Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Together with the increased adult patient demand for orthodontic treatment and the push toward increasingly personalized treatment, technology developments have resulted in a growing worldwide demand for clear aligners, to the point that they are now an essential part of any orthodontic practice. Despite the widespread use of the technique, the existing literature about reliability of orthodontic tooth movement with Invisalign aligners seems not encouraging. Several papers have demonstrated that what is virtually planned is not what is clinically achievable. However, it should be considered that clear aligner orthodontics techniques are customized not only for the patients but for orthodontists too. Therefore, virtual treatment plan design, in terms of attachments' design and placement, orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) staging and aligner deformation overengineering, or in other words aligners biomechanics knowledge, plays a crucial role in defining the quality of the orthodontic treatment with Invisalign aligners. Based on these considerations the present study was designed to answer two research-clinical questions: 1) which are the less predictable orthodontic movements with Invisalign aligners when the treatment plan is designed by expert operators? and 2) which is the impact of the orthodontist experience, in terms of patient motivation, on the predictability of orthodontic tooth movement with Invisalign aligners? To answer those questions, the predictability of OTM in a sample of Invisalign patients treated by expert operators was compared with the predictability of OTM in a sample treated by post-graduate students. The null hypothesis for question 1 is that all the prescribed orthodontic tooth movements are predictable, while the null hypothesis for question 2 is that the reliability of orthodontic tooth movement is not affected by operator experience. 98 patients (31 M, 67 F; mean age 28 ± 12 years) were selected among those in treatment at the Department of Orthodontics of the University of Turin, which is the coordinating center, and at 5 private orthodontics offices across Italy. The inclusion criteria for practitioners were as follows: orthodontist with huge and renewed experience in Invisalign treatments; has the ability to scan plaster model or to collect intraoral scans and upload (via internet) the files obtained to a central repository; affirms that the practice can devote sufficient time in patient scheduling to allow focused recording of all data required for the study; and does not anticipate retiring, selling the practice, or moving during the study. Signed, written informed consent was required before inclusion in the trial. All participants included in this prospective observational study had Class I or mild Class II malocclusion with mild to moderate crowding or spacing in the maxillary and mandibular dental arches (nonextraction cases). Interproximal enamel reduction was performed as prescribed in each patient's virtual treatment plan. The average treatment time was 10 ± 5 months. The sample considered a total of 2716 teeth that were analyzed overlapping the real post-treatment .stl file obtained with the final intra-oral scan to the planned post-treatment .stl file obtained exporting the final stage of the virtual setup. Every virtual treatment plan was designed by orthodontists with a huge and renewed experience in Invisalign treatments. While in the private practices the treatment was directly conducted by 5 expert orthodontist (mean age 45.6 ± 8.2) who controlled the patient at every appointment, in the University setting the treatment was conducted by 5 post-graduate students at the last year of their program (mean age 26.4± 1.4). Control appointments were fixed at 6 weeks interval in both the University and the private settings. Posttreatment digital models and final virtual treatment plan models were exported from ClinCheck® software as stereolithography files and subsequently imported into Geomagic Qualify software (3D Systems(r), Rock Hill, South Carolina, USA), in order to compare individual tooth positions between digital models of each patient. The dental arches were superimposed using the landmark-based method and the surface-based method (Best Fit Alignment). So that the differences between the tooth positions could be calculated, 3 reference planes were identified on the virtual treatment plan model. Differences between the actual treatment outcome and the predicted outcome were calculated and tested for statistical significance for each tooth in the mesial-distal, vestibular-lingual, and occlusal-gingival directions, as well as for angulation, inclination, and rotation. Differences greater than 0.5 mm for linear measurements and 2° for angular measurements were considered clinically significant. In addition, the statistical significance of categorical variables was tested for each previously calculated difference in tooth movement.


Clinical Trial Description

n/a


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT05356780
Study type Observational
Source University of Turin, Italy
Contact
Status Completed
Phase
Start date October 12, 2019
Completion date January 31, 2022

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT02914431 - Personalized Titanium Plates vs CAD/CAM Surgical Splints in Maxillary Repositioning of Orthognathic Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT05383820 - Effect of Paracetamol and Ketorolac on RANK-L Levels in Patients Starting Orthodontic Treatment Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT03794726 - Comparison of Orthodontic Molar Protraction With and Without Adjunctive Surgery N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03513003 - The Use of a Pacifier to Correct Malocclusions in Young Children N/A
Completed NCT02603289 - One Week Aligner Evaluation
Terminated NCT01210547 - Three-dimensional Assessment of Craniofacial Structures N/A
Completed NCT01463839 - Sleep Disorder and Oral Habits in Children N/A
Recruiting NCT04946201 - Premolar Extractions for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Children With Overjet
Recruiting NCT04117360 - Orthognathic Speech Pathology: Phonetic Contrasts of Patients With Dental Discrepancies Pre- and Post-Treatment Analyses
Active, not recruiting NCT06291129 - Gingival Health and Malocclusion Among Type 1 Diabetic Children and Adolescents N/A
Recruiting NCT05684510 - Treatment of Mild Class II Malocclusion in Adult Patients With Clear Aligners Versus Fixed Multibracket Therapy N/A
Completed NCT02659813 - Orthodontic Archwire Effectiveness Trial N/A
Completed NCT02427763 - Microbiological and Epithelial Evaluation Related to the Use of Orthodontic Thermoplastic Device Phase 0
Completed NCT01962012 - Effect of AcceleDent® Aura on Orthodontic Tooth Movement With Aligners Phase 4
Completed NCT02267811 - The Effect of OrthoPulseā„¢ on the Rate of Orthodontic Tooth Movement N/A
Completed NCT03405961 - A Comparison of Conventional Versus Digital PAR (Peer Assessment Rating) Scores Using an Intraoral Scanner
Recruiting NCT06218641 - Discomfort Perceived by a Cohort of Patients Treated With Aligners and Attachments Placed According to Two Different Protocols N/A
Completed NCT05711160 - Comparison of the Accuracy and Reliability of Measurements Made on CBCT and IOS Images With Their made-on Plaster Models.
Recruiting NCT06140043 - Augmented Reality for Orthognatic Surgery Patient Education Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05573308 - Optimizing Orthodontic Appliances Efficiency With Remote Dental Monitoring and Artificial Intelligence Algorithms N/A