Outcome
Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
Other |
Analysis of Antibody Resistance: OR |
Clinical outcomes such as OR, duration of response, CB, PFS, and OS will be analyzed separately among subjects who were resistant to prior treatment with anti-CTLA-4 and/or anti-PD1/PD-L1 antibodies and those who lacked resistance in a subgroup analysis. This comparison is by necessity exploratory in nature and hypothesis generating. |
Up to 5 years |
|
Other |
Analysis of Antibody Resistance: Duration of Response |
Clinical outcomes such as OR, duration of response, CB, PFS, and OS will be analyzed separately among subjects who were resistant to prior treatment with anti-CTLA-4 and/or anti-PD1/PD-L1 antibodies and those who lacked resistance in a subgroup analysis. This comparison is by necessity exploratory in nature and hypothesis generating. |
Up to 5 years |
|
Other |
Analysis of Antibody Resistance: CB |
Clinical outcomes such as OR, duration of response, CB, PFS, and OS will be analyzed separately among subjects who were resistant to prior treatment with anti-CTLA-4 and/or anti-PD1/PD-L1 antibodies and those who lacked resistance in a subgroup analysis. This comparison is by necessity exploratory in nature and hypothesis generating. |
Up to 5 years |
|
Other |
Analysis of Antibody Resistance: PFS |
Clinical outcomes such as OR, duration of response, CB, PFS, and OS will be analyzed separately among subjects who were resistant to prior treatment with anti-CTLA-4 and/or anti-PD1/PD-L1 antibodies and those who lacked resistance in a subgroup analysis. This comparison is by necessity exploratory in nature and hypothesis generating. |
Up to 5 years |
|
Other |
Analysis of Antibody Resistance: OS |
Clinical outcomes such as OR, duration of response, CB, PFS, and OS will be analyzed separately among subjects who were resistant to prior treatment with anti-CTLA-4 and/or anti-PD1/PD-L1 antibodies and those who lacked resistance in a subgroup analysis. This comparison is by necessity exploratory in nature and hypothesis generating. |
Up to 5 years |
|
Other |
Analysis of GD2+ vs GD2- Patients: OR |
Clinical outcomes such as OR, duration of response, CB, PFS and OS and treatment associated selected biologic effects will be analyzed separately among patients who are GD2+ and those who are GD2- in a subgroup analysis. These outcome measures will be compared using two-sample t-test, log rank test and chi-square/Fisher's exact test between the two groups of patients who are GD2+ and who are GD2-. |
Up to 5 years |
|
Other |
Analysis of GD2+ vs GD2- Patients: Duration of Response |
Clinical outcomes such as OR, duration of response, CB, PFS and OS and treatment associated selected biologic effects will be analyzed separately among patients who are GD2+ and those who are GD2- in a subgroup analysis. These outcome measures will be compared using two-sample t-test, log rank test and chi-square/Fisher's exact test between the two groups of patients who are GD2+ and who are GD2-. |
Up to 5 years |
|
Other |
Analysis of GD2+ vs GD2- Patients: CB |
Clinical outcomes such as OR, duration of response, CB, PFS and OS and treatment associated selected biologic effects will be analyzed separately among patients who are GD2+ and those who are GD2- in a subgroup analysis. These outcome measures will be compared using two-sample t-test, log rank test and chi-square/Fisher's exact test between the two groups of patients who are GD2+ and who are GD2-. |
Up to 5 years |
|
Other |
Analysis of GD2+ vs GD2- Patients: PFS |
Clinical outcomes such as OR, duration of response, CB, PFS and OS and treatment associated selected biologic effects will be analyzed separately among patients who are GD2+ and those who are GD2- in a subgroup analysis. These outcome measures will be compared using two-sample t-test, log rank test and chi-square/Fisher's exact test between the two groups of patients who are GD2+ and who are GD2-. |
Up to 5 years |
|
Other |
Analysis of GD2+ vs GD2- Patients: OS |
Clinical outcomes such as OR, duration of response, CB, PFS and OS and treatment associated selected biologic effects will be analyzed separately among patients who are GD2+ and those who are GD2- in a subgroup analysis. These outcome measures will be compared using two-sample t-test, log rank test and chi-square/Fisher's exact test between the two groups of patients who are GD2+ and who are GD2-. |
Up to 5 years |
|
Other |
PD-L1 expression |
