View clinical trials related to Misoprostol.
Filter by:The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and the safety of vaginal misoprostol with oral misoprostol for induction of labor in nulliparous pregnant women at or beyond completed 41 weeks.
Background: Unintended pregnancies continue to cause a public health threat in Low and Middle Income countries yet with restrictive abortion laws. Over 40% of these unintended pregnancies end up as unsafe abortions leading to significant maternal morbidity and mortality. With ovulation occurring between 5-10 days after first trimester abortion, 47% of the women conceive shortly afterwards yet nearly 50% of the women never return for follow up. This study seeks to investigate effectiveness of early insertion of Intrauterine contraception (IUC) (within one week after medical Post abortion care (mPAC)) compared to Standard IUC insertion (between 2-4 weeks post PAC), in Uganda with the ultimate aim of increasing the uptake of IUC post 1st trimester medical management of incomplete abortion. Hypothesis: Null hypothesis: Early Insertion of IUC has higher expulsion rates and continued use than standard insertion after medical management among women with first trimester incomplete abortion at six months within a non-inferiority margin of 7.5%. Alternate hypothesis: Early Insertion of IUC has similar expulsion rates and continued use as standard insertion after medical management among women with first trimester incomplete abortion at six months within a non-inferiority margin of 7.5%. Methods: A Non-inferiority RCT of 2,076 participants will be conducted in 15 health facilities within Central Uganda. Baseline participant characteristics will be analyzed using descriptive statistics. For continuous variables, statistical tests such as Fisher's exact test, t-test, ANOVA and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test will be used as appropriate. Binary logistic regression model will be used for factors associated with the dependent variable uptake of intrauterine contraception with p-value set <0.05 as level of significance. Intention to treat and per protocol analysis will be used for the RCTs. Study utility: A greater proportion of women undergoing medical post abortion care for incomplete abortion will receive their intended post abortion IUC within the first days after the PAC treatment compared with routine insertion at a scheduled follow up visit 2-4 weeks later. Though there could be higher expulsion rates in the early versus the standard IUC insertion, continued use at 6 months following abortion will be higher in the early insertion group as compared to the standard insertion group thereby reducing unplanned and unwanted pregnancy.
The objective of the randomized controlled study is to compare combination of sublingual misoprostol and routine uterotonics versus routine uterotonics alone on PPH in low risk women after vaginal delivery. The hypothesis is that combination of sublingual misoprostol and routine uterotonics is more effective than routine uterotonics alone in reduction of PPH in low risk women after vaginal delivery.
The aim of the work is to compare the efficacy of preoperative IV tranexamic acid and rectal misoprostol in reducing blood loss in the elective cesarean section. Research question: In women undergoing elective cesarean section, is preoperative administration of IV tranexamic acid better than rectal misoprostol in reducing blood loss?
The miscarriage is one of the adverse outcomes of pregnancy and is responsible for stress and anxiety of the couple. there are different types of miscarriages.missed miscarriage also known as early fetal demise is one of the type of miscarriage in which patient is mostly asymptomatic but Ultrasound shows absent fetal cardiac activity.Traditionally surgical evacuation of uterus was the treatment of choice for miscarriage.The treatment of miscarriage has evolved significantly in recent years.medical management using misoprostol is the newest treatment option.Misoprostol is a synthetic prostaglandin E(1) analogue that is commonly used for medical miscarriage It can be given orally, vaginally and sublingually.
The purpose of this study is to specifically investigate whether oxytocin and mechanical dilation decreases the rate of cesarean section compared to misoprostol and mechanical dilation for pregnancies at risk of fetal compromise
The goal of the study is to determine whether important clinical outcomes differ among women who access a combined medical abortion regimen from a pharmacy when compared with those who access it from a facility.
In France, drug-induced abortion is allowed up to 9SA, after which the surgical route is preferred. Mifepristone 600mg is used 36-48 hours before the introduction of Misoprostol. This is recommended orally at a dose of 400 μg. There are currently several studies on the subject, including a meta-analysis of the 2011 Cochrane Database, but doses, routes of administration and gestational age differ in all studies. Currently, HAS recommends the vaginal route at the dose of 800μg for stopped pregnancies. It is therefore necessary to compare the different routes of administration of Misoprostol at the same dose to allow to change our French recommendations on the medicinal abortion and perhaps also to recommend the vaginal route in this indication.
This randomized controlled study will be performed to compare the benefits and risks associated with the administration of misoprostol with or without the use of a transcervical balloon catheter to terminate pregnancy in the second trimester (defined as gestational age between 14 and 28 weeks of gestation).
Surgical abortion in the late first trimester and early second trimester is usually performed with the aid of a cervical preparing agent, which helps to open up the uterine cervix for the procedure. Routine use of cervical preparants is recommended by several organizations during this period of pregnancy before surgical abortion, especially in younger women or those who have not delivered a baby, because their cervices may be more difficult to dilate without a preparant. The standard medication used for cervical preparation is misoprostol. Unfortunately, misoprostol may cause uncomfortable uterine cramping and vaginal bleeding in patients who use it. Another medication called mifepristone has been shown to dilate the cervix better than misoprostol in the first trimester, but little information exists about using mifepristone in the late first trimester and early second trimester. The investigators plan to perform a prospective, double-blind, randomized trial to evaluate if mifepristone is a better cervical preparant than misoprostol. A total of 110 participants who are pregnant women desiring pregnancy termination 11 to 15 weeks gestational age will be recruited. Half will receive mifepristone and the other half misoprostol. The investigators will measure the amount of cervical dilation achieved right before a surgical abortion to determine if mifepristone is significantly different than misoprostol as a cervical preparant at this stage of pregnancy. The investigators expect that mifepristone will work better than misoprostol for this purpose. The investigators hope to generate information about mifepristone so that women and their health care providers can know more about mifepristone as an option for cervical preparation before surgical abortion.