View clinical trials related to Malocclusion.
Filter by:Research questions: 1. Will the panoramic images derived from cone beam CT data give better diagnostic ability than conventional panoramic radiographs? 2. Will 3D cephalometric analysis offer the orthodontists and surgeons better information for treatment planning? 3. Will the 3D cephalometric analysis give more accurate treatment plan and better treatment outcome? General hypothesis and special aims Overall aims: - To compare 2D versus 3D cephalometric analysis: treatment planning and therapeutic outcome. - To determine the accuracy and diagnostic ability and usability of the 3D cephalometric analysis. - To evaluate the diagnostic ability and usability of the panoramic image derived from cone beam CT data as compared to 2D panoramic images. - To evaluate the value of the cone beam CT data in cephalometric analysing process for orthodontic and maxillofacial surgery treatment. Hypotheses: 1. The availability of the 3D cephalometric analysis influences the orthodontic and maxillofacial treatment plan and decision, and might change the treatment outcome. 2. Panoramic images derived from cone beam CT data may provide equal information for diagnosis as conventional panoramic images. 3. Cone beam CT will be able to replace "classic orthodontic imaging" being more time and dose efficient and having a beneficial effect on treatment outcome.
Enlarged tonsils and malocclusion have relationship with sleep disturbance in children. The consequences of these features can include deviation of normal craniofacial growth such that this may result in a facial morphology more suitable to the development of sleep apnea later in life. The aim of this study was to compare the growth redirection, the evolution of respiratory symptoms and the pharyngeal size of snoring children with obstructive tonsils from the waiting list for surgery treated with the Bioajusta X orthodontic appliance.This new protocol of orthodontic treatment promotes maxillary expansion, mandibular advancement and proper tongue positioning on swallowing , that together may be helpful on remodeling the upper airways.
Research problem: Anchorage reinforcement is effective with headgear provided patient compliance is optimal. Nance palatal arch have also been shown to be effective. Microscrews despite their popularity however have no scientific evidence to support their use. Aim: To compare the effectiveness of 3 methods of anchorage reinforcement 1) headgear 2) Nance palatal arch 3) orthodontic micro-screws. Hypothesis: There is no difference in the amount of anchorage loss between the three methods of anchorage reinforcement. Design: Randomized clinical trial. Setting: District General Hospital orthodontic department Participants: 78 patients requiring "absolute anchorage". Interventions: The subjects will be randomized into 3 groups. In group 1 headgear will be requested 12-14 hours per day. In group 2 a nance palatal arch will be placed for use as intra oral anchorage reinforcement. In group 3, orthodontic micro-screws will be used for anchorage. Method of investigation: The study will be of 78 'absolute anchorage' patients older than 12 years randomly assigned to one of three groups of anchorage reinforcement Outcome measures: 1. Anchorage loss measured from lateral Cephalometric radiographs and 3-D model scanning, records will be taken at three points 2. Patient perception of the different treatment methods, including surgical experience Data analysis: The data will be analysed on an intention to treat basis. Basic descriptive statistics and uni-variate tests will initially be done to explore the data. Final data analysis will involve the relevant multi-variate statistical modeling. Dissemination: Conference proceedings, journal papers and the Cochrane oral health group.
To gather data indicating whether or not the OrthoAccel device speeds tooth movement in people who use orthodontics (braces).
This investigation aims at distinguishing the subjects that react in a favorable way to the treatment protocol we propose for the Class II treatment
To test whether levels of OPG can be changed during orthodontic treatment. Alveolar bone samples will be collected from partially impacted third molars after orthodontic uprighting for different period of time in volunteers. In situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry analysis for OPG and RANKL will reveal their roles in this physiological process.
Orthodontic treatment requires application of force systems to individual teeth or groups of teeth, which results in a cellular response with periodontal ligament (PDL) and alveolar bone remodeling. The forces applied must be of sufficient magnitude and duration to exceed the normal physiologic threshold associated with daily oral function. Excessive force levels will result in areas of tissue necrosis with delayed tooth movement and increased risk of root resorption. Although orthodontic tooth movement is achieved in a large segment of the population, the optimum force level has not been defined. The optimum force for tooth movement depends on individual root geometry as well as biologic characteristics of surrounding tissue including bone density, periodontal thickness, and fluid dynamics. Because experimental and clinical techniques are generally limited to known complex force systems, biomechanical modeling has become a necessity. Such models must be validated with well-controlled clinical studies that evaluate orthodontic tooth movement over an extended distance. The ultimate goal would be development of a computer simulation model to predict tooth movement in the clinical setting. The primary objective of this study is to test controlled clinical data with a biomechanical model of the tooth and supporting tissues for distal movement of the human maxillary canine tooth (of known root geometry) in response to various 3D force systems that produce different levels of stress in the supporting tissues. Secondary objectives include evaluation of rate of bodily tooth canine movement with two known compressive stress levels (13 and 22 kPa), evaluation of three different reference systems to measure rate of tooth movement, and evaluation of an implant placed in the roof of the mouth (palatal implant) for orthodontic anchorage in adolescent patients. The rate of translation (bodily) tooth movement of the maxillary canine tooth will be significantly greater with 22kPa compared to 13kPa compressive stress applied to the periodontal ligament, and this difference can be predicted by appropriate mathematical/numerical models of the tooth and supporting tissues.