Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04192708
Other study ID # chevalier
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase Phase 4
First received
Last updated
Start date February 17, 2020
Est. completion date November 2020

Study information

Verified date July 2020
Source Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University
Contact Jie Jia, Master
Phone 8613641839213
Email jiajie@eentanesthesia.com
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Background: Children with microtia complain of severe postoperative pain during early postoperative days after rib cartilage harvest for auricular reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of intercostal nerve block (ICNB) and paravertebral block(PV) for preventing postoperative pain after rib cartilage graft for auricular reconstruction in children with microtia.

Methods: In this prospective randomized study, 144 children will be enrolled in this study and randomized into 3 groups:48 patients will received ultrasound-guided ICNB(UG-ICNB group);48 patients will receive ICNB under direct vision (DV-ICNB group) and 48 patients will receive paravertebral block(PV group) undergoing postoperative pain control using either preventive ICNB followed by catheter-based infusion (33 patients, study group) or intravenous (IV) analgesia alone (33 patients, control group). ICNB will be performed by injecting 1% lidocaine plus 1/200000 epinephrine 3ml into each of three intercostal spaces before perichondrial dissection. PV will be carried out by injecting 1% lidocaine plus 1/200000 epinephrine 9ml into T7 paravertebral space just after induction of anesthesia.before wound closure.Each patient receive patient-controlled intravenous analgesia(PCIA) after surgery.Severity of pain,nausea,vomiting and other side effects would be assessed for the postoperative period of 48 hours.


Description:

Patients are randomly allocated to one of three groups: receiving intercostal nerve block under direct vision (DV-ICNB group) or receiving intercostal nerve block under ultrasound guidance (UG-ICNB group) or receiving thoracic paravertebral block (PV group) with a block of 6 and 1:1 allocation ratio. . Enrolment and data collection are performed by trained research staff who are not involved in the care of the patients. The treating clinicians are not blinded to the assignment group, but all other staff involved in both the collection and assessment of data are blinded to group allocation.

The primary outcomes is the pain severity,intraoperative fentanyl consumption ,patient-controlled intravenous analgesia(PCIA) requirement and severity of nausea and vomiting during the period of postoperative 48 hours. The secondary outcomes are blood loss during harvesting rib cartilage,fentanyl consumption in post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU),time from PACU arrival to first obtainable pain score,first time of urination,duration of PACU stay and postoperative adverse events such as respiratory depression(defined as respiratory rate <8bpm, requirement of naloxone, and/or peripheral oxygen saturation <90%),pneumothorax and pruritus.

Based on our previous clinical observation, 2.7(SD 0.5)μg/kg of fentanyl is required in DV-ICNB group.We suppose that the requirement could be reduce by 0.3μg/kg in UG-ICNB and PV group .Thus,42 patients are required to detect a significant difference among the groups at a significance level of 95% and a power of 80%. 20 patients were finally enrolled in the study due to possible dropouts (20%).

The continuous variables were expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD) whereas categorical variables were expressed as frequency and percentage for data description. Continous data with a normal distribution is manifested as mean±SD and assessed by Unpaired sample t-test ;continous data with skewed distribution is presented as median(interquartile range,IQR) and assessed by Man-Whitney U test ;categorical data are presented as number and assessed by Chi-square/Fisher exact test. The VAS scores,PCIA consumption and severity of nausea and vomiting of the three groups at multiple time points were analyzed via two-way repeated-measures Anova .


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 144
Est. completion date November 2020
Est. primary completion date September 2020
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 8 Years to 16 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

1. Clinical diagnosis of microtia

2. Scheduled for rib cartilage harvest from three ribs for auricular reconstruction.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Requirement for additional surgery

2. Rib cartilage harvest from more or less than three ribs

3. History of analgesic administration (eg, opioids, acetaminophen, or 4.Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) 24 hours before premedication

