Assessment of Piezoelectric Periodontal Surgery Effects on Orthodontic Treatment: a Prospective Pilot Study

Malocclusion Clinical Trial

Official title:

Assessment of Piezoelectric Periodontal Surgery Effects on Orthodontic Treatment: a Prospective Pilot Study

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02359760
• Other study ID #: UMontreal
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• First received: February 4, 2015
• Last updated: October 24, 2017
• Start date: March 2015
• Est. completion date: April 2017

Study information

• Verified date: October 2017
• Source: Université de Montréal
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

INTRODUCTION: Dentoalveolar surgeries such as piezocision, have been developed with the aim to accelerate the tooth movement and therefore reduce the length of orthodontic treatment. Although this surgical technique seems to present several advantages, such as decreased risk of decalcification or orthodontic relapse, its use as a routine practice is not yet recommended. The main purpose of this study is to determine the duration of orthodontic treatment by using the piezocision. The secondary objectives are to evaluate the effect of this surgical technique on bone density, root resorption, osteoclast activity, inflammatory events and pain assessment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The investigators will conduct a prospective study. The experimental group will consist of 14 adults, subjects from 18 to 40 years-old (10 women, 4 men). The control group will consist of 30 matched patients, who have been already treated in the orthodontic clinic of the University of Montreal. The reliabilities of Intra and Inter assesors will be measured for each doctor. After completion of the surgical guides from CBCT, the Piezocision will be performed the same day of the bracket indirect placement. The surgical procedure will be standardized and did it by the same surgeon. The appointments will be every 2 weeks for 4 months, then every month. The investigators will make an assessment of pain by using a numerical visual scale, during the first 7 days after surgery. Analysis of inflammatory markers (IL-1) and osteoclast activity (RANKL, OPG) will be evaluated from the gingival sulcus fluid collected at day 0, 1, 3, 5, 8, 12, 16 and 24 weeks. At the end of the treatment, the overall quality evaluation of treatment using the "American Board of Orthodontics' grading system" would be realized by two blind external observers to limit bias.

Description:

EXPECTED RESULTS Orthodontic treatment accelerated by piézocicison will be completed within one year and will be 50% faster than a traditional treatment. The ratio benefit / risk of performing the piezocision will be acceptable for the patient and the orthodontist. We expect the following results: low pain, and absence of dental and periodontal deleterious effect (no root resorption, no tooth vitality loss and no bone loss). The same cohort can be used in future studies to assess the long term stability of the treatment.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 14
• Est. completion date: April 2017
• Est. primary completion date: January 2016
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 40 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• normal or low skeletal problem;

• dental relationchip without extraction;

• healthy;

• complete adult teeth;

• very cooperative;

• no plaque;

• no active periodontal disease and no bone loss visible radiographically;

• patient wishing a shorter orthodontic treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

• patient regularly taking analgesic and antidepressants.

• patients with alcool abuse problems.

• patient smoking more than 10 cigarettes per day.

• pregnant patient.

• allergy to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

• local or systemic Immunodeficiencies.

• uncontrolled systemic disease (For exaemple diabetes, cardiovascular disease).

• coagulation problems or taking anti-coagulants.

• presence of oral infections and periodontal disease uncontrolled active.

• taking intravenous bisphosphonates or taking oral bisphosphonates for more than 4 years.

• taking a long-term corticosteroids.

• antibiotic necessary before any surgery and taking antibiotics within 6 months before surgery

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Malocclusion

Intervention

Procedure:
• Piezocision
Flapless corticotomies

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Canada	University of Montreal, orthodontic department	Montreal	Quebec

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Université de Montréal

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

References & Publications (13)

Brugnami F, Caiazzo A, Dibart S. Lingual orthodontics: accelerated realignment of the "social six" with piezocision. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013 Sep;34(8):608-10. — View Citation

Dibart S, Sebaoun JD, Surmenian J. Piezocision: a minimally invasive, periodontally accelerated orthodontic tooth movement procedure. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2009 Jul-Aug;30(6):342-4, 346, 348-50. — View Citation

