View clinical trials related to Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Filter by:This is a two arm, 2-center, Phase II, study of 5-FU, irinotecan, bevacizumab (FOLFIRI-beva) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Up to 155 patients will be screened for DTP-signature and up to 31 evaluable patients who are determined to be DTP-signature high will be treated with FOLFIRI-beva and HCQ. Patients will continue to receive treatments until evidence of disease progression, intolerable side effects, withdrawal of consent or death.
The overall objective of this study is to develop a novel couple-based mindfulness intervention aimed at reducing distress in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and their partners.
Colorectal cancer represents a major public health problem in France because of its high incidence and severe prognosis. Early stages of the disease are well know and have justified the establishment of a mass screening strategy. Unfortunately, the factors determining the progression to metastatic disease about them much harder to grasp. Various prognostic factors and predictors of treatment response have been identified and are being used but most of them are In practice, they are sometimes coarse and relatively little discriminant for patients. It is now possible to directly quantify the amount of circulating tumor cells in peripheral blood. Quantification of circulating tumor cells beyond a threshold of 3 cells/7,5 ml has been established as a major prognostic factor, and the rapid decrease in the number of these cells under treatment is also a predictor of response for patients suffering from metastatic colorectal cancer . Furthermore, it has also been shown that the quality and importance of the systemic and peritumoral inflammatory response in carcinomas, including colorectal, played a key role in the prognosis of patients. In particular, the presence of high levels of blood neutrophils has been raised by many studies as being followed by a poorer prognosis. However, the correlation between the presence of circulating tumor cells and high levels of neutrophils has never been studied. There is a rational to assume that this association exists, and secondly that the presence of circulating tumor cells in a proinflammatory environment represented by a high levels of blood neutrophils promotes metastasis by exerting a negative synergistic effect on the prognosis of patients. The main objective of this pilot study is to find a correlation between the amount of circulating neutrophils and the presence of circulating tumor cells in patients with colon cancer metastatic unresectable non-pretreated. The secondary objective is to investigate whether this association results in a negative synergistic effect in terms of progression-free survival and survival to one year. This is a non-interventional study. The investigators expect the inclusion in one year of thirty patients in two centers (University Hospital Centre Antoine Lacassagne Nice) to achieve these goals.
This is a prospective multicenter cohort study, was designed to explore the prognostic value of ctDNA as a biomarker of disease response and recurrence or death in patients undergoing curative-intent surgical resection of Colorectal cancer liver metastasis.
To explore the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of triweekly cetuximab in combination with capecitabine as first-line maintenance treatment for KRAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a single-arm, a single-center, Phase 1b trial. Meanwhile, Exploring the maximum tolerant dose or recommended II research dose of triweekly cetuximab combined with a fixed dose of capecitabine using '3+3' dose climbing Phase I experiment.
By virtue of an increased strategic use of cytotoxic and biological agents, and more options for locoregional treatment, the survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has improved considerably in the past decades. The personalized approach to systemic treatment is further aided by the use of complementary molecular biomarkers. However, the evolutionary dynamics of mCRC, a disease harnessed by multiple adaptive genetic alterations towards its final stages, poses a particular challenge to single-sample biomarker analyses and standardized linear treatment protocols. The aim of the On-treatment biomarkers in metastatic ColorectAL cancer for Life (On-CALL) study is to generate further knowledge on the evolutionary progression of mCRC during treatment, and to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the therapeutic failure still seen in a substantial number of patients. The On-CALL study is a prospective, single-arm observational study. All patients diagnosed with synchronous mCRC treated with curative intent at Skåne University Hospital will be invited to participate. Clinical and histopathological data will be compiled at study entry. An individual tissue microarray block with samples from resected primary tumours and metastases representing the full extent of the tumour spread will be constructed for each patient. Blood samples will be drawn for biomarker analyses at multiple time points prior to, during and after systemic treatment. DNA sequencing of tumour tissue and circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) will be performed to define the spatial clonal landscape in primary tumours and metastases, as well as over time.
The study is a phase II clinical study. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SBRT combined with Fruquintinib Plus PD-1/CTLA-4 Antibody for Third-line Treatment in mCRC.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and potential clinical benefits of ZN-c3 administered in combination with encorafenib and cetuximab in adult participants with metastatic BRAF V600E mutant colorectal cancer previously treated with one or two treatment regimens.
The purpose of the study is to investigate the effect and side effects of personalized cancer treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (bowel cancer). All patients included must have metastatic bowel cancer and receive or have received at least two lines of standard chemotherapy. The cancer must not be available for surgery with curative intent.
The goal of this exploratory phase I/II single-center clinical trial is to evaluate effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of Intravenous D-isoascorbic Acid (D-VC) With Arsenic Trioxide in Patients With Advanced/Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Have Exhausted Standard Therapy The main questions are to learn about effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of Intravenous D-isoascorbic Acid (D-VC) With Arsenic Trioxide. The study aims to: 1. Assess the tolerability and pharmacokinetics of D-isoascorbic acid (D-VC) with a single intravenous injection in the monotherapy regimen and in the sequential administration regimen with arsenic trioxide (ATO) in patients on standard therapy for advanced/metastatic malignancies (Phase I) 2. Evaluate the efficacy and safety of D-isoascorbic acid (D-VC) with repeated intravenous administration in the mode of sequential administration with arsenic trioxide (ATO) in patients who have exhausted standard therapy for advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer (Phase II) In phase I participants will receive single intravenous administration as monotherapy of D-isoascorbic acid (D-VC) with dose escalation (0.05, 0.1, 0.2 g/kg/day) and with arsenic trioxide (ATO). Patients who have satisfactorily tolerated the study drug in combination with arsenic trioxide (ATO) in a phase I study are transferred to a phase II clinical trial. To study the safety and efficacy of the study drug in phase II, D-VC after the administration of ATO will be implemented in 2 groups: Study group 1: ATO (at a dose of 0.15 mg / kg / day) after intravenous administration after 2 hours D-VC intravenously once a day at the maximum tolerated dose, determined at the end of phase I for at least 15 patients. Group 2 standard therapy: 15 patients. For the phase I researchers will compare laboratory tests (including clinical biochemistry and hematology), vital signs, clinical adverse events (diseases, symptoms and complaints) and other specific safety tests (for example, an electrocardiogram, ophthalmic examination) between groups. They will also measure the degree to which overt adverse reactions can be subjectively tolerated by the subject of the study. For the phase II researchers will compare degrees of tumor volume reduction on CT; objective response rate (ORR) based on BICR according to RECIST v1.1 between test and standard therapy groups. They will also continue evaluation of safety and tolerability of ATO + D-VC combination therapy.