View clinical trials related to Marijuana Use.
Filter by:Though regulated cannabis sales are increasing, little is known about the individual health effects of cannabis regulation. Data from countries with a regulated market can be used to test the effect of regulation on the price of cannabis in the illicit market, and to explore its effect on social and health outcomes at the societal level, but strength of evidence for individual health and social outcomes is more limited because it must be aggregated on a state or country level. Data on individual and social outcomes should include baseline measurements before and outcome measurements after regulations changed. In this context, randomized-controlled trials are the least biased source of data on the effects of interventions. The SCRIPT study aims to investigate the individual health and social impact on recreational cannabis users who are allowed to purchase authorized, regulated cannabis from Swiss pharmacies compared to users who buy cannabis on the illicit market. Participants are randomly allocated in one of the two groups and followed-up for 6 months. After 6 months, all participants are allowed to participate in the intervention and the cohort is followed up for another 18 months. The intervention includes various offers: Participants can choose between cannabis sorts and delivery methods, and they are encouraged to shift from smoking cannabis to vaping cannabis-containing e-liquids, vaporizing cannabis blossoms or using oral cannabis. Vaping / vaporizing electronic devices are also recommended. At the same time, pharmacists offer opportunistic smoking cessation and problematic cannabis, alcohol use and further drug use counseling that conforms to motivational interviewing principles. The SCRIPT study adheres to rigorous quality criteria for the production and storage of regulated cannabis products. Only vaping / vaporizing electronic devices which are validated to reduce exposure to toxicants compared to cannabis smoking are recommended.
The goal of this interventional study is to determine the impact of high potency THC product use on cognitive function of young adults aged 21-25. The main question it aims to answer is: will cannabis users who switch to less potent THC products demonstrate improved cognitive function compared to baseline? Other questions this study aims to answer include: - Can researchers accurately assess THC consumption among frequent cannabis users? - Can researchers effectively incentivize cannabis users to use less potent THC products? - Do genetic variations in THC metabolism impact urinary THC excretion? - Do genetic variations in THC metabolism impact cognitive performance in cannabis users? - Are quantitative urinary THC values predictive of cognitive impairment? - How can researchers use research findings to inform harm reduction practices for people who use cannabis? Participants will submit blood and urine samples and be incentivized to use less potent THC products.
The goal of this treatment development project is to develop an adaptive ecological momentary intervention (a-EMI) for young adults using marijuana and alcohol that is grounded in self-regulation and social cognitive theories. To determine the most efficacious intervention strategies, the investigators will test variations of intervention components to identify the best combination. The study will take place at the Center for Integrated Health Care Research at Kaiser Permanente Hawaii (KPHI), located in Honolulu (island of Oahu). Following pilot testing with 6 participants, the study team will assess the feasibility and efficacy of intervention components on two primary outcomes (negative consequences and protective behavioral strategies [PBS]) using a fractional factorial experimental design, with post-intervention assessment and one- and three-month follow-ups. 136 diverse young adults recruited from KPHI who report current simultaneous alcohol and marijuana (SAM) use will be randomly assigned to one of eight groups, representing experimental conditions that include or do not include intervention strategies focused on craving reduction and PBS. As a result of this process, individual and/or combined components that lead to improved outcomes will be retained in a subsequent randomized controlled trial, while ineffective components will be eliminated.
The study is about helping teens who are involved in the court system to cut down or quit using marijuana. Teens may be asked to test out an experimental smartphone app, called TECH, that will be used only by teens in this study. This app is a private online community where teens can work towards changing their substance use and other behavior with the help of other anonymous teens. We will use this information to learn how the app may help teens make a change and to improve the TECH app.
The primary goals of this study are to examine 1) marijuana modulation of oxycodone self-administration and 2) oxycodone modulation of marijuana self-administration, under controlled conditions and across a range of doses for each drug.
