Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05878457
Other study ID # Pro00126436
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase Phase 1
First received
Last updated
Start date December 1, 2023
Est. completion date May 30, 2024

Study information

Verified date March 2024
Source Medical University of South Carolina
Contact Lisa McTeague, PhD
Phone 843-792-8274
Email mcteague@musc.edu
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This pilot study will investigate the safety, feasibility, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of accelerated high-dose repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) targeting the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) to address apathy symptoms in individuals with chronic stroke.


Description:

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a well-established FDA-approved treatment for several psychiatric indications including treatment-resistant depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and smoking cessation. Traditional rTMS targets the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) with repetitive treatments delivered for six weeks. Recent innovations have led to the development of accelerated, high-dose rTMS protocols, with recent FDA-approval, that are capable of delivering a full treatment course within a single week. Accumulating evidence suggests that similar neuromodulation protocols may be helpful in targeting neuropsychiatric symptoms across a range of neurologic and neurodegenerative conditions including dementia, movement disorders, and stroke. Apathy is a distinct neuropsychiatric symptom characterized by loss of motivation, withdrawal, and decreased goal-directed activity seen across a wide range of neuropsychiatric conditions. Apathy contributes significantly to lower quality of life, caregiver burnout, and poorer rehabilitation outcomes. Meanwhile, there are currently no FDA-approved treatments targeting apathy specifically. The mPFC has been well-established as a safe and feasible target for traditional rTMS, and may be a desirable stimulation site in targeting apathy due to its superficial location and integral association with other brain structures implicated in apathy pathophysiology such as the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and ventral striatum (VL). This phase I open-label pilot study will investigate high-dose, accelerated rTMS at the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) to target apathy in individuals with chronic stroke. The primary aims of the study will be to: (1) establish the safety, feasibility, tolerability, and acceptability of an accelerated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocol for apathy in chronic stroke; (2) establish the feasibility of individualized resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) connectivity for targeting rTMS in post-stroke apathy; (3) establish preliminary efficacy of an accelerated rTMS protocol for post-stroke apathy. Given the limited power of this small pilot study, this aim will be considered exploratory with the intention to guide future research. Sixteen chronic stroke patients with symptomatic apathy will complete (1) structural as well as resting state functional MRI at baseline for targeting parcellations. (2) A battery of validated clinical assessments of apathy-related symptoms (3) a battery of neuropsychological, cognitive, and symptom measures to assess safety, tolerability, and feasibility. Treatment will consist of open-label, high-dose rTMS to left mPFC delivered following a standard protocol consisting of 600 pulses, twelve times per day, for three treatment days (contiguous or non-contiguous) within a seven-day period. Safety assessments will be monitored throughout treatment. A battery of clinical assessments will be repeated at the end of treatment and weekly for one month post-treatment.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 16
Est. completion date May 30, 2024
Est. primary completion date May 30, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 40 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. 40 years old or greater 2. Right- or left-hemisphere ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke with at least 6 months chronicity 3. Symptomatic apathy as confirmed by (A) total score on the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) of =39 as rated by the participant or caregiver informant 4. Intact cortex under the coil at the stimulation target site confirmed by neuroimaging 5. Ability to participate in psychometric testing and cognitive tasks Exclusion Criteria: 1. Primary extra-axial hemorrhage (subdural or subarachnoid) without ischemic stroke or intraparenchymal hemorrhage 2. Concomitant neurological disorders affecting motor or cognitive function (e.g. dementia) 3. Moderate or severe global aphasia 4. Visual impairment precluding completion of cognitive tasks 5. Presence of contraindications to MRI or TMS including electrically, magnetically or mechanically activated metal or nonmetal implants such as cardiac pacemakers, intracerebral vascular clips, or any other electrically sensitive support system; 6. Pregnancy (to be later confirmed by UPT in any premenopausal female participants) 7. History of a seizure disorder 8. Preexisting scalp lesion, wound, bone defect, or hemicraniectomy 9. Claustrophobia precluding the ability to undergo an MRI 10. Active substance use disorder 11. Psychotic disorders 12. Bipolar 1 Disorder 13. Acute suicidality as assessed by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) or suicide attempt in the previous year