PD-L1 expression level will be compared between baseline and after initiation of treatment using linear mixed effects model after suitable transformation of PD-L1 expression level. Clinical outcomes such as OR, duration of response, CB, PFS and OS and treatment associated selected biologic effects will be analyzed separately among patients who are PDL1+ and those who are PD-L1- in a subgroup analysis. In addition, these outcome measures will be compared using two-sample t-test, log rank test and chi-square/Fisher's exact test between the two groups of patients who are PD-L1+ and who are PD-L1-. |
up to 5 years |
|
Primary |
Incidence of Adverse Events |
The number and severity of toxicity incidents per (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v 5.0 will be summarized with frequency and proportion. The 95% confidence interval for the proportion of subjects with severe complications (grade 3 or higher toxicities) will be constructed. |
up to 2 years |
|
Primary |
Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) |
The MTD is defined as the highest dose level at which less than 33% of the subjects experience a Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT). DLT will be defined as grade 3 or 4 toxicity that is possibly, probably or definitely related to IT-hu14.18-IL2 graded according to CTCAE v. 5.0. A standard 3+3 design and descriptive statistics will primarily be generated to summarize the data. |
up to 21 days |
|
Primary |
Maximum Administered Dose (MAD) |
The MAD is defined as the highest safely tolerated dose where less than 33% subjects experience a DLT but no higher dose level has been assessed. Descriptive statistics will primarily be generated to summarize the data. |
up to 21 days |
|
Secondary |
Objective Tumor Response (OR) |
OR will be summarized using descriptive statistics. Furthermore, a point estimate along with the 95% confidence interval for the proportion of subjects with OR will be provided. Clinical outcome of OR will be summarized by dose level for Phase IC. |
Up to 5 years |
|
Secondary |
Progression Free Survival (PFS) |
The length of time from the start of treatment until disease progression or death. Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate the survival distribution of progression-free survival for the Phase ID expansion cohort. |
Up to 5 years |
|
Secondary |
Overall Survival (OS) |
The length of time from the start of treatment until death from any cause. Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate the survival distribution of overall survival for the Phase ID expansion cohort. |
Up to 5 years |
|
Secondary |
Clinical Benefit (CB) |
The status of achieving complete response, partial response or stable disease in response to treatment. Clinical Benefit will be summarized using descriptive statistics. Furthermore, a point estimate along with the 95% confidence interval for the proportion of subjects with clinical benefit will be provided. |
Up to 5 years |
|
Secondary |
Duration of Response |
The length of time from documentation of tumor response until disease progression. Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate the survival distribution for the Phase ID expansion cohort. |
Up to 5 years |
|
Secondary |
Immunologic Parameters: Change in Antibody Dependent Cell-Mediated Toxicity (ADCC) Function |
Immunologic activation induced in vivo by intratumoral (IT)-hu14.18-IL2 fusion protein will be evaluated using both in vivo and in vitro analyses. Changes between assessment time points will be evaluated using a paired t-test or non-parametric Wilcoxon signed rank test, depending on the scale and distribution of the endpoint. |
Baseline, Cycle 3 day 1, Cycle 5 day 1, End of Treatment (up to 13 cycles) (cycles 1-4 are 21 days, 5+ are 28 days) |
|
Secondary |
Immunologic Parameters: Change in Natural Killer (NK) Cell Function |
Immunologic activation induced in vivo by intratumoral (IT)-hu14.18-IL2 fusion protein will be evaluated using both in vivo and in vitro analyses. Changes between assessment time points will be evaluated using a paired t-test or non-parametric Wilcoxon signed rank test, depending on the scale and distribution of the endpoint. |
Baseline, Cycle 3 day 1, Cycle 5 day 1, End of Treatment (up to 13 cycles) (cycles 1-4 are 21 days, 5+ are 28 days) |
|
Secondary |
Immunologic Parameters: Change in Soluble Interleukin-2 Receptor alpha (IL-2 alpha) Levels |
Immunologic activation induced in vivo by intratumoral (IT)-hu14.18-IL2 fusion protein will be evaluated using both in vivo and in vitro analyses. Changes between assessment time points will be evaluated using a paired t-test or non-parametric Wilcoxon signed rank test, depending on the scale and distribution of the endpoint. |