5.History of coagulation disorders or allergy to local anesthetics 6.History of renal insufficiency or an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status that was higher than II 7.Inability to express pain scores or severity of nausea 8.Inability to understand PCIA device use 9.Parental objection to ICNBs or paravertebral block.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
intercostal nerve block under direct vision
When the intercostal nerve is adequated exposed,a surgeon use a 5ml syringe to perform the block and the needle is tilted 15 degree cephalad and advanced towards the caudal rim of the lib,and penetration depth is about 5mm.Then 1% lidocaine and 1/200000 epinephrine 3ml will be injected when negative aspiration of gas or blood.Same procedure will be repeted in the other two exposed intercostal spaces.
intercostal nerve block under ultrasound guidance
After induction ,an ultrasonographic probe (M-Turbo with the L25 transducer; SonoSite Inc.) is used to scan laterally from the midaxillary line to identify the required anatomic landmarks, while the patients are in a lateral decubitus position. The ribs are identified as hyperechoic streaks, while the pleura appeared as hyperechoic lines between and below the ribs.The needle was advanced towards the caudal rim of the rib until the distal tip is just between the innermost and inner intercostal muscle.1% lidocaine and 1/200000 epinephrine 3ml will be injected when negative aspiration of gas or blood.Same procedure will be repeted in the other two exposed intercostal spaces.
paravertebral block under ultrasound guidance
Paravertebral block is performed between the thoracic segments T7-8,A linear ultrasound transducer (M-Turbo with the L25×transducer; SonoSite Inc.) is placed to parallel the T7 transverse process so as to identify the T7 spinous process,the T7 transverse process and 7th lib.Then move the probe caudally until the thoracic paravertebral space (TPVS) which is bounded by transverse process,pleura and internal intercostal membrane.Using in-plane technique, we advance the 20-gauge needle(Becton Dickinson Infusion Therapy Sysstems Inc.Sandy,Utah 84070,USA.1.88",1.1×48mm) until the needle tip penetrates the internal intercostal membrane,9ml mixture of 1% lidocaine and 1/200000 epinephrine after no blood or gas is aspirated.Both PVB and ultrasound-guided ICNB is performed by the same anesthesiologist

Locations

Country Name City State
China The Eye,Ear,Nose and throat Hospital ,Fudan University Shanghai

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

References & Publications (5)

Lukosiene L, Macas A, Trepenaitis D, Kalibatiene L, Malcius D, Barauskas V. Single shot intercostal block for pain management in pediatric patients undergoing the Nuss procedure: a double-blind, randomized, controlled study. J Pediatr Surg. 2014 Dec;49(12):1753-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.09.014. Epub 2014 Oct 1. — View Citation

Lukosiene L, Rugyte DC, Macas A, Kalibatiene L, Malcius D, Barauskas V. Postoperative pain management in pediatric patients undergoing minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum: the role of intercostal block. J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Dec;48(12):2425-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.08.016. — View Citation

Nagata S. A new method of total reconstruction of the auricle for microtia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993 Aug;92(2):187-201. — View Citation

Vemula R, Kutzin M, Greco G, Kutzin T. The use of intercostal nerve blocks for implant-based breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jul;132(1):178e-80e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182911018. — View Citation

