Effects of Modified Fixed Twin Block Versus Removable Twin Block on Skeletal Class 2 Growing Patients With Mandibular Deficiency

Malocclusion Clinical Trial

Official title:

Effects of Modified Fixed Twin Block Versus Removable Twin Block on Skeletal Class 2 Growing Patients With Mandibular Deficiency

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05993156
• Other study ID #: 3-3-23
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: December 1, 2022
• Est. completion date: October 30, 2023

Study information

• Verified date: August 2023
• Source: Cairo University
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Effects of modified fixed twin block versus removable twin block on skeletal class 2 growing patients with mandibular deficiency: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Description:

The main objective of the study is to evaluate the effects of the modified fixed TB on class 2 growing cases and to compare its effect to the conventional removable TB Research question Does the modified fixed twin block have the same effects as removable twin block during treatment of skeletal class 2 growing patients with mandibular deficiency? PICO P: Growing skeletal class 2 patients with deficient mandible I : Modified Fixed Twin block C: Conventional removable Twin block O : Primary outcome: Overjet Secondary outcome: Soft tissue Profile Antro-posterior mandibular position Mandibular length Antro-posterior maxillary position Upper and lower Incisors inclinations Durability of the appliance Patient Acceptance Hypothesis: There is no difference between the modified fixed or removable Twin block appliance regarding overjet reduction, dentoskeletal effects and patient perception. 8. Trial design: Randomized Clinical Trial Parallel group, two arm, equivalent trial with 1:1 allocation ratio.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 24
• Est. completion date: October 30, 2023
• Est. primary completion date: October 30, 2023
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Female
• Age group: 9 Years to 15 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Skeletal Class 2 malocclusion cases (ANB = 5 degrees)
• Overjet = 5 mm
• Growing patients (CVMS 3 or 4)

Exclusion Criteria:

• Skeletally mature patients 15 years old or above
• Patients with normal mandible and only protruded upper incisors.
• Syndromic, cleft patients and patients with dental anomalies
• Previous orthopaedic or orthodontic treatment
• No sex predilection.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Angle Class II
• Malocclusion
• Malocclusion, Angle Class II
• Mandible Small
• Micrognathism

Intervention

Device:
• modified Fixed twinblock
modified fixed twin block functional appliance, with cemented bands on the first molars
• removable twin block
Conventional Removable Clark twin block myofunctional appliance

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Egypt	Faculty of Dentistry	Cairo

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Cairo University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Egypt, 

References & Publications (12)

Alhammadi MS, Halboub E, Fayed MS, Labib A, El-Saaidi C. Global distribution of malocclusion traits: A systematic review. Dental Press J Orthod. 2018 Nov-Dec;23(6):40.e1-40.e10. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.23.6.40.e1-10.onl. Erratum In: Dental Press J Orthod. 2019 Aug 01;24(3):113. — View Citation

Burhan AS, Nawaya FR. Dentoskeletal effects of the Bite-Jumping Appliance and the Twin-Block Appliance in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2015 Jun;37(3):330-7. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cju052. Epub 2014 Oct 8. — View Citation

Caldwell S, Cook P. Predicting the outcome of twin block functional appliance treatment: a prospective study. Eur J Orthod. 1999 Oct;21(5):533-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/21.5.533. — View Citation

Clark William J., Mahony Derek, 2018. heal talk A journal of clinical dentistry 11.

Clark WJ. The twin block technique. A functional orthopedic appliance system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988 Jan;93(1):1-18. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(88)90188-6. No abstract available. — View Citation

Cozza P, Baccetti T, Franchi L, De Toffol L, McNamara JA Jr. Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 May;129(5):599.e1-12; discussion e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.010. — View Citation

Ehsani S, Nebbe B, Normando D, Lagravere MO, Flores-Mir C. Short-term treatment effects produced by the Twin-block appliance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2015 Apr;37(2):170-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cju030. Epub 2014 Jul 22. — View Citation

Elfeky HY, Fayed MS, Alhammadi MS, Soliman SAZ, El Boghdadi DM. Three-dimensional skeletal, dentoalveolar and temporomandibular joint changes produced by Twin Block functional appliance. J Orofac Orthop. 2018 Jul;79(4):245-258. doi: 10.1007/s00056-018-0137-1. Epub 2018 Apr 16. — View Citation

Linjawi AI, Abbassy MA. Dentoskeletal effects of the forsus fatigue resistance device in the treatment of class II malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthod Sci. 2018 Feb 15;7:5. doi: 10.4103/jos.JOS_80_17. eCollection 2018. — View Citation

Matthaios S, Tsolakis AI, Haidich AB, Galanis I, Tsolakis IA. Dental and Skeletal Effects of Herbst Appliance, Forsus Fatigue Resistance Device, and Class II Elastics-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 26;11(23):6995. doi: 10.3390/jcm11236995. — View Citation

O'Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Sanjie Y, Mandall N, Chadwick S, Connolly I, Cook P, Birnie D, Hammond M, Harradine N, Lewis D, McDade C, Mitchell L, Murray A, O'Neill J, Read M, Robinson S, Roberts-Harry D, Sandler J, Shaw I. Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 1: Dental and skeletal effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Sep;124(3):234-43; quiz 339. doi: 10.1016/S0889540603003524. — View Citation

Thiruvenkatachari B, Harrison JE, Worthington HV, O'Brien KD. Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 13;(11):CD003452. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003452.pub3. — View Citation

* Note: There are 12 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Over jet reduction	the horizontal distance between upper and lower incisors	9 months
Secondary	Effective mandibular length	distance from condylon to the Pogonion points	9 months
Secondary	lower incisor inclination	inclination of lower incisors on the mandibular plane	9 months