Baseline; Cycle 1 days 1,4,8; Cycle 4 days 1,4,8; Cycle 7 days 1,4,8; Cycle 10 day 1,4,8 (cycles 1-4 are 21 days, 5+ are 28 days) |
|
Secondary |
Histological Parameters: Change in Necrotic Tumor Cells from Baseline |
For the primary parameters to be assessed on the resected melanoma an objective scoring system will be established by a pathologist, grading each specimen with a score of 0, +, ++, +++. Changes in number of Necrotic Tumor Cells from baseline will be evaluated using a paired McNemar's test for binary outcomes. Quantitative assessment of necrosis of tumor cells will be measured and scored with a value ranging from 0% - 100% of tumor area. |
Baseline, Cycle 1, Cycle 2, Cycle 4 (cycles 1-4 are 21 days) |
|
Secondary |
Histological Parameters: Change in Apoptosis from Baseline |
For the primary parameters to be assessed on the resected melanoma an objective scoring system will be established by a pathologist, grading each specimen with a score of 0, +, ++, +++. |
Baseline, Cycle 1, Cycle 2, Cycle 4 (cycle length is 21 days) |
|
Secondary |
Histological Parameters: Change in Inflammatory Infiltrate in the tumor from Baseline |
For the primary parameters to be assessed on the resected melanoma an objective scoring system will be established by a pathologist, grading each specimen with a score of 0, +, ++, +++. |
Baseline, Cycle 1, Cycle 2, Cycle 4 (cycle length is 21 days) |
|
Secondary |
Histological Parameters: Change in Cellular Phenotype of Infiltrate |
Cellular phenotype of infiltrate within the tumor will be summarized by descriptive statistics. Changes from baseline will be evaluated using a paired McNemar's test for binary outcomes. |
Baseline, Cycle 1, Cycle 2, Cycle 4 (cycle length is 21 days) |
|
Secondary |
Histological Parameters: Change in hu14.18-IL2 in the tumor from Baseline |
Presence hu14.18-IL2 within the tumor will be summarized by descriptive statistics. Changes from baseline will be evaluated using a paired McNemar's test for binary outcomes. |
Baseline, Cycle 1, Cycle 2, Cycle 4 (cycle length is 21 days) |
|
Secondary |
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: alpha half-life |
Pharmacokinetic assessments will be performed on multiple serum specimens for each subject. The analysis of all PK parameters will be performed using the PK analysis population. The distribution half-life called alpha half-life (t1/2 alpha) will be summarized by dose level with simple summary statistics. |
At baseline, course 1 day 5, and day 5 of courses 2 & 4 (cycle length is 21 days) |
|
Secondary |
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: beta half-life |
Pharmacokinetic assessments will be performed on multiple serum specimens for each subject. The analysis of all PK parameters will be performed using the PK analysis population. The elimination half-life called beta half-life (t1/2 beta) will be summarized by dose level with simple summary statistics. |
At baseline, course 1 day 5, and day 5 of courses 2 & 4 (cycle length is 21 days) |
|
Secondary |
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Area Under the Curve (AUC) |
Pharmacokinetic assessments will be performed on multiple serum specimens for each subject. The analysis of all PK parameters will be performed using the PK analysis population. AUC will be summarized by dose level with simple summary statistics. |
At baseline, course 1 day 5, and day 5 of courses 2 & 4 (cycle length is 21 days) |
|
Secondary |
Pharmacokinetic Parameters: Clearance (CL) |
Pharmacokinetic assessments will be performed on multiple serum specimens for each subject. The analysis of all PK parameters will be performed using the PK analysis population. Clearance will be summarized by dose level with simple summary statistics. |
At baseline, course 1 day 5, and day 5 of courses 2 & 4 (cycle length is 21 days) |
|
Secondary |
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Relationship between Dose and AUC |
Scatterplots will be used to explore possible associations between the dose and area under the curve (AUC). The Jonckheere-Terpstra trend test will be performed to determine the significance of the association between increasing dose level and AUC. |
At baseline, course 1 day 5, and day 5 of courses 2 & 4 (cycle length is 21 days) |
|
Secondary |
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Relationship PK parameters and Toxicity |
Logistic regression analyses will be performed to correlate PK parameters with toxicity (grade >= 3 vs. grade 0-2) and response. |
At baseline, course 1 day 5, and day 5 of courses 2 & 4 (cycle length is 21 days) |
|