Macular Edema Clinical Trial
— POINTOfficial title:
PeriOcular and INTravitreal Corticosteroids for Uveitic Macular Edema Trial
Verified date | May 2018 |
Source | JHSPH Center for Clinical Trials |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
To evaluate the relative efficacy of three commonly utilized regional corticosteroids for the
regional treatment of uveitic macular edema: periocular triamcinolone acetonide; intravitreal
triamcinolone acetonide; intravitreal dexamethasone implant. The primary efficacy measure
will be percent change in central subfield thickness as measured by OCT at 8 weeks.
Participants will continue in the study for 24 weeks in order to evaluate relative effects of
the 3 treatment strategies on the duration of treatment effects, requirement for additional
injections, and adverse effects.
Note: The planned sample size for the POINT Trial was 267 subjects. On 17 July 2017, with 192
subjects enrolled, the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC) reviewed the planned
interim analysis and recommended that the goals of the trial could be accomplished by
completing follow-up of enrolled subjects without the recruitment of additional subjects. Per
the DSMC recommendations, recruitment was suspended and follow-up of enrolled subjects was
completed according to the protocol.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 192 |
Est. completion date | January 4, 2018 |
Est. primary completion date | August 30, 2017 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: Eye level inclusion criteria - at least one eye must meet all of the following conditions: - Non-infectious anterior, intermediate, posterior or panuveitis; either active or inactive uveitis is acceptable; - Macular edema (ME) defined as the presence of central subfield macular thickness greater than the normal range for the OCT machine being used, regardless of the presence of cysts, as assessed by study ophthalmologist; - Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) 5/200 or better; - Baseline intraocular pressure > 5 mm Hg and = 21 mm Hg (current use of 3 or fewer intraocular pressure-lowering medications and/or prior glaucoma surgery are acceptable); - Baseline fluorescein angiogram that is gradable for leakage in the central subfield - Pupillary dilation sufficient to allow OCT testing. Exclusion Criteria: Patient level exclusion criteria: -History of infectious uveitis, or of scleritis, keratitis, or infectious endophthalmitis in either eye; History of central serous retinopathy in either eye; - For women of childbearing potential: pregnancy, breastfeeding, or a positive pregnancy test; unwilling to practice an adequate birth control method (abstinence, combination barrier and spermicide, or hormonal) for duration of trial; - Use of oral acetazolamide or other systemic carbonic anhydrase inhibitor at baseline; - Oral prednisone dose > 10 mg per day (or of an alternative corticosteroid at a dose higher than that equipotent to prednisone 10 mg per day) OR oral prednisone dose = 10 mg per day that has not been stable for at least 4 weeks(note that if patient is off of oral prednisone at baseline (P01 visit), dose stability requirement for past 4 weeks does not apply); - Systemic immunosuppressive drug therapy that has not been stable for at least 4 weeks; - Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any component of the study drugs; Eye level exclusion criteria - at least one eye that meets all inclusion criteria cannot have any of the following conditions: - History of severe glaucoma as defined by optic nerve damage (cup/disc ratio of = 0.9 or any notching of optic nerve to the rim); - Media opacity causing inability to assess fundus or perform OCT; - Presence of an epiretinal membrane noted clinically or by OCT that per the judgment of study ophthalmologist may be significant enough to limit improvement of ME (i.e., causing substantial wrinkling of the retinal surface)81; - Torn or ruptured posterior lens capsule; - Presence of silicone oil; - Periocular or intravitreal corticosteroid injection in past 8 weeks; - Injection of dexamethasone intravitreal implant in past 12 weeks; - Placement of fluocinolone acetonide implant (Retisert) in past 3 years; |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Australia | Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital | East Melbourne | |
Canada | McGill University | Montreal | Quebec |
United Kingdom | Moorfields Eye Hospital | London | |
United States | Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan | Ann Arbor | Michigan |
United States | Emory University | Atlanta | Georgia |
United States | Johns Hopkins University | Baltimore | Maryland |
United States | National Eye Institute, NIH | Bethesda | Maryland |
United States | Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary | Boston | Massachusetts |
United States | Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston | Boston | Massachusetts |
United States | Northwestern University | Chicago | Illinois |
United States | Rush University Medical Center | Chicago | Illinois |
United States | Duke Eye Center, Duke University | Durham | North Carolina |