Willschke H, Marhofer P, Bösenberg A, Johnston S, Wanzel O, Cox SG, Sitzwohl C, Kapral S. Ultrasonography for ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blocks in children. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Aug;95(2):226-30. Epub 2005 May 27. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Chest pain at rest Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain) Time1:0 minute after the first pain score could be obtained from the patient
Primary Chest pain at rest Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain) Time2: 3 hours after surgery
Primary Chest pain at rest Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain) Time3: 6 hours after surgery
Primary Chest pain at rest Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain) Time4: 24 hours after surgery
Primary Chest pain at rest Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain) Time5: 48 hours after surgery
Primary Chest pain during deep breath Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain) Time1:0 minute after the first pain score could be obtained from the patient
Primary Chest pain during deep breath Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain) Time2: 3 hours after surgery
Primary Chest pain during deep breath Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain) Time3: 6 hours after surgery
Primary Chest pain during deep breath Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain) Time4: 24 hours after surgery
Primary Chest pain during deep breath Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain) Time5: 48 hours after surgery
Primary Ear pain at rest Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain) Time1:0 minute after the first pain score could be obtained from the patient
Primary Ear pain at rest Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain) Time2: 3 hours after surgery
Primary Ear pain at rest Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain) Time3: 6 hours after surgery
Primary Ear pain at rest Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain) Time4: 24 hours after surgery
Primary Ear pain at rest Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain) Time5: 48 hours after surgery
Primary Ear pain during deep breath Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain) Time1:0 minute after the first pain score could be obtained from the patient
Primary Ear pain during deep breath Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain) Time2: 3 hours after surgery
Primary Ear pain during deep breath Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain) Time3: 6 hours after surgery
Primary Ear pain during deep breath Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain) Time4: 24 hours after surgery
Primary Ear pain during deep breath Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain) Time5: 48 hours after surgery
Primary PCIA consumption Assessed by consumption of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia Time1:3 hours after surgery
Primary PCIA consumption Assessed by consumption of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia Time2:6 hours after surgery
Primary PCIA consumption Assessed by consumption of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia Time3:24 hours after surgery
Primary PCIA consumption Assessed by consumption of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia Time4:48 hours after surgery
Primary Nausea severity Assessed by Verbal Rating Scale(VRS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain) Time1:3 hours after surgery
Primary Nausea severity Assessed by Verbal Rating Scale(VRS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain) Time2:6 hours after surgery
Primary Nausea severity Assessed by Verbal Rating Scale(VRS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain) Time3:24 hours after surgery
Primary Nausea severity Assessed by Verbal Rating Scale(VRS),(0,no pain;10,the worst pain) Time4:48 hours after surgery
Primary Number of vomiting Assessed by vomiting times after surgery Time1:3 hours after surgery
Primary Number of vomiting Assessed by vomiting times after surgery Time2:6 hours after surgery
Primary Number of vomiting Assessed by vomiting times after surgery Time3:24 hours after surgery
Primary Number of vomiting Assessed by vomiting times after surgery Time4:48 hours after surgery
Primary Intraoperative fentanyl requirement Assessed by total requirement of fentanyl( µg/kg) during the surgery Time1:0 minute after surgery
Secondary The first time of urination Assessed by the duration(hour) between end of surgery and the first time of urination Time1:0 minute after the first time of urination
Secondary Blood loss during harvesting rib cartilage Assessed by the blood loss(ml)
) when surgeons are harvesting rib cartilage for auricular reconstruction
Time1:0 minute after all three rib cartilage are harvested
Secondary Fentanyl requirement in PACU Assessed by total additional requirement of fentanyl for keeping VAS scores less than '5' Time1:0 minute after departure from the PACU
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05288790 - Microbiome Metabolites and Alcohol in HIV to Reduce CVD RCT Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05963659 - Nitrate Modulates Cognitive Impairment Via Oral Microbiota. N/A
Completed NCT04130321 - Demonstration of the Prebiotic-like Effects of Camu-camu Consumption Against Obesity-related Disorders in Humans N/A
Recruiting NCT05929976 - InterNatIonal CHildhood Leukemia Microbiome/MEtabolome Cohort
Withdrawn NCT04230746 - Effect of Antibiotics on Urinary Microbiome Early Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT06289283 - Microbiota in Urine and Urothelium Can be a Factor for Induction of Urinary Bladder Cancer. The Study Will Examine Urine and Bladder Cancer Tissues From Male Patients and Urine of Controls Using Whole Genomic Sequencing Techniques and 16S rRNA. The Aim is to Elucidate Role of Microbiota in Bladder
Recruiting NCT05714566 - Research on Gut Microbiome and Metabolomics Alterations in C.Difficile Infected IBD Patients
Enrolling by invitation NCT06225336 - Subcutaneous Implant Combination Product (AUR-201) in Patients With Unilateral Microtia (Australia) Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05068362 - Auricular Reconstruction in Microtia by Medpor Implant Following Tissue Expansion N/A
Completed NCT02224677 - Craniofacial Microsomia: Longitudinal Outcomes in Children Pre-Kindergarten (CLOCK)
Not yet recruiting NCT05615116 - Clinical Study on the Distribution of Digestive Tract Microbiota Before and After Ileocecal Resection in Crohn's Disease
Enrolling by invitation NCT06220994 - the Gut Microbiome and Metabolomics in Chronic Lower extreMities Threatening Ischemia
Completed NCT00958802 - Tissue Engineering Microtia Auricular Reconstruction: in Vitro and in Vivo Studies Phase 0
Recruiting NCT06087874 - Preventive Effect of Perinatal Oral Probiotic Supplementation (POPS) on Neonatal Jaundice Phase 2
Suspended NCT03624608 - Evaluation of the Auryzon Devices in the Optimization of Ear and Nose Reconstruction Procedures N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06394687 - The Digestion of Protein Powders in Healthy Participants Using SIMBA and LIMBA Capsule N/A
Completed NCT05417360 - Akkermansia and Weight Maintenance N/A
Recruiting NCT02518035 - Silicone Gel to Improve Scar in Microtia Patients Phase 4
Recruiting NCT06078566 - Long-Term Follow-Up Study of Unilateral Microtia Patients Implanted With AUR-201 Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT06072040 - Subcutaneous Implant Combination Product (AUR-201) in Patients With Unilateral Microtia Phase 1/Phase 2