Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02374060
Other study ID # IRB00006139
Secondary ID 1U10EY024527-01
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received
Last updated
Start date June 16, 2015
Est. completion date January 4, 2018

Study information

Verified date May 2018
Source JHSPH Center for Clinical Trials
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

To evaluate the relative efficacy of three commonly utilized regional corticosteroids for the regional treatment of uveitic macular edema: periocular triamcinolone acetonide; intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide; intravitreal dexamethasone implant. The primary efficacy measure will be percent change in central subfield thickness as measured by OCT at 8 weeks. Participants will continue in the study for 24 weeks in order to evaluate relative effects of the 3 treatment strategies on the duration of treatment effects, requirement for additional injections, and adverse effects.

Note: The planned sample size for the POINT Trial was 267 subjects. On 17 July 2017, with 192 subjects enrolled, the Data and Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC) reviewed the planned interim analysis and recommended that the goals of the trial could be accomplished by completing follow-up of enrolled subjects without the recruitment of additional subjects. Per the DSMC recommendations, recruitment was suspended and follow-up of enrolled subjects was completed according to the protocol.


Description:

Macular edema is the most common structural complication and leading cause of visual loss in patients with uveitis. Regional injections of corticosteroids are the most frequently used treatments specifically for uveitic macular edema but there is a lack of high quality evidence to guide choice of drug (e.g., triamcinolone acetonide, dexamethasone) and route of administration (e.g. periocular, intravitreal). The question of how to approach regional treatment of uveitic macular edema is a key question for ophthalmologists treating these patients. The Periocular and Intravitreal Corticosteroids for Uveitic Macular Edema (POINT) Trial is a randomized trial designed to compare the relative efficacy of three regional corticosteroids commonly utilized for the initial regional treatment of uveitic macular edema, periocular triamcinolone (Kenalog® , Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ), intravitreal triamcinolone (Triesence™, Alcon Pharmaceuticals, Fort Worth, TX), and the intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex®, Allergan, Irvine CA) will be conducted by the MUST Research Group clinical centers throughout the U.S. and one each in Australia and the UK. After signing informed consent and undergoing eligibility evaluation, eligible patients will be randomized to one of the three study treatments to be administered at the first study visit. Randomization is by participant, if both eyes meet eligibility requirements then both eyes receive assigned treatment. The design outcome is the percent change in central subfield macular thickness on OCT from baseline to the 8 week visit. After assessment of the primary outcome at 8 weeks, second injections and best medical judgment will be used if macular edema has not improved as follows:

Eye(s) meeting trial eligibility criteria receive initial injection of assigned treatment at P01 visit.

Second injection of assigned treatment permitted at 8 week visit for periocular triamcinolone and intravitreal triamcinolone and at 12 week visit for intravitreal dexamethasone if

- Eye does not meet the improvement definition (a 20% decrease in central subfield thickness of the macula) or

- Eye has a normal central subfield thickness but has cystoid spaces in the 1 mm central subfield or

- ME is worse after initial improvement

And the following repeat injection criterion are met:

• IOP of ≤21 or mm Hg and treatment with ≤3 IOP-lowering agents;

Eyes demonstrating no improvement or worsening of ME as measured by the central submacular thickness on OCT (at week 12 for periocular and intravitreal triamcinolone arms and at week 20 for intravitreal dexamethasone arm) are considered primary treatment non-responders.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 192
Est. completion date January 4, 2018
Est. primary completion date August 30, 2017
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

Eye level inclusion criteria - at least one eye must meet all of the following conditions:

- Non-infectious anterior, intermediate, posterior or panuveitis; either active or inactive uveitis is acceptable;

- Macular edema (ME) defined as the presence of central subfield macular thickness greater than the normal range for the OCT machine being used, regardless of the presence of cysts, as assessed by study ophthalmologist;

- Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) 5/200 or better;

- Baseline intraocular pressure > 5 mm Hg and = 21 mm Hg (current use of 3 or fewer intraocular pressure-lowering medications and/or prior glaucoma surgery are acceptable);

- Baseline fluorescein angiogram that is gradable for leakage in the central subfield

- Pupillary dilation sufficient to allow OCT testing.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patient level exclusion criteria:

-History of infectious uveitis, or of scleritis, keratitis, or infectious endophthalmitis in either eye;

History of central serous retinopathy in either eye;

- For women of childbearing potential: pregnancy, breastfeeding, or a positive pregnancy test; unwilling to practice an adequate birth control method (abstinence, combination barrier and spermicide, or hormonal) for duration of trial;

- Use of oral acetazolamide or other systemic carbonic anhydrase inhibitor at baseline;

- Oral prednisone dose > 10 mg per day (or of an alternative corticosteroid at a dose higher than that equipotent to prednisone 10 mg per day) OR oral prednisone dose = 10 mg per day that has not been stable for at least 4 weeks(note that if patient is off of oral prednisone at baseline (P01 visit), dose stability requirement for past 4 weeks does not apply);

- Systemic immunosuppressive drug therapy that has not been stable for at least 4 weeks;

- Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any component of the study drugs;

Eye level exclusion criteria - at least one eye that meets all inclusion criteria cannot have any of the following conditions:

