View clinical trials related to Migraine.
Filter by:Case series, repeated-measures design, pilot study. Adult, female, migraine patients underwent seven Ischemic Compression Myofascial Trigger Points (IC-MTrPs) therapy sessions. The aim of the study is to investigate whether therapy of the shoulder girdle and neck muscles by deactivating MTrPs causes modification of biomechanical and biochemical variables in the blood and reduces headache in people with migraine, improving their quality of life by improving their health. People qualified for the study were divided into 3 groups according to the type of migraine: 1. CM group - patients with chronic migraine 2. EMa group - patients with paroxysmal migraine with aura 3. EMb group - patients with paroxysmal migraine without an aura. All patients underwent 7 interventions in the area of the muscles of the shoulder girdle and neck (by deactivating trigger points) performed every 2 or 3 days. They did not take any headache medications during the treatment period. However, during a migraine attack, they could undergo treatments and research measurements. Biomechanical measurements of the cervical spine, shoulder girdle muscles and blood chemistry were performed before, during and after the patients' therapy. All treatments were performed on the following muscles: - m. trapesius pars descendent (trapezius upper), - m. sternocleidomastoideus (sternocleidomastoid), - m. temporalis (temporal), - m. legator scapulae (levator scapula), - m. supraspinatus (supraspinatus), - m. suboccipitales (suboccipital).
Hospital Scene #1: A 6-year-old arrives in the Emergency Department at McMaster Children's Hospital (MCH) complaining of pain in his lower right side. His Dad explains the pain has been going on for a few hours and that Advil and Tyelnol haven't helped at all. He's anxious and concerned about his son because he never complains about pain - so this must be bad. After he has been seen by the doctor, the appendix appears to be the problem and the boy needs to have it removed. Dad wants his son's pain to go away but is worried because he once got a high dose of a medication and had some unwanted side effects. Hospital Scene #2: A 14-year-old girl has been experiencing migraine headaches for the past months and is awaiting an appointment with a specialist. Today, however, the pain is the worst it's been. Mom has picked her up from school and brought her to MCH not knowing what else to do to help her. The Advil and Tylenol have not improved her pain. She desperately wants the pain to go away but is worried because she read that some pain medicines are used without any studies done to see if they work and if they are safe. (https://www.ottawalife.com/article/most-medications-prescribed-to-children-have-not-been-ade quately-studied?c=9). In both cases, these children need medicine to help their pain. The treating doctors want to give them pain medicine that will 1) be safe and 2) make the pain go away. This is what parents and the child/teenager, and the doctors want too. Some pain medicines like opioids are often used to help with pain in children. Unfortunately, opioids can have bad side effects and can, when used incorrectly or for a long time, be addictive and even dangerous. A better option would be a non-opioid, like Ketorolac, which also helps pain but is safer and has fewer side effects. The information doctors have about how much Ketorolac to give a child, though, is what has been learned from research in adults. Like with any medication, the smallest amount that a child can take while still getting pain relief is best and safest. Why give more medicine and have a higher risk of getting a side effect, if a lower dose will do the trick? This is what the researchers don't know about Ketorolac and what this study aims to find out. Children 6-17 years old who are reporting bad pain when they are in the Emergency Department or admitted in hospital and who will be getting an intravenous line in their arm will be included in the study. Those who want to participate will understand that the goal of the study is to find out if a smaller amount of medicine improves pain as much as a larger amount. By random chance, like flipping a coin, the child will be placed into a treatment group. The difference between these treatment groups is the amount of Ketorolac they will get. One treatment will be the normal dose that doctors use at MCH, and the other two doses will be smaller. Neither the patient, parent nor doctor will know how much Ketorolac they are getting. Over two hours, the research nurse or assistant will ask the child how much pain they are in. Our research team will also measure how much time it took for the pain to get better, and whether the child had to take any other medicine to help with pain. The research team will also ask families and patients some questions to understand their perceptions of pain control, pain medicines and side effects they know of. This research is important because it may change the way that doctors treat children with pain, not just at MCH but around the world. The results of this study will be shared with doctors through conferences and scientific papers. It's also important that clinicians share information with parents and children so that they can understand more about pain medicines and how these medicines can be used safely with the lowest chance of side effects.
