View clinical trials related to Mouth, Edentulous.
Filter by:Clinical evaluation of stability of dental implant placed simultaneously with closed sinus lifting using hydraulic lift technique versus summer's osteotome technique in posterior edentulous maxilla (RCT)
Radiographic evaluation of bone height gain with dental implant placed simultaneously with closed sinus lifting using hydraulic lift technique versus summers' osteotome technique in posterior edentulous maxilla (RCT)
A randomized clinical trial (RCT) was designed. Fourteen completely edentulous participants were randomly allocated into two equal groups. All participants received two implants in the inter-foraminal area with ball attachments. Participants in the control group were rehabilitated with conventionally manufactured Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) maxillary complete denture and mandibular implant overdentures while participants in intervention group received digital light processed (DLP)-printed photo-polymerizable PMMA Nextdent maxillary complete denture and mandibular implant overdentures. Follow-up appointments were scheduled at 3,6, and 12 months where data of Oral Health Impact Profile 19(OHIPEDENT19) was used to assess the OHRQoL (oral health related quality of life). In addition, denture retention was measured using digital force gauge device. Data were collected and statistically analyzed.
The Neodent® Zirconia Implant is designed for the treatment of oral endosteal implantation for the functional and aesthetic rehabilitation, allowing for treatment of patients with different bone qualities. The objective of the study is to assess the success and survival rates of implantable devices of the Zirconia System, in order to confirm the long-term safety and clinical performance of implants and abutments of the Zirconia System in daily dental practice setting. Devices will be used according to standard routine in daily practice, according to manufacturer indications in the IFU. Patients will be followed for 36 months after implant placement.
Dental implant supported screwed prosthetic rehabilitations are associated to several advantages, as a minimal occlusal spaced and easier hygiene and maintenance. In this sense, screwed rehabilitations have been associated with lower frequency of biological and technical complications. Nevertheless, the screwing process results in the formation of a prosthetic chimney that requieres an appropriate sealing protocol. This protocol needs to include a material for the protection of the screw head. Nowadays, there is a lack of materials for this intended use with marketing authorisation. Several materials have been tested in the bibliography including PTFE, although there are not high quality studies. In this context, this clinical investigation aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety os a PTFE-based product (MAFILL) for the sealing of prosthetic chimneys and the protection of the screw head.
The study will compare between osteotome technique and New Reverse Drilling Technique in the placement of dental implant in posterior maxilla , primary outcome will be Implant stability that will be measured by Periotest device . follow up for 6 month. secondary outcomes will be crestal bone loss , pain and swelling.
comparing immediate functionally loaded implants and immediate non functionally loaded implants in the posterior mandibular region on bases of bone density and bone loss evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
A successful implant surgery primarily relies on a prudent evaluation of oral anatomy and meticulous treatment planning. Additionally, of paramount importance that dictates the types of procedures, material selection and ultimately success of implant surgery is the quality and quantity of the edentulous ridge. Ultrasound imaging (US), another cross-sectional imaging modality, has been extensively used in the medical diagnostics field. The ability of ultrasound to image soft tissue-bone interface makes it particularly promising for studying bone ridge width and crestal bone topography. Therefore, this retrospective human study aimed to compare bone width measurements between US and CBCT. This study also investigated the possible correlation between the crestal bone surface quality imaged by US and CBCT.
Fifty six patients were randomly enrolled in the study. Participants were randomly stratified into two control groups and two test groups, from which conventional pick up and digital impressions were made respectively. Patients of group 1 (CIG Axial) and 3 (DIG Axial) received 4 axial implants whereas, group 2 patients (CIG Tilted), and group 4 (DIG Tilted) received two anterior axial implants and two distal tilted implants. All participants received hybrid dentures. Bone loss, implant loss, maintenance of prosthesis were evaluated at 6m,12m, and 24 months follow up period.
- Patients were randomly divided in to two groups by using computerized software ; the first group received flat magnetic attachment design while the second group received dome magnetic attachment design.which the inclusion criteria is completely edentulous patient ,Age range from 40 to 70 year old ,skeletal class 1, both sexes - Implant stability will be measured for both groups using smart peg /osstell at the day of implant installation and after 2,4,8,12 weeks. - Patient satisfaction measure in 2 weak and after 12 weak by Denture satisfaction questionnaire