropriate sealing protocol. This protocol needs to include a material for the protection of the screw head. Nowadays, there is a lack of materials for this intended use with marketing authorisation. Several materials have been tested in the bibliography including PTFE, although there are not high quality studies. In this context, this clinical investigation aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety os a PTFE-based product (MAFILL) for the sealing of prosthetic chimneys and the protection of the screw head.
comparing immediate functionally loaded implants and immediate non functionally loaded implants in the posterior mandibular region on bases of bone density and bone loss evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
A successful implant surgery primarily relies on a prudent evaluation of oral anatomy and meticulous treatment planning. Additionally, of paramount importance that dictates the types of procedures, material selection and ultimately success of implant surgery is the quality and quantity of the edentulous ridge. Ultrasound imaging (US), another cross-sectional imaging modality, has been extensively used in the medical diagnostics field. The ability of ultrasound to image soft tissue-bone interface makes it particularly promising for studying bone ridge width and crestal bone topography. Therefore, this retrospective human study aimed to compare bone width measurements between US and CBCT. This study also investigated the possible correlation between the crestal bone surface quality imaged by US and CBCT.
Fifty six patients were randomly enrolled in the study. Participants were randomly stratified into two control groups and two test groups, from which conventional pick up and digital impressions were made respectively. Patients of group 1 (CIG Axial) and 3 (DIG Axial) received 4 axial implants whereas, group 2 patients (CIG Tilted), and group 4 (DIG Tilted) received two anterior axial implants and two distal tilted implants. All participants received hybrid dentures. Bone loss, implant loss, maintenance of prosthesis were evaluated at 6m,12m, and 24 months follow up period.