The iSTART intervention is a 30-day substance prevention web-app whereby students complete five weekly interactive modules using a smart device or computer. Each module is approximately 15 minutes long, and focuses on a select substance: (i) alcohol, (ii) marijuana, (iii) nicotine, (iv) prescription drugs, and (v) illicit drugs. The modules are based on key theoretical constructs, behavior change strategies, and practical module components: attitudes (knowledge), perceived susceptibility (risk perceptions), subjective norms (normative re-education), and self-efficacy (refusal skills). This intervention will be evaluated via a time series design using a sample of 600 students randomly assigned to either the intervention, comparison, or control condition at a public institution in southern California.
The overarching goal of this online study is to compare the efficacy of six (weekly) sessions of Domain-Specific Episodic Future Thinking (DS-EFT) relative an active control condition on improving the ability to value future rewards and reducing cannabis use (grams and days of use), tobacco use, and alcohol use among.
With perinatal cannabis use rising in Canada, robust data on short-term and long-term effects on newborns are urgently needed. However, past barriers to obtain robust data included limited sample sizes, low self-reporting and no account of postpartum exposures. Therefore, this study will be conducted as a feasibility pilot study to tease out limitations that were present in previous studies. This study will help us dictate how to conduct a larger prospective cohort study to answer any knowledge gaps currently in the field of perinatal cannabis use.
Cannabis users who experienced a psychosis are particularly vulnerable to cannabis-related harms, which can include worse psychotic symptoms and more hospitalizations. Unfortunately, few psychosocial interventions exist that aim to decrease these harms. Instead, most focus on ceasing cannabis use which is rarely appealing to cannabis users. Furthermore, face-to-face psychotherapy often remains inaccessible to people with psychosis mostly due to lack of trained clinicians. Alternatives such as e-interventions have the potential to increase access to treatment and decrease clinicians' workload. Among cannabis harm reduction approaches are the protective behavioural strategies. These strategies do not encourage nor discourage cannabis use. Instead, they recommend behaviours for safer cannabis use. For example, these strategies include: 1) avoid driving a car under the influence of cannabis, 2) avoid mixing cannabis with other drugs and 3) purchase cannabis only from a trusted source. In the present pan-Canadian study, we will test the first e-intervention called CHAMPS (Cannabis Harm-reducing App for Managing Practices Safely) for cannabis harm reduction adapted for young adult cannabis users who experienced a psychosis. CHAMPS is a smartphone application that includes 17 strategies for safer cannabis use, a personalized consumption goal and a consumption journal. The goals of this study are 1) to confirm whether CHAMPS is acceptable to participants and 2) to test whether it works, notably by positively impacting participants' health and cannabis consumption habits.
Cannabis is a frequently-used psychoactive substance. While the majority of individuals can use cannabis without experiencing problems, a small minority of people develop cannabis problems. Despite the small-to-medium reported effect sizes of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and motivational enhancement therapy (MET) treatments for cannabis misuse, many cannabis users do not seek treatment. Online CBT/MET programs have the potential to be cost-effective and accessible, and offer a less stigmatizing option for treatment. These programs may also help capture cannabis users who experience subclinical problems, who are not captured by traditional treatment. Existing treatment programs also need to be adapted to maximize participant retention and increase treatment completion, as many current cannabis use treatment programs have significant drop-out rates. Hence, the goal of the proposed randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to examine the efficacy of an online evidence-based CBT/MET treatment program. Outcomes of a combined CBT/MET treatment program will be compared to a CBT-only treatment program and a waitlist control. This research will provide insight into the novel contribution of MET to online CBT treatment programs for cannabis misuse. The researchers are hoping to recruit 303 participants for this study from Central and Eastern Canada. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the treatment groups (i.e., CBT with MET, CBT without MET) or the psychoeducational control group. Individuals in either treatment group will be given 6 weeks to work through 8 online modules. Throughout the modules, participants will identify goals related to cannabis use, learn strategies to cope with cannabis cravings, triggers, and social pressures and learn to prevent relapse. Participants randomly assigned to the control (i.e., psychoeducation) will receive links to websites that provide general psychoeducation about cannabis use and wellbeing. All participants will complete online assessment measures at baseline, end of treatment, and at follow up approximately one month later (i.e., 0 weeks, 6 weeks, 10 weeks) in order to assess the efficacy of the treatment. At the end of the study, individuals in the control group will be given access to the CBT without MET treatment.