View clinical trials related to Malaria, Vivax.
Filter by:Health care facility based, randomized, controlled, open label, superiority trial with 3 arms
Plasmodium vivax malaria is difficult to manage because even after taking medicine that kills the infection in the blood, it can continue to hide quietly in the liver, later re-emerging into the blood and causing another episode of malaria illness (relapse). This clinical trial aims to enroll patient with P. vivax infections and try to detect signals in blood, urine and/or saliva coming from the silent liver stages to help identify who could benefit from treatment with primaquine. It also will explore if certain factors of patients negatively impact primaquine efficacy.
This is an Open label, first-in-human, Phase I/IIa, blood-stage P. vivax malaria vaccine trial to assess the safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of the blood-stage Plasmodium vivax malaria vaccine candidate PvDBPII in Matrix M1 in healthy adults living in the UK.
This study is a human challenge study to assess the feasibility and safety of controlled human malaria infection (via P. vivax sporozites) in healthy volunteers, and to develop a bank of P. vivax-infected blood for use in future controlled human P. vivax malaria infection studies. Additional objectives are to obtain data on host immune response to P. vivax infection and pre-treatment gametocytaemia. This study is funded by the UK Wellcome Trust. The grant reference number are Oxford/MORU: 212336/Z/18/Z and 212336/Z/18/A, and Mahidol University: 212336/A/18/Z and 212336/A/18/A.
Both artemether-lumefantrine and chloroquine are currently used and recommended by Malaysian Ministry of Health as blood stage treatments for non-severe P. vivax and P. knowlesi malaria. Microscopic misdiagnosis between Plasmodium species remains a large issue in Sabah, Malaysia and elsewhere. In order to facilitate potential policy change to a unified ACT guideline for all malaria species in Sabah artemether-lumefantrine needs to be evaluated for P. vivax malaria. Preliminary data in a recently completed RCT evaluating artesunate-mefloquine vs chloroquine for P. vivax showed up to 36% P. vivax recurrence with chloroquine monotherapy by day 28 post treatment without primaquine. Based on these data blood stage chloroquine treatment failure rates should also be evaluated in the context of standard concurrent (rather than delayed) liver stage primaquine dosing, due to both its potential blood stage synergistic effect in addition to known decreased recurrence rates. As artemether-lumefantrine is one of the current first line Ministry of Health ACTs used in Sabah with a lower adverse event profile compared to artesunate-mefloquine, this was recommended as the more appropriate ACT to evaluate against chloroquine.
This research is intended to study the efficacy of CQ alone for P.vivax infection and also to study the recurrence rate among patients with P.vivax on standard dose of CQ and PQ. For this study, PQ will be withheld for 28 days so as to study the efficacy of CQ alone since masking effect over one another was found when CQ is given with PQ. So the investigators are not sure whether the recurrence is due to resistance to CQ or CQ concentration in blood is below therapeutic level or it is due to PQ is in inadequate dose. From this study the investigators will get findings like may be CQ is still working for P.vivax or no longer working for P.vivax due to resistance developed by P.vivax parasites. So for P.vivax which is not responding to CQ therapy, the investigators will go for second line treatment with ACT in a similar fashion as it is given for P. falciparum infection in Bhutan. And if the investigators find CQ is still working for P.vivax infection, the next level of study will be to compare higher dose of PQ with standard dose of PQ ( as practiced now) in lieu of bringing down the relapse rates in P. vivax infection.
In Thailand, the proportion of P.vivax infection has now been increasing and is equal to Plasmodium falciparum since 1998. The incidence of P.vivax has recently been reported as 20 per 1000 population per year. Unlike Plasmodium falciparum, P.vivax infection rarely develops into complicated malaria and death is unusual. However, P.vivax has a dormant stage (the hypnozoite) that persists in the human liver and may cause relapse weeks, months, or even years later. Therefore, P.vivax infection is considered to have greater impact on morbidity than mortality, resulting in significant social and economic burden. Moreover, it is very difficult to control P.vivax transmission, because gametocytes appear almost simultaneously with schizonts. Radical treatment of the infection, therefore, normally consists of a blood schizontocidal course of chloroquine and a course primaquine for the elimination of the hypnozoites as anti-relapse therapy. In Thailand, chloroquine and primaquine have remained the mainstay chemotherapeutics for the treatment of P.vivax for more than 60 years and resistance has not yet been reported . The relapse rates at day 28 are about 50% without primaquine therapy and about 20% with standard primaquine therapy. Relapse has not been observed among patients receiving high dose primaquine therapy (30 mg daily for 14 days). Since January 2007, the evidence of reduced susceptibility of Plasmodium falciparum to artemisinins in Western Cambodia at Thai-Cambodia border was first presented and confirmed in a subsequent detailed pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic study. Nevertheless, a trend of gradual decline of in vitro sensitivity to chloroquine has been documented in some areas of the country, particularly Thai-Myanmar border. There has been no clinical-parasitological evidence of chloroquine resistant P.vivax in Thai-Cambodia border, Thailand. The objectives of the present study are to assess in vivo efficacy of first line regimen of chloroquine given with primaquine, and in vitro susceptibility of P.vivax isolates in areas along Thai-Cambodia border, Thailand.