View clinical trials related to Mouth, Edentulous.
Filter by:the aim of the study to compare the anterior maxillary bone index changes for patient rehabilitated with implant supported fixed prosthesis opposed by natural teeth
A total of 34 participants, who require replacement of an anterior or posterior single tooth with dental implant, will be randomly allocated to two equal sized groups. In the control group, the osteotomy site preparation will be prepared by using conventional surgical drills, while the test group site preparation will involve the use of Densah™ Burs (Versah Co., LLC., USA) as per the osseodensification protocol. In addition to evaluating implant stability, the trial will also report on implant and patient outcomes at various time points.
The aim of the current study is to assess the effect of two types of attachments (Locator, Novaloc) on the supporting structures both mechanically using stress strain analysis and biologically through measuring bone height using cbct.
This study is designed as a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trail, Evaluate the effect of osseodensification technique on primary stability in comparison to the conventional drilling technique in immediate single fresh extraction sockets.
This retrospective study investigates the longevity of dentures with SR Phonares II teeth after a wearing period of more than 10 years. The primary objective is to assess the survival rate of dentures with SR Phonares II teeth after more than 10 years. The secondary objectives asses the quality of the dentures concerning aesthetic, functional and biological properties.
Anthogyr Axiom Tissue-Level implants and corresponding Multi-Unit abutments recently enriched the available product range for dental surgeons. This Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up study aims at confirming the safety and performance of these products. The comparison with similar Anthogyr Axiom Bone-level implants will provide additional information on the effect of platform-switching in bone level maintenance for single and two-piece design at the implant level.
The bone grafting materials currently used in dentistry are autografts, allografts, xenografts, and alloplastic grafts. Among these different types of bone graft materials, autografts are considered to have the most predictable results due to their properties of osteogenesis, osteoinduction, and osteoconduction. However, bone autografts are rarely used due to the high morbidity associated with harvesting the bone graft from the patient with a second surgical site. Because of the increased risk to the patient with autogenous bone grafts, the current standard of care is an allograft, which is a bone graft harvested from cadaver sources such as Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft (FDBA). While allografts can only possess the qualities of osteoinduction and osteoconduction, they also have dramatically less morbidity due to the lack of a second surgical site. Our null hypothesis states that: Experimental groups (mineralized, and partially demineralized dentin grafts) do not show positive changes in implant stability, survival, failure rate, probing pocket depth, and interproximal crestal bone level changes when compared to FDBA Our alternative hypothesis states that: Experimental groups (mineralized, and partially demineralized dentin grafts) show similar or better results in terms of implant stability, survival, failure rate, probing pocket depth, and interproximal crestal bone level changes when compared to FDBA.
Today, tooth- or implant-supported single crowns and short-span fixed partial dentures can be fabricated on the basis of an intraoral scan, but the scanning accuracy decreases with increasing length of the jaw section to be captured. An accurate scan is also made more difficult by edentulous jaw sections, as these provide the scanner with few landmarks for proper three-dimensional image composition. With respect to both edentulous and edentulous patients with dental implants, the currently available literature does not provide a firm basis for deciding whether such patients can already be scanned with sufficient accuracy. It is considered problematic in this context that the findings on digital impression accuracy, regardless of whether teeth or implants have been scanned, are based almost exclusively on the results of in vitro studies. Conclusions about the accuracy of intraoral scanners under clinical conditions with moving patients and limited accessibility to the structures to be imaged, especially in the presence of blood, saliva or sulcus fluid, are extremely limited based on these data. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the clinical scanning accuracy of two current intraoral scanning systems for the three-dimensional acquisition of the position of two interforaminal dental implants in the edentulous mandible. The influence of artificial landmarks to achieve increased scan accuracy will also be tested.
the purpose of this study is to clarify the rationale for the choice of the upper or lower jaw for positioning the occlusal splint
Partial or total edentulousness has a significant impact on quality of life both functionally and aesthetically. TBR® Tissue Level Z1 Implants allow the patient to prevent bone resorption and maintain facial tissue and musculature support. At the functional level, the patient who benefits from implant treatment regains normal masticatory function with all the benefits on the quality of life that this can bring him. Due to the osseointegration of the implant and the biocompatibility of the materials used, the implant treatment remains effective in the long term and makes it possible to maintain the aesthetics of the smile.