Study Design


Intervention

Device:
MagVenture MagPro Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) System
Treatment will consist 12 approximately-three-minute sessions on each of three treatment days within a seven-day period. To promote participant adherence and retention, treatment days will not need to be contiguous. A single session consists of 600 pulses delivered to the dmPFC at an intensity of 120% resting motor threshold (rMT). 50 hz triphasic bursts will be delivered for two seconds, followed by an 8 second inter-train interval. Trains will be repeated every 10 seconds, 10 times total, for a total of 190 seconds per session. An intersession interval of at least 15 minutes will be employed between each of the 12 sessions. Each treatment day will thus last approximately 3-4 hours in duration.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Medical University of South Carolina Brain Stimulation Lab Charleston South Carolina

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Medical University of South Carolina

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (11)

Casaletto KB, Umlauf A, Beaumont J, Gershon R, Slotkin J, Akshoomoff N, Heaton RK. Demographically Corrected Normative Standards for the English Version of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2015 May;21(5):378-91. doi: 10.1017/S135 — View Citation

Holtzheimer PE 3rd, McDonald WM, Mufti M, Kelley ME, Quinn S, Corso G, Epstein CM. Accelerated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression. Depress Anxiety. 2010 Oct;27(10):960-3. doi: 10.1002/da.20731. — View Citation

Jorge RE, Starkstein SE, Robinson RG. Apathy following stroke. Can J Psychiatry. 2010 Jun;55(6):350-4. doi: 10.1177/070674371005500603. — View Citation

Le Heron C, Apps MAJ, Husain M. The anatomy of apathy: A neurocognitive framework for amotivated behaviour. Neuropsychologia. 2018 Sep;118(Pt B):54-67. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 8. — View Citation

Levy R, Dubois B. Apathy and the functional anatomy of the prefrontal cortex-basal ganglia circuits. Cereb Cortex. 2006 Jul;16(7):916-28. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhj043. Epub 2005 Oct 5. — View Citation

Marin RS, Biedrzycki RC, Firinciogullari S. Reliability and validity of the Apathy Evaluation Scale. Psychiatry Res. 1991 Aug;38(2):143-62. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(91)90040-v. — View Citation

Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.15 — View Citation

Santa N, Sugimori H, Kusuda K, Yamashita Y, Ibayashi S, Iida M. Apathy and functional recovery following first-ever stroke. Int J Rehabil Res. 2008 Dec;31(4):321-6. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e3282fc0f0e. — View Citation

Sasaki N, Hara T, Yamada N, Niimi M, Kakuda W, Abo M. The Efficacy of High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Improving Apathy in Chronic Stroke Patients. Eur Neurol. 2017;78(1-2):28-32. doi: 10.1159/000477440. Epub 2017 Jun 3. — View Citation

Schalet BD, Pilkonis PA, Yu L, Dodds N, Johnston KL, Yount S, Riley W, Cella D. Clinical validity of PROMIS Depression, Anxiety, and Anger across diverse clinical samples. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 May;73:119-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.036. Epub 201 — View Citation

Sockeel P, Dujardin K, Devos D, Deneve C, Destee A, Defebvre L. The Lille apathy rating scale (LARS), a new instrument for detecting and quantifying apathy: validation in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006 May;77(5):579-84. doi: 10.1 — View Citation

