View clinical trials related to Menorrhagia.
Filter by:This is an observational study in which patient data from the past of females with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is studied. • HMB describes menstrual periods with abnormally heavy or prolonged bleeding. Women concerned may not be able to maintain their usual activities during their period. Thus, HMB can reduce the quality of life and may lead to other medical problems. It is described that up to 30 of 100 women ask doctors for help concerning HMB during their fertile years. HMB is often not recognized and treated timely. In addition, there is little information about characteristics of women with HMB and real-world data on available treatments are missing. Despite the availability of non-invasive therapeutic options, for some women with severe HMB, surgical treatments (also called invasive) may be needed that can lead to infertility. - In this study researchers want to learn more about: - the percentage of women diagnosed with HMB - characteristics of these women like age at diagnosis or medical problems - treatment pathways of women with HMB in usual care Regarding treatment pathways, the researchers are especially interested in: - the percentage of women who use different therapeutic options over time - the percentage of women receiving invasive treatment for HMB after they received treatment as recommended by guidelines versus those not treated as recommended - To do this, researchers will collect information from five observational healthcare databases. Data will be from the year 2000 up to 2020. - Besides this data collection, no further tests or examinations are planned in this study. - In future, this information shall help to identify women with HMB and to learn what information may predict if invasive treatment will be needed later on.
In the present study, we test the ability of AMSS as a simple tool to identify women with HMB who have ID/ IDA. We will compare the AMSS score to patients' hemoglobin and serum ferritin in women with self-reported HMB and women with normal menstrual flow.
Uterine Fibroids (UF) are noncancerous (benign) tumors that commonly occur in up to 80% of women of reproductive age. Symptoms can include heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), low back pain, urinary frequency and urgency, gastrointestinal symptoms, and fatigue. In participants with UF, this study will prospectively assess changes in patient-reported quality of life and patient-reported effectiveness in controlling HMB when treated with elagolix, estradiol, and norethindrone acetate capsules; elagolix capsules (elagolix + E2/NETA). Around 200 adult premenopausal female participants in the United States with a diagnosis of HMB associated with UF and are prescribed elagolix + E2/NETA by their physicians as per standard of care will be enrolled in this direct-to-patient observational study for up to 6 months. Participants will have been prescribed elagolix + E2/NETA within the last 30 days prior to enrollment and will continue to take elagolix + E2/NETA throughout study participation. There may be a higher burden for participants in this study compared to standard of care. Electronic patient reported outcomes (ePROs) will be collected at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months to assess the impact of Elagolix + E2/NETA on patient-reported quality of life.
Iron deficiency anemia affects over half of girls and young women with heavy periods and is the most common cause of anemia worldwide. Most girls with heavy periods who also have iron deficiency anemia are prescribed iron to take by mouth every day by their doctor. There are some studies showing that taking iron every other day may actually help the iron be absorbed into the bloodstream better. This study is trying to compare how taking iron every other day compares to taking iron daily for treatment of anemia. The goal of this clinical research study is to learn which of the two methods of care will be the best way for girls and young women with iron deficiency anemia to take iron supplementation.
One of the AUB symptoms, heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), can lead to iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia and in acute and severe cases, can necessitate emergency medical care. This study's focus is on the symptom of HMB which has a number of benign causes. The investigative device, the IUB SEAD™, is a novel spherical endometrial ablation device developed to allow for simple, office-based chemical EA to treat benign causes of the symptom of HMB. The suggested procedure is expected to be simpler than the currently available EA methods and yet should still reduce the need for hysterectomy.
This is a prospective cohort study comparing the novel FDA-approved oral GnRH antagonist ORIAHNN (elagolix, estradiol, and norethindrone acetate capsules; elagolix capsules) to uterine artery embolization (UAE) or myomectomy (abdominal, laparoscopic, or hysteroscopic) for treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding due to leiomyomas. Uterine leiomyomas, also called fibroids, are hormone-dependent growths in the uterine muscle that are common in reproductive-age women (1). Leiomyomas can often lead to heavy menstrual bleeding. Definitive treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding due to leiomyomas is hysterectomy, but for patients who desire uterine conservation, a variety of treatment options exist. Regulation of menses with combined oral contraceptives or progestin only oral formulations are generally considered first line treatment but are not curative or effective for many patients. Another treatment option is a myomectomy, which is the surgical resection or removal of myomas. Myomectomy can be performed via hysteroscopy or laparoscopy, or by a vaginal or an abdominal approach. The route of removal depends on myoma location and patient symptoms. Another treatment option is Uterine fibroid or uterine artery embolization (UFE/UAE). UAE is a minimally invasive procedure where permanent particles are delivered to and block/embolize the blood supply to the myoma via a fluoroscopy directed arterial catheter. This typically leads to a decrease in fibroid size and associated bleeding (2). ORIAHNN, an oral GnRH antagonist that was FDA-approved in 2020, has demonstrated significant decrease in myoma-associated heavy menstrual bleeding compared to placebo (1) but has not been compared to other standard of care interventions. The primary objective of this study is to compare this novel medication to the common AUB-L treatments UAE and Myomectomy.
A randomized, placebo controlled, parallel group, double blind study to compare the 3-month adherence and efficacy of Active Iron in subjects with or at-risk of iron deficiency and a history of intolerance to oral iron. Subjects with intolerance and treatment failure due to oral iron (male and female subjects, aged 18 to 55 years, with mild to moderate iron deficiency, with or without anaemia) are eligible. Sixty subjects are randomised into three groups (14 mg elemental iron, 25mg elemental iron and 50mg elemental iron daily). The primary objective is to assess adherence/persistence (including using pill counts). Secondary objectives are to assess gastrointestinal tolerability, haematological efficacy and health related quality of life.
Prospective comparison of the incidence of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) in women of reproductive age treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
To determine if uterine cavity length on transabdominal pelvic ultrasound corresponds to uterine cavity length at time of IUD insertion. If transabdominal pelvic ultrasound is validated as a tool for measuring uterine cavity length, it can be used to guide physicians and subsequently patients in IUD insertion planning.
The study investigators are interested in learning more about how drugs, that are given to children by their health care provider, act in the bodies of children and young adults in hopes to find the most safe and effective dose for children. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the PK of understudied drugs currently being administered to children per SOC as prescribed by their treating provider.