View clinical trials related to Migraine.
Filter by:This study examines the use of an AI-powered virtual assistant for quickly identifying and handling neurological emergencies, particularly in places with limited medical resources. The research aimed to check if this AI tool is safe and accurate enough to move on to more advanced testing stages. In a first-of-its-kind trial, the virtual assistant was tested with patients having urgent neurological issues. Neurologists first reviewed the AI's recommendations using clinical records and then assessed its performance directly with patients. The findings were as follows: neurologists agreed with the AI's decisions nearly all the time, and the AI outperformed earlier versions of Chat GPT in every tested aspect. Patients and doctors found the AI to be highly effective, rating it as excellent or very good in most cases. This suggests the AI could significantly enhance how quickly and accurately neurological emergencies are dealt with, although further trials are needed before it can be widely used.
There is limited and insufficient information on the effects of inappropriate living environments, exposure to allergens, electromagnetic fields and stress factors on the chronicity of migraine. The aim of this study is to investigate the frequency of environmental variables/triggers in episodic and chronic migraine patients and their relationship with clinical variables in the chronic migraine group. The results obtained will be shared not only in the scientific community, but also on workplace health and employer-related platforms, including "Wellbeing" groups.
Migraine is a chronic disorder that causes disability. Episodic migraine can be managed by prophylactic medical treatment or interventional pain procedures. Interventional methods used in migraine treatment are greater occipital nerve blockade, lesser occipital nerve blockade, supraorbital nerve blockade, infraorbital nerve blockade, sphenopalatine ganglion blockade, botulinum toxin injection and various radiofrequency applications. The effectiveness of greater occipital nerve blockade and transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion blockade in the treatment of migraine has been proven in various studies.We aimed to evaluate the effects of repetitive greater occipital nerve blockade and transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion blockade in patients with episodic migraine.
Migraine, which is characterized by attacks and many accompanying symptoms, negatively affects the quality of life of patients. Although different methods have been tried for migraine, there is no definitive treatment approach yet. The aim of this study is to examine the effect of fascia exercises as a new approach on the symptoms and complaints of migraine patients. The study was completed with 30 volunteer migraine patients. Participants were divided into two groups in a randomized controlled manner. While head-neck and breathing exercises were applied to the control group, fascial pattern exercises were performed in the study group in addition to these exercises. This protocol was applied 2 days a week for 6 weeks. Pain intensity, quality of life and sleep, heart rate changes, depression and anxiety levels and satisfaction levels were evaluated before and after the treatment. Fascial pattern exercises are an effective approach on the symptoms and complaints of migraine patients and can be adopted as a complementary application in migraine treatment. Since this is the first study in this field, it needs to be supported by other studies in order to increase the provability of the effectiveness of the exercises.
The goal of this observational study is to retrospectively observe the effect of PFO closure and medication on migraine. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Whether PFO closure is more effective in the treatment of migraine than traditional medical treatment - What factors affect the effectiveness of migraine treatment ? Participants will undergo contrast transthoracic echocardiography to diagnose PFO and evaluate right-to-left shunt. They will be treated with medication and PFO closure respectively according to guidelines. HIT-6 and a questionnaire about migraine were obtained at the baseline and repeated at the 6-month and 12-month follow-up visits. Researchers will compare closure group and drug group to see efficacy of two groups in treating migraine.
Randomized, two-way, two-period, single oral dose, open-label, crossover, bioequivalence study to compare Ibuprofen/ Paracetamol tablets (200mg Ibuprofen/ 500mg Paracetamol) versus Nuromol® tablets (200mg Ibuprofen/ 500mg Paracetamol) in healthy subjects under fasting condition.
Migraine is a prevalent neurological disorder that severely impacts both children and adolescents, causing significant disability. Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) is a nonpharmacological, prescribed, wearable device, FDA-cleared for acute and/or preventive treatment of migraine with or without aura in patients 12 years or older. Multiple studies have shown that REN has high safety, tolerability, and efficacy in adults and adolescents. This study aims to evaluate REN's real-world safety and efficacy in pre-adolescents, 9-11 years old.
The goal of this clinical trial is to study and describe the effects of bilateral tDCS applied to dorso-lateral-prefrontal cortex (DLPC) in patients with drug-resistant migraine in terms of reduction in frequency of pain, impact of pain in daily life, quality of sleep and psychological measures. We finally planned to include high frequency and chronic migraine patients. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Will bilateral DLPC tDCS be feasible, well tolerated and safe in drug resistant migraine patients? - Will bilateral DLPC tDCS be effective in reducing pain frequency, intensity and its impact in daily life activities? - Will bilateral DLPC tDCS be effective in ameliorating sleep and psychological associated symptoms? - Will bilateral DLPC tDCS be such effective in reducing pain frequency, intensity and its impact in daily life activities as anti-CGRP treatments? Participants will undergo 2 tDCS sessions daily for 2 consecutive weeks. Patients will be blinded to treatment and will be divided in two groups (real vs placebo). A third group of patients, age-matched to the other two, will undergo anti-CGRP treatment. Patients will be asked to complete Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROMs) scales at baseline, one week after the end of the treatment and at 6 months after the end of the treatment. Researchers (blinded to the treatment) will compare the group that underwent real tDCS treatment vs the one that underwent placebo tDCS vs the one that underwent anti-CGRP drugs to see if bilateral DLPC tDCS is effective in reducing migraine frequency, intensity and impact and if bilateral DLPC tDCS is such effective as anti-CGRP treatment.
Migraine is a very common condition characterised by frequent severe headaches that are very debilitating. Although the frequency and severity does reduce as patient's age, particularly above the age of 70, in younger and working age people this condition has a significant impact on people's lives. Patients with migraine are typically diagnosed and managed in primary care, but can also be treated by neurologists. Recently, NHS England has published guidance for clinical staff to optimise patient management: reduce admissions to hospital for migraine and improve the setting in which patients are seen. One recommendation is the increased use of headache diaries by patients. These may help patients and doctors to improve migraine diagnosis and its treatment, for example by identifying if there are triggers for getting a migraine attack. With technological advancements, there are now computer/phone applications (Apps) that can be used instead of a paper diary. The Curelator N1 Headache App is one of such migraine specific Apps. In this study, the investigators aim to evaluate if primary care migraine patients are open to using a digital headache diary App, and how compliant users of the App will be. The investigators also aim to assess patient feedback on the use of the N1 Headache App, and if its use aids them in the management of their migraine.
This investigation describes a proposed clinical trial that will evaluate the relative efficacy of intravenous magnesium sulfate for the treatment of migraine compared to intravenous metoclopramide (Reglan) and intravenous prochlorperazine (Compazine) in the treatment of acute headache and migraine in adult patients. The ultimate objective will be clinical application of these drugs in the emergency department for the treatment of acute headache and migraine. The two phenothiazines (metoclopramide and prochlorperazine) have been routinely utilized in the treatment of acute headache and migraine in the emergency department setting. Per the 2017 American Headache Society guidelines, both intravenous metoclopramide and intravenous procholorperazine are recommended as "clinicians should offer" agents with level B evidence. Of note, there are no agents with level A evidence purported by this guideline for acute management of migraine. The same guideline offers "no recommendation can be made regarding the role of intravenous magnesium for adults who present to the ED with acute migraine. However intravenous magnesium may be of benefit to patients who present with migraine with aura." Multiple trials have evaluated intravenous magnesium's safety and efficacy in the management of acute migraine. These have demonstrated the tolerability of intravenous magnesium on a with breadth of patients. Most commonly the primary adverse event was flushing which self-resolved. No cases of hypotension were reported. None of these study agents have been withdrawn from the market.