Dibart S, Surmenian J, Sebaoun JD, Montesani L. Rapid treatment of Class II malocclusion with piezocision: two case reports. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010 Oct;30(5):487-93. — View Citation

Dibart S, Yee C, Surmenian J, Sebaoun JD, Baloul S, Goguet-Surmenian E, Kantarci A. Tissue response during Piezocision-assisted tooth movement: a histological study in rats. Eur J Orthod. 2014 Aug;36(4):457-64. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjt079. Epub 2013 Nov 19. — View Citation

Keser EI, Dibart S. Piezocision-assisted Invisalign treatment. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2011 Mar;32(2):46-8, 50-1. — View Citation

Keser EI, Dibart S. Sequential piezocision: a novel approach to accelerated orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Dec;144(6):879-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.12.014. — View Citation

Long H, Pyakurel U, Wang Y, Liao L, Zhou Y, Lai W. Interventions for accelerating orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2013 Jan;83(1):164-71. doi: 10.2319/031512-224.1. Epub 2012 Jun 21. Review. — View Citation

Mathews DP, Kokich VG. Accelerating tooth movement: the case against corticotomy-induced orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Jul;144(1):5-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.008. — View Citation

Milano F, Dibart S, Montesani L, Guerra L. Computer-guided surgery using the piezocision technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014 Jul-Aug;34(4):523-9. doi: 10.11607/prd.1741. — View Citation

Sebaoun JD, Surmenian J, Dibart S. [Accelerated orthodontic treatment with piezocision: a mini-invasive alternative to conventional corticotomies]. Orthod Fr. 2011 Dec;82(4):311-9. doi: 10.1051/orthodfr/2011142. Epub 2011 Nov 23. French. — View Citation

Strippoli J, Aknin JJ. [Accelerated tooth movement by alveolar corticotomy or piezocision]. Orthod Fr. 2012 Jun;83(2):155-64. doi: 10.1051/orthodfr/2012015. Epub 2012 Jun 21. French. — View Citation

Vercellotti T, Podesta A. Orthodontic microsurgery: a new surgically guided technique for dental movement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007 Aug;27(4):325-31. — View Citation

Yamaguchi M. RANK/RANKL/OPG during orthodontic tooth movement. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2009 May;12(2):113-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2009.01444.x. Review. — View Citation

* Note: There are 13 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Determine the duration of orthodontic treatment associated with Piezocision	Assessment of the length of orthodontic treatment following piezocision	18 months
Secondary	Compare the duration of treatment with the control group	Compare the duration of treatment to the control group already processed and matched by sex, age, type of malocclusion, orthodontic biomechanics to limit bias.	18 months
Secondary	Assess the overall quality of treatment (American Board of Orthodontics' grading system)	At the end of the treatment, the overall quality evaluation of treatment using the "American Board of Orthodontics' grading system" would be realized by two blind external observers to limit bias.	18 months
Secondary	Assessment of pain during treatment (numerical visual scale)	Assessment of pain by Visual Digital Scale during treatment	Every days after the surgery durin 7 days and one day after every appointment
Secondary	Evaluation of osteoclastic activity (analysis of RANKL and OPG markers by sampling in the gingival fluid with sterile paper points)	Osteoclastic activity measurement by analysis of RANKL and OPG markers by sampling in the gingival fluid with sterile paper points	weeks 0, 1, 3, 5, 8, 12, 16, 24
Secondary	Evaluation of inflammatory markers (quantification of interleukin-1 (IL-1))	Measurement of inflammatory markers in the gingival fluid with the quantification of interleukin-1 (IL-1)	weeks 0, 1, 3, 5, 8, 12, 16, 24
Secondary	Evaluate changes in density and bone volume with the cone beam computed tomography or Cone Beam Computerized Tomography (CBCT)	Evaluate changes in density and bone volume with the cone beam computed tomography or Cone Beam Computerized Tomography (CBCT)	18 months
Secondary	Evaluate root resorption with the Cone Beam Computerized Tomography (CBCT)	Evaluation of root resorption using CBCT	18 months
Secondary	Evaluate the inflammatory and remodelling gene expression	Evaluation of the gene expression associated with inflammation following piezocision	0 and 8 weeks