Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05641363 |
Other study ID # |
KETODOSE20221107 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Recruiting |
Phase |
Phase 3
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
June 1, 2023 |
Est. completion date |
February 2025 |
Study information
Verified date |
September 2023 |
Source |
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Hospital Scene #1: A 6-year-old arrives in the Emergency Department at McMaster Children's
Hospital (MCH) complaining of pain in his lower right side. His Dad explains the pain has
been going on for a few hours and that Advil and Tyelnol haven't helped at all. He's anxious
and concerned about his son because he never complains about pain - so this must be bad.
After he has been seen by the doctor, the appendix appears to be the problem and the boy
needs to have it removed. Dad wants his son's pain to go away but is worried because he once
got a high dose of a medication and had some unwanted side effects.
Hospital Scene #2: A 14-year-old girl has been experiencing migraine headaches for the past
months and is awaiting an appointment with a specialist. Today, however, the pain is the
worst it's been. Mom has picked her up from school and brought her to MCH not knowing what
else to do to help her. The Advil and Tylenol have not improved her pain. She desperately
wants the pain to go away but is worried because she read that some pain medicines are used
without any studies done to see if they work and if they are safe.
(https://www.ottawalife.com/article/most-medications-prescribed-to-children-have-not-been-ade
quately-studied?c=9).
In both cases, these children need medicine to help their pain. The treating doctors want to
give them pain medicine that will 1) be safe and 2) make the pain go away. This is what
parents and the child/teenager, and the doctors want too. Some pain medicines like opioids
are often used to help with pain in children. Unfortunately, opioids can have bad side
effects and can, when used incorrectly or for a long time, be addictive and even dangerous. A
better option would be a non-opioid, like Ketorolac, which also helps pain but is safer and
has fewer side effects. The information doctors have about how much Ketorolac to give a
child, though, is what has been learned from research in adults. Like with any medication,
the smallest amount that a child can take while still getting pain relief is best and safest.
Why give more medicine and have a higher risk of getting a side effect, if a lower dose will
do the trick? This is what the researchers don't know about Ketorolac and what this study
aims to find out.
Children 6-17 years old who are reporting bad pain when they are in the Emergency Department
or admitted in hospital and who will be getting an intravenous line in their arm will be
included in the study. Those who want to participate will understand that the goal of the
study is to find out if a smaller amount of medicine improves pain as much as a larger
amount. By random chance, like flipping a coin, the child will be placed into a treatment
group. The difference between these treatment groups is the amount of Ketorolac they will
get. One treatment will be the normal dose that doctors use at MCH, and the other two doses
will be smaller. Neither the patient, parent nor doctor will know how much Ketorolac they are
getting. Over two hours, the research nurse or assistant will ask the child how much pain
they are in. Our research team will also measure how much time it took for the pain to get
better, and whether the child had to take any other medicine to help with pain. The research
team will also ask families and patients some questions to understand their perceptions of
pain control, pain medicines and side effects they know of.
This research is important because it may change the way that doctors treat children with
pain, not just at MCH but around the world. The results of this study will be shared with
doctors through conferences and scientific papers. It's also important that clinicians share
information with parents and children so that they can understand more about pain medicines
and how these medicines can be used safely with the lowest chance of side effects.
Description:
Comparison of Ketorolac at Three Doses In Children With Acute Pain: A Randomized Controlled
Trial (KETODOSE TRIAL)
Background: Despite the ongoing opioid crisis, opioids remain a commonly prescribed analgesic
for patients with acute pain. Ketorolac is the leading parenteral non-steroidal
anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) in Canada commonly used in the Emergency Department (ED) and
inpatient settings for acute abdominal pain and migraine headaches. Though it has safer
adverse event profile than opioids, its use in children is off label as there are virtually
no pediatric trials to inform this practice. Currently the recommended dosing for children is
0.5 mg/kg to a maximum dose of 30 mg. Recent trials with adults have shown no added analgesic
benefit to higher doses of ketorolac, when comparing 10 mg to 15 mg or 30 mg, intravenous
(IV). A lower dose will be desirable if it achieves similar reduction of pain, as it allows
for safer cumulative daily dosing and lower rates of adverse events. This has led many
physicians to change their adult practice to a maximum dose of 10 mg IV; however, despite
their smaller size, most children continue to be exposed to doses of 30 mg IV, due to a lack
of similar available evidence.
Research Question: In children aged 6 - 17 years, with moderate to severe pain (measured
using the 11-point verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS)), who are prescribed IV Ketorolac by
their treating physician, is low-dose IV Ketorolac (0.25 mg/kg/dose up to 10 mg OR 0.5
mg/kg/dose up to 10 mg) non-inferior (NI) to standard treatment (0.5 mg/kg/dose up to 30 mg)
in reducing mean pain scores within a NI margin of 1?
Study Design: Our trial is a single-center, block randomized, double-dummy, double-blind,
three-arm, controlled trial with parallel groups. Participants will include: (i) ≥6 years;
(ii) with moderate-severe pain (defined as VNRS > 4; (iii) seen in the ED or inpatient
setting; and (iv) who have an IV access planned/available. These individuals will be
randomized to an arm with active ketorolac and a 'placebo' ketorolac of a differing dose, to
maintain blinding through the double-dummy design: (1) standard-dose ketorolac (0.5 mg/kg IV
up to 30 mg IV) + low-dose ketorolac placebo; (2) low-dose ketorolac (0.25 mg/kg up IV up to
10 mg IV) + standard-dose ketorolac placebo; or (3) low-dose ketorolac (0.5 mg/kg IV up to 10
mg) + standard-dose ketorolac placebo.
Participants will be allowed any other non-NSAID rescue therapy at any point after our trial
drugs are administered, based on clinical team discretion. Based on available adult
literature, a chosen NI margin of 1 point (50% of the established MID), an expected mean
difference of 0.2 on the VNRS, and standard deviation of 1.5 points, 57 participants will be
needed in each group to achieve a 5% alpha at 80% power.
Primary Outcomes: Between each low-dose ketorolac group and standard group mean differences
in pain as measured on VNRS at 60 minutes.
Summary: Acute pain requiring parenteral analgesia is very common amongst Canadian
children.Despite data in adults and children supporting preferential NSAID use for acute
pain, significant gaps in knowledge regarding safe and effective Ketorolac dosing in children
still exists. The drug's superior adverse effect profile and lack of dependence and abuse
potential, makes this an appropriate than opioids, and is not known to be a substance of
misuse.