View clinical trials related to Meningitis, Meningococcal.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to assess immunogenicity and safety of MenABCWY vaccine in healthy adolescents and adults aged 15 to 25 years previously vaccinated with MenACWY vaccine
This study is a randomized, double-blinded, and controlled phase III clinical trial of the Group A and C meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the vaccine in healthy infants aged 2-6 years.
This study is a randomized, double-blinded, and controlled phase III clinical trial of the Group A meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the vaccine in healthy infants aged 6-15 months.
While the initial evolution of meningococcal meningitis (MM) is well described, there are few data on the long-term evolution, beyond 1 year. The objective of this research is to evaluate the sequelae of MM beyond 1 year in patients with a history of MM followed in Paris area, France. Most children with MM in France have been included in the MM register and are still being followed. Parents will be offered a detailed clinical evaluation of their child including: a clinical and neurological examination, a cognitive performance assessment, an auditory, speech and visual assessment and an evaluation of the child's progress at school.
This study is part of a series of projects to improve protection against meningitis. Previously, researchers have given nose drops containing N. lactamica to over 400 volunteers and shown that many of them become colonised with N. lactamica without causing any illness or disease. This has previously been shown to prevent people from becoming colonised with N. meningitidis which can cause meningitis. This study aims to give nose drops containing N. lactamica to healthy adults in Mali, to see if they become safely colonised. In the future the study team would like to find out how N.lactamica helps children resist N.meningitidis, and develop new vaccines that exploit that mechanism.
As Covid 19 manifestations that have been recently described, inflammatory manifestation have major impact in infectious disease lesions. Some of them are delayed and provide Post infectious inflammatory reaction (PIIR), they are challenging for diagnosis and for management. Clinician have to avoid unnecessary antibiotic thearapy and in if necessary have to give immunosuppressive therapy. Except for rheumatic disease for group A streptococcus (GAS) infections there are not stanrdized diagnostic criteria and therapeutic protocol, and PIIR have probably a suboptimal management. In this context the investigators aim to explore PIIR in the 3 most frequent bacterial invasive infection in France, by a retrospective monocentric study. The investigators include all children betwwen 2012 and 2018 hospitalized for infections by Streptococcus pneumoniae (SP), Neisseria meningitidis (NM), and GAS invasive infections.
This is a phase IV, single-center, observer-blind, randomized, controlled vaccine trial in 2 to 10 years old healthy subjects. Each participant will receive a single intramuscular injection of one of the two vaccines either MPV ACYW® vaccine or Menactra ® vaccine according to the vaccine group assignment and will be followed up for one month for immunogenicity evaluation and for 6 months for safety evaluation. Statistical Hypothesis: H0: Seroconversion rate of test group is inferior to that of control group HA: Seroconversion rate of test group is non-inferior to that of control group Sample size calculation: the sample size was calculated based on non-inferiority test with alpha level of 0.025 and 80% power, assuming seroconversion rate in control group was 95% with non-inferiority margin at 10%. The sample size required for the study is 124 per arm. After adjusting for 5% drop-out, the final sample size required is 130 per arm.
This is a pilot study to assess the feasibility of establishing a national sero-epidemiological survey in England in individuals aged 0-24 years, focusing on assessing humoral immunity against diphtheria, Group C invasive meningococcus and SARS-CoV-2. The investigators will recruit 2800 to 3800 individuals, divided into three groups: Group one (N= 2300): This will include all age groups (0-24years), with recruitment restricted by postcodes provided by Public Health England (PHE) to recruit a representative population for the region as assessed by the IMD (Index of Multiple Deprivation scores). Group two (N= up to 1200): This group has been added following additional funding to enhance the sample size in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This will recruit 0-19 year olds and will not be restricted by post code sampling. Instead recruitment will be by public promotion within the normal recruiting regions for each site. Group three (N= up to 300): Addition of Group 3 which is enhanced surveillance in participants from Black, Asian or minority ethnic groups (BAME). Since the start of recruitment we have noted that only 11% of participants are from BAME population, despite recruiting in ethnically diverse regions. Given the increased risk of COVID-19 disease in the BAME community, this is a potential limitation of the study as it stands, not only because it may not reflect the diversity of the UK population, but because it does not allow assessment of whether the differing disease rates and seropositivity in adults are reflected in differences in seropositivity rates in children. Similarly to Group 2, this will recruit 0-19 year olds and will not be restricted by post code sampling.
This observer-blind, randomized, active controlled trial will be conducted among 2-29 year olds in two sites (Mali and The Gambia). The objectives of the study are to assess and compare the immunogenicity and safety of NmCV-5 with that of Menactra. A total of 1800 eligible participants (who or their parents/guardians have given written informed consent) will be randomised 2:1 (NmCV-5: Menactra) in each of the three age strata 18-29 years, 11-17 years & 2-10 years (400 NmCV-5 recipients & 200 Menactra recipients in each age strata). Each subject will receive a single dose of study vaccine and will be followed up for 6 months post vaccination during which solicited reactions (for seven days), unsolicited AEs (28 days) and SAEs (until the end of study i.e. 168 days after vaccination) will be collected. A blood sample will be collected at baseline (pre-vaccination) and at day 28 post-vaccination for immunogenicity assessment by a Serum Bactericidal Activity assay using rabbit complement (rSBA).
Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is a significant public health issue affecting nearly 14 million people in the United States. HPV can lead to cervical, oropharyngeal, anal, and penile cancers as well as genital warts.The purpose of this study is to test the comparative effectiveness of two interventions, AFIX only vs. AFIX + communication training, to increase Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates among adolescent patients in outpatient clinic settings. Providers and staff at four pediatric practices will be randomized to receive an in-person AFIX consultation or an AFIX consultation combined with communication training and commitment poster displays. Provider and parent data will be collected via a tablet computer RedCap survey. Additional practice and provider level HPV vaccination rates will be collected via patient de-identified claims data. The results of this study could contribute to the existing body of literature that suggests provider recommendations and routine vaccination assessments are key to increasing HPV vaccination uptake. This project has the potential to lead to the implementation and dissemination of low resource interventions to increase HPV vaccination rates among children and adolescents.