United States | Vitreoretinal Consultants | Houston | Texas |
United States | University of Iowa | Iowa City | Iowa |
United States | Jules Stein Eye Institute, UCLA | Los Angeles | California |
United States | Anne Bates Leach Eye Hospital, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine | Miami | Florida |
United States | New York Eye and Ear Infirmary | New York | New York |
United States | Scheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania |
United States | Wills Eye Hospital | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania |
United States | Unniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania |
United States | MAYO Clinic | Rochester | Minnesota |
United States | Washington University School of Medicine | Saint Louis | Missouri |
United States | John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah | Salt Lake City | Utah |
United States | University of California, San Francisco | San Francisco | California |
United States | University of Washington | Seattle | Washington |
United States | University of South Florida | Tampa | Florida |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
JHSPH Center for Clinical Trials | National Eye Institute (NEI) |
United States, Australia, Canada, United Kingdom,
Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment Trial Research Group; Writing Committee:, Thorne JE, Sugar EA, Holbrook JT, Burke AE, Altaweel MM, Vitale AT, Acharya NR, Kempen JH, Jabs DA. Periocular Triamcinolone vs. Intravitreal Triamcinolone vs. Intravitreal De — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Proportion of Baseline Central Subfield Thickness Observed at 8 Weeks | The primary outcome is the change in central subfield thickness from baseline to 8 weeks measured on a relative scale as the the proportion of the baseline central subfield thickness. Values less than 1 indicate a decrease in retinal thickness with lower values indicating greater decreases. Smaller values are better. The time point of 8 weeks was chosen for assessment of the primary outcome because it encompasses the window for maximum benefit for all three treatment strategies. Retinal thickness was evaluated using masked assessments of OCT images. |
At baseline and 8 weeks | |
Secondary | Proportion of Baseline Central Subfield Thickness Observed at 24 Weeks | The primary outcome is the change in central subfield thickness from baseline to 24 weeks measured on a relative scale as the the proportion of the baseline central subfield thickness. Values less than 1 indicate a decrease in retinal thickness with lower values indicating greater decreases. Smaller values are better.The time point of 24 weeks was chosen to evaluate the duration of response and the need for additional injections.Retinal thickness was evaluated using masked assessments of OCT images. | At baseline and the 24 week visit | |
Secondary | Proportion of Eyes With >= 20% Reduction in Macular Thickness (or Normalization Even if <20% Reduction) at 8 Weeks | Proportion of eyes with >=20% reduction in macular thickness (or normalization of macular thickness even if there is <20% reduction) at 8 weeks. | Over 8 weeks of follow-up | |
Secondary | Proportion of Eyes With >= 20% Reduction in Macular Thickness (or Normalization Even if <20% Reduction) at 24 Weeks | Proportion of eyes with >=20% reduction in macular thickness (or normalization of macular thickness even if there is <20% reduction) at 24 weeks | Over 24 weeks of follow-up | |
Secondary | Proportion of Eyes With Resolution of Macular Edema at 8 Weeks | Proportion of eyes with resolution of macular edema defined as normalization of the macular thickness (i.e., < 260 um on the standardized scale) at 8 weeks. The greater the proportion the more eyes achieved resolution of macular edema. | Over 8 weeks of follow-up | |
Secondary | Proportion of Eyes With Resolution of Macular Edema at 24 Weeks | Proportion of eyes with resolution of macular edema defined as normalization of the macular thickness (i.e., <260 um on the standard scale) at 24 weeks. | Over 24 weeks of follow-up | |
Secondary | Change in Best-corrected Visual Acuity at 8 Weeks | Mean change in best-corrected visual acuity from baseline to 8 weeks. Participants' visual acuity was measured by certified examiners with best refractive correction in place.Participants were challenged with reading letters on lines of the standard ETDRS eye chart (5 letters per line). Lines became smaller as participants progressed from the top to the bottom of the chart. Participants read down the chart until no more meaningful readings could be made and were scored by how many letters could be correctly identified. More letters read is associated with higher visual acuity. | Over 8 weeks of follow-up | |
Secondary | Change in Best-corrected Visual Acuity at 24 Weeks | Mean change in best-corrected visual acuity from baseline to 24 weeks. Participants' visual acuity was measured by certified examiners with best refractive correction in place.Participants were challenged with reading letters on lines of the standard ETDRS eye chart (5 letters per line). Lines became smaller as participants progressed from the top to the bottom of the chart. Participants read down the chart until no more meaningful readings could be made and were scored by how many letters could be correctly identified. More letters read is associated with higher visual acuity. | Over 24 weeks of follow-up | |