To investigate whether administration of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) binding monoclonal antibodies eptinezumab prevents pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide-38 (PACAP-38) induced migraine attacks in migraine without aura patients.
The goal of this clinical trial is to test an app-based biofeedback treatment in adults with migraine. The aim of the study is to investigate the safety and effectiveness of biofeedback treatment using the medical device Cerebri, compared to wait-list controls. Participants will perform 10 minutes biofeedback daily, in addition to daily registrations in the headache diary. Wait-list controls will complete daily registrations in the headache diary during the same period. Researchers will compare the reduction in the number of days with migraine from baseline per 28-day period between treatment group and the wait-list group.
Migraine may have an adverse effect on physical, cognitive, and psychosocial functioning. It causes major consequences for the quality of life of the sufferer and a major burden on the health care system. About the physiopathology, two opposing processes, depression (habituation) and facilitation (sensitization), determine the final behavioural outcome after a sequence of repetitive stimuli. Sensitization is a general behavioural response of augmentation to innocuous sensory and noxious stimuli. It has been associated with a dysfunction in descending pain inhibition. The nature or intensity of a painful event does not strongly relate to the development of chronic pain, but an individual's behavioural response to the event contributes to chronicity. Imaging data have identified that chronic pain may change the structure of the brain in response to environmental demands. It suggests that the brain of healthy control has a "healthy response" to frequent nociceptive input, such as "habituation", while chronic pain patients show a "maladaptive plasticity". Habituation is "a response decrement as a result of repeated stimulation". It is a phenomenon observed in the autonomic and behavioural component called the "orienting response" in humans. The orienting response is elicited when a novel stimulus is encountered, and it directs attention toward that stimulus. When the same stimulus is presented repeatedly occur habituation. Researchers have found a number of physiological mechanisms associated with Orienting response. Habituation of the orienting response is a simple form of learning and acts an attentional filtering mechanism that makes people able to select what is part of their present goal and adapt to environment. In this way only one channel of information to be processed, with the rest filtered out. Habituation depends on a memory process whereby the organism learns to associate goal irrelevant stimuli with a no-consequence response. Lack of Habituation during stimulus repetition is a functional property of the brain in people with migraine between attacks. Thalamo-cortical dysrhythmia and lack of H characterize migraineurs' brains. This abnormal information processing increases during the pain-free days, the vertex is just before the attack, and decreases in the ictal phase. Migraineurs are characterized by a generally increased sensitivity to visual (sensitivity to light), auditory (to sound), or somatic stimuli not only during the attack, but also outside of the attack. It was confirmed also by analysing motor cortex excitability. Aerobic exercises may be effective as pharmacological treatment in the management of migraine and focused attention task may help human subjects to better ignore irrelevant stimuli. The main aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of a non-pharmacological treatment, such as physical therapy, with a specific dual task protocol of active exercise with concomitant cognitive tasks, in relation to habituation (Transcranial magnetic stimulation) and sensitization (Algometer assessment) neurophysiological outcomes. The second aim is to assess these non-pharmacological treatments concerning to clinical outcomes (intensity of pain, duration of attacks and frequency of pain; neurophysiological test on executive functions).
The researchers propose a three-arm pilot study of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) delivered via telephone (Telephone), video (Video) or online education modules (Online).
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of different exercise types and combinations on migraine attacks in patients with chronic migraine.
Migraine attacks are episodic disorder that affects approximately 12% of the population, and studies have shown that 41-48% of migraineurs have a combination of patent foramen ovale (PFO). Clinical Observational studies have been linking PFO occlusion with the effectiveness in improving migraine symptoms and reducing the frequency of attacks. However, several RCTs have shown negative primary results, making it unclear whether PFO occlusion is effective in treating migraine. Our study is a prospective, double-blind, multi-center, and randomized study designed to test the effectiveness of migraine alleviation by performing percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in patients who are also diagnosed with PFO and migraine.
This is a cross-sectional, real-world observational, community pharmacy-based study in which adults treated with a triptan for their migraine will self-report productivity and activity impairment using a web-based portal or paper-based questionnaire.
This is a multicenter, open-label trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AXS-07 in subjects with migraine attacks and prior inadequate response to oral CGRP inhibitors.