* Note: There are 11 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change in apathy symptoms, as measured by the Lille Apathy Rating Scale (LARS) compared to baseline The Lille Apathy Rating Scale (LARS) is a clinically validated 33-item structured interview assessing clinical symptoms of apathy. The structured interview is broken into 9 sub-scales including everyday productivity, interests, taking the initiative, novelty seeking, motivation, emotional responsiveness, concern, and social life. Total scores can range from -36 to +36 and are further stratified by factorial sub-scores including intellectual curiosity, emotion, action initiation, and self-awareness. Pre-treatment, immediately post-treatment, and weekly for four weeks post-treatment
Primary Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as assessed by change in the Review of Systems Criteria compared to baseline A review of systems questionnaire will be administered to rate the subjective symptom (headache, scalp pain, arm/hand pain, other pain(s), numbness/tingling, other sensation(s), weakness, loss of dexterity, vision/hearing change(s), ear ringing, nausea/vomiting, appetite loss, rash, skin change(s) or any other symptom(s)) on a scale of 0 to 5 (none, minimal, mild, moderate, marked, severe). After each session of rTMS during each of three treatment days within one week
Primary Change in global cognition, as measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) compared to baseline The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a clinical assessment of cognitive function. The MoCA assesses multiple cognitive domains including memory, visuospatial skills, executive function, attention, concentration, calculation, language, abstraction, and orientation. The MoCA can be administered in approximately 10 minutes and total scores range from 0 to 30 with lower scores correlating with greater degree of cognitive impairment. Pre-treatment, immediately post-treatment, and at one month post-treatment follow-up
Primary Change From Baseline Cognition, as Measured by the Fluid Cognition Composite Score From the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery compared to baseline Fluid cognition was measured using the iPad-administered NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB). Fluid Cognition Composite scores were calculated by averaging the demographically adjusted (age, education, sex, race/ethnicity; Casaletto et al., 2015) T-scores for 4 NIHTB-CB tests: the flanker inhibitory control, list sorting working memory, pattern comparison processing speed, and dimensional change card sort tests. T-Scores have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Lower scores indicate worse performance. Pre-treatment, immediately post-treatment
Primary Participant retention rate Percentage of participants who completed the study relative to all participants who initiated treatment (target n=16).
Percentage of participants who completed the study relative to all participants who initiated treatment (target n=16).
Percentage of participants who completed the study relative to all participants who initiated treatment (target n=16).
calculated at the end of the study follow-up assessment period (one month post-treatment)
Primary Patient perception of treatment acceptability as assessed by study-specific questionnaire A 15-item study-specific questionnaire of rTMS treatment acceptability, with each item rated on a scale from 1 to 5 (1 = not at all, 3 = somewhat, 5 = very much so). Higher scores indicate better acceptability for the first 10 items, lower scores indicate better acceptability for the last 5 items. After each session of rTMS during each of three treatment days within one week, and at one month post-treatment follow-up
Secondary Change in apathy symptoms, as measured by the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) compared to baseline The Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) clinically validated rating scale assessing symptoms of apathy. The AES is comprised of 18 items rated on a four-point Likert-Scale assessing and quantifying emotional, behavioural and cognitive aspects of apathy. Total scores on the AES range from 18 to 72 with high scores correlating with greater severity of apathy. Pre-treatment, immediately post-treatment, and at one month post-treatment follow-up
Secondary Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression Short Form Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression Short Form The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is a clinically validated adaptive clinical assessment tool designed under the NIH to capture patient-reported symptoms in several psychiatric symptom domains for use in clinical research. Pre-treatment, immediately post-treatment, and weekly for four weeks post-treatment
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04612842 - Engaging Older Adults in Fall Prevention Using Motivational Interviewing (MI) N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06071130 - Emotion, Aging, and Decision Making N/A
Recruiting NCT06029959 - Stroke and CPAP Outcome Study 3 N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT05547230 - a Research About the Effect of Body Awareness on Work Motivation and Quality of Life, Among Primary School Teachers
Not yet recruiting NCT04978194 - Effects of an Intervention on University Students' Mental Health and Learning During COVID-19 N/A
Completed NCT04505241 - Evaluating Mechanisms of Action of Adaptive Goal-Setting for Physical Activity N/A
Completed NCT02924025 - Motivational Interviewing as an Intervention for PCOS N/A
Completed NCT01433679 - The Effect of a Web-Based Behavioral Intervention on Physical Activity Levels in Adolescents N/A
Completed NCT00705887 - A Motivational Enhancement Approach to Skin Cancer Prevention N/A
Completed NCT05100524 - Motivational Interview for Daily Living Activities in Elderly People Undergoing Total Knee Replacement N/A
Completed NCT05562245 - Motivational Interviewing-Based Breastfeeding Education N/A
Completed NCT04024371 - Validating Reward-related Biomarkers (RTOC)
Enrolling by invitation NCT03328962 - Smoking Cessation in Cancer Treatment N/A
Recruiting NCT05803213 - Learning Efficacy and Motivation of Medical Students in Clinical Training With Virtual Reality N/A
Completed NCT06044090 - Brain and Stress Study Phase 4
Completed NCT04927923 - The Effect of Hope-focused Motivational Interview on Individuals Receiving Hemodialysis Treatment N/A
Completed NCT05499338 - Motivation as a Strategy for Adherence to a Stretching Program for Basketball Players N/A
Completed NCT03681509 - Pramipexole and Emotional Processing N/A
Recruiting NCT05065151 - Understanding Motivation in Parkinson's Patients Through Neurophysiology N/A
Recruiting NCT06257446 - InformationSeekingMesolimbicEngagementStudy1 N/A