Secondary | Number of Eyes With Vitreous Hemorrhage | Count of eyes with vitreous hemorrhage as an immediate complication of injection. | During 24 weeks of follow-up | |
Secondary | Number of Eyes With Retinal Tear or Detachment | Count of eyes with retinal tears or detachments during the course of follow-up. | During 24 weeks of follow-up | |
Secondary | Number of Eyes With Endophthalmitis | Count of eyes with an occurrence of endophthalmitis | During 24 weeks of folllow-ip | |
Secondary | Cumulative Proportion of Eyes With Severe Vision Loss | Cumulative proportion of eyes with uveitic macular edema who experience severe vision loss (>= 15 standard letters) during the 24 weeks of follow-up. | During 24 weeks of follow-up | |
Secondary | Cumulative Proportion of Eyes With an IOP Elevation of >=10 mm Hg Over Baseline | Cumulative proportion of eyes with uveitic macular edema that experience an IOP elevation of >=10 mm Hg higher than the baseline level during 24 weeks of follow-up. | During 24 weeks of follow-up | |
Secondary | Cumulative Proportion of Eyes With an IOP Elevation >=24 mm Hg | Cumulative proportion of eyes with uveitic macular edema that experience elevated IOP to >=24 mm Hg during 24 weeks of follow-up. | During 24 weeks of follow-up | |
Secondary | Cumulative Proportion of Eyes With an IOP Elevation >=30 mm Hg | Cumulative proportion of eyes with uveitic macular edema that experience elevated IOP to >=30 mm Hg during 24 weeks of follow-up. | During 24 weeks of follow-up |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04292912 -
A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of GSK2798745 in Participants With Diabetic Macular Edema
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05976139 -
Micropulsed Laser in Patients With Macular Oedema in Retinal Dystrophies
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03660371 -
ILM Peeling in PDR Patients Undergoing PPV for VH
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03660345 -
PPV With Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Treatment-Naïve DME
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01660802 -
Safety and Efficacy Study of Dexamethasone in the Treatment of Patients With Macular Edema Following Retinal Vein Occlusion (RVO)
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01908816 -
An Open-label Extended Clinical Protocol of Ranibizumab to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy in Rare VEGF Driven Ocular Diseases.
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04592419 -
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Durability, and Safety of KSI-301 Compared to Aflibercept in Patients With Macular Edema Due to Retinal Vein Occlusion (RVO)
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02867735 -
A Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamic Activity of Intravitreal LKA651 in Patients With Macular Edema
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT02623673 -
Simultaneous Therapy With Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant and Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Macular Edema
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01946399 -
Ozurdex Implant for Macular Edema After Treatment Failure With Anti-VEGF
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01428388 -
Bevacizumab Versus Ranibizumab in Treatment of Macular Edema From Vein Occlusion
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01231633 -
Comparison of Initial Ozurdex (Dexamethasone Implant) to Avastin (Bevacizumab) for Treatment of Macular Edema Caused by Central Retinal Vein Occlusion (CRVO)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT01023113 -
To Compare Visual Field Impairment in Conventional Double Frequency Nd: YAG Panretinal Photocoagulation With PASCAL Panretinal Photocoagulation
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT00969293 -
Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of a Single Administration of FOV2302 (Ecallantide) in Patients With Macular Edema Associated With Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00970957 -
Safety and Effectiveness of Bevacizumab Intravitreal Injections in the Treatment of Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT00918554 -
Efficacy Study of Methotrexate to Treat Sarcoid-associated Uveitis
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00476593 -
Retinal OCT and (mfERG) Related to Age, Sex, and the Use of Anti-inflammatory Medications
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00411970 -
20- Versus 23- Gauge System for Pars Plana Vitrectomy
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00668239 -
Diffuse Diabetic Maculopathy With Intravitreal Triamcinolone or Laser
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01939691 -
Macular Edema Nepafenac vs. Difluprednate Uveitis Trial
|
Phase 4 |