- History of severe glaucoma as defined by optic nerve damage (cup/disc ratio of = 0.9 or any notching of optic nerve to the rim);

- Media opacity causing inability to assess fundus or perform OCT;

- Presence of an epiretinal membrane noted clinically or by OCT that per the judgment of study ophthalmologist may be significant enough to limit improvement of ME (i.e., causing substantial wrinkling of the retinal surface)81;

- Torn or ruptured posterior lens capsule;

- Presence of silicone oil;

- Periocular or intravitreal corticosteroid injection in past 8 weeks;

- Injection of dexamethasone intravitreal implant in past 12 weeks;

- Placement of fluocinolone acetonide implant (Retisert) in past 3 years;

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Periocular triamcinolone 40 mg
Periocular triamcinolone acetonide, 40 mg injection may be given either by posterior sub-Tenon's approach or by the orbital floor approach, as both appear to have similar efficacy; the approach to the periocular injection will be recorded for analysis if needed.
Intravitreal triamcinolone 4 mg
Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide, 4 mg injection procedures should be carried out under controlled aseptic conditions which include the use of sterile gloves and a sterile eyelid speculum (or equivalent). Adequate anesthesia and a broad-spectrum microbicide such as betadine, applied to the periocular skin, eyelid and ocular surface are required prior to an intravitreal injection.
Dexamethasone intravitreal implant
• Standard preparation as described for intravitreal injections.

Locations

Country Name City State
Australia Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital East Melbourne
Canada McGill University Montreal Quebec
United Kingdom Moorfields Eye Hospital London
United States Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan
United States Emory University Atlanta Georgia
United States Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland
United States National Eye Institute, NIH Bethesda Maryland
United States Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Boston Massachusetts
United States Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston Boston Massachusetts
United States Northwestern University Chicago Illinois
United States Rush University Medical Center Chicago Illinois
United States Duke Eye Center, Duke University Durham North Carolina
United States Vitreoretinal Consultants Houston Texas
United States University of Iowa Iowa City Iowa
United States Jules Stein Eye Institute, UCLA Los Angeles California
United States Anne Bates Leach Eye Hospital, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami Florida
United States New York Eye and Ear Infirmary New York New York
United States Scheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania
United States Wills Eye Hospital Philadelphia Pennsylvania
United States Unniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
United States MAYO Clinic Rochester Minnesota
United States Washington University School of Medicine Saint Louis Missouri
United States John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah
United States University of California, San Francisco San Francisco California
United States University of Washington Seattle Washington
United States University of South Florida Tampa Florida

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
JHSPH Center for Clinical Trials National Eye Institute (NEI)

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Australia,  Canada,  United Kingdom, 

References & Publications (1)

Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment Trial Research Group; Writing Committee:, Thorne JE, Sugar EA, Holbrook JT, Burke AE, Altaweel MM, Vitale AT, Acharya NR, Kempen JH, Jabs DA. Periocular Triamcinolone vs. Intravitreal Triamcinolone vs. Intravitreal De — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Proportion of Baseline Central Subfield Thickness Observed at 8 Weeks The primary outcome is the change in central subfield thickness from baseline to 8 weeks measured on a relative scale as the the proportion of the baseline central subfield thickness. Values less than 1 indicate a decrease in retinal thickness with lower values indicating greater decreases. Smaller values are better.
The time point of 8 weeks was chosen for assessment of the primary outcome because it encompasses the window for maximum benefit for all three treatment strategies. Retinal thickness was evaluated using masked assessments of OCT images.
At baseline and 8 weeks
Secondary Proportion of Baseline Central Subfield Thickness Observed at 24 Weeks The primary outcome is the change in central subfield thickness from baseline to 24 weeks measured on a relative scale as the the proportion of the baseline central subfield thickness. Values less than 1 indicate a decrease in retinal thickness with lower values indicating greater decreases. Smaller values are better.The time point of 24 weeks was chosen to evaluate the duration of response and the need for additional injections.Retinal thickness was evaluated using masked assessments of OCT images. At baseline and the 24 week visit
Secondary Proportion of Eyes With >= 20% Reduction in Macular Thickness (or Normalization Even if <20% Reduction) at 8 Weeks Proportion of eyes with >=20% reduction in macular thickness (or normalization of macular thickness even if there is <20% reduction) at 8 weeks. Over 8 weeks of follow-up
Secondary Proportion of Eyes With >= 20% Reduction in Macular Thickness (or Normalization Even if <20% Reduction) at 24 Weeks Proportion of eyes with >=20% reduction in macular thickness (or normalization of macular thickness even if there is <20% reduction) at 24 weeks Over 24 weeks of follow-up
Secondary Proportion of Eyes With Resolution of Macular Edema at 8 Weeks Proportion of eyes with resolution of macular edema defined as normalization of the macular thickness (i.e., < 260 um on the standardized scale) at 8 weeks. The greater the proportion the more eyes achieved resolution of macular edema. Over 8 weeks of follow-up
Secondary Proportion of Eyes With Resolution of Macular Edema at 24 Weeks Proportion of eyes with resolution of macular edema defined as normalization of the macular thickness (i.e., <260 um on the standard scale) at 24 weeks. Over 24 weeks of follow-up
Secondary Change in Best-corrected Visual Acuity at 8 Weeks Mean change in best-corrected visual acuity from baseline to 8 weeks. Participants' visual acuity was measured by certified examiners with best refractive correction in place.Participants were challenged with reading letters on lines of the standard ETDRS eye chart (5 letters per line). Lines became smaller as participants progressed from the top to the bottom of the chart. Participants read down the chart until no more meaningful readings could be made and were scored by how many letters could be correctly identified. More letters read is associated with higher visual acuity. Over 8 weeks of follow-up
Secondary Change in Best-corrected Visual Acuity at 24 Weeks Mean change in best-corrected visual acuity from baseline to 24 weeks. Participants' visual acuity was measured by certified examiners with best refractive correction in place.Participants were challenged with reading letters on lines of the standard ETDRS eye chart (5 letters per line). Lines became smaller as participants progressed from the top to the bottom of the chart. Participants read down the chart until no more meaningful readings could be made and were scored by how many letters could be correctly identified. More letters read is associated with higher visual acuity. Over 24 weeks of follow-up
Secondary Number of Eyes With Vitreous Hemorrhage Count of eyes with vitreous hemorrhage as an immediate complication of injection. During 24 weeks of follow-up
Secondary Number of Eyes With Retinal Tear or Detachment Count of eyes with retinal tears or detachments during the course of follow-up. During 24 weeks of follow-up
Secondary Number of Eyes With Endophthalmitis Count of eyes with an occurrence of endophthalmitis During 24 weeks of folllow-ip
Secondary Cumulative Proportion of Eyes With Severe Vision Loss Cumulative proportion of eyes with uveitic macular edema who experience severe vision loss (>= 15 standard letters) during the 24 weeks of follow-up. During 24 weeks of follow-up
Secondary Cumulative Proportion of Eyes With an IOP Elevation of >=10 mm Hg Over Baseline Cumulative proportion of eyes with uveitic macular edema that experience an IOP elevation of >=10 mm Hg higher than the baseline level during 24 weeks of follow-up. During 24 weeks of follow-up
Secondary Cumulative Proportion of Eyes With an IOP Elevation >=24 mm Hg Cumulative proportion of eyes with uveitic macular edema that experience elevated IOP to >=24 mm Hg during 24 weeks of follow-up. During 24 weeks of follow-up
Secondary Cumulative Proportion of Eyes With an IOP Elevation >=30 mm Hg Cumulative proportion of eyes with uveitic macular edema that experience elevated IOP to >=30 mm Hg during 24 weeks of follow-up. During 24 weeks of follow-up
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04292912 - A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of GSK2798745 in Participants With Diabetic Macular Edema Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05976139 - Micropulsed Laser in Patients With Macular Oedema in Retinal Dystrophies N/A
Completed NCT03660371 - ILM Peeling in PDR Patients Undergoing PPV for VH N/A
Completed NCT03660345 - PPV With Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Treatment-Naïve DME Phase 3
Completed NCT01660802 - Safety and Efficacy Study of Dexamethasone in the Treatment of Patients With Macular Edema Following Retinal Vein Occlusion (RVO) Phase 3
Completed NCT01908816 - An Open-label Extended Clinical Protocol of Ranibizumab to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy in Rare VEGF Driven Ocular Diseases. Phase 3
Completed NCT04592419 - A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Durability, and Safety of KSI-301 Compared to Aflibercept in Patients With Macular Edema Due to Retinal Vein Occlusion (RVO) Phase 3
Completed NCT02867735 - A Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamic Activity of Intravitreal LKA651 in Patients With Macular Edema Phase 1
Completed NCT02623673 - Simultaneous Therapy With Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant and Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Macular Edema N/A
Terminated NCT01946399 - Ozurdex Implant for Macular Edema After Treatment Failure With Anti-VEGF N/A
Completed NCT01428388 - Bevacizumab Versus Ranibizumab in Treatment of Macular Edema From Vein Occlusion N/A
Completed NCT01231633 - Comparison of Initial Ozurdex (Dexamethasone Implant) to Avastin (Bevacizumab) for Treatment of Macular Edema Caused by Central Retinal Vein Occlusion (CRVO) N/A
Recruiting NCT01023113 - To Compare Visual Field Impairment in Conventional Double Frequency Nd: YAG Panretinal Photocoagulation With PASCAL Panretinal Photocoagulation N/A
Terminated NCT00969293 - Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of a Single Administration of FOV2302 (Ecallantide) in Patients With Macular Edema Associated With Central Retinal Vein Occlusion Phase 1
Completed NCT00970957 - Safety and Effectiveness of Bevacizumab Intravitreal Injections in the Treatment of Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion Phase 3
Terminated NCT00918554 - Efficacy Study of Methotrexate to Treat Sarcoid-associated Uveitis Phase 4
Completed NCT00476593 - Retinal OCT and (mfERG) Related to Age, Sex, and the Use of Anti-inflammatory Medications N/A
Completed NCT00411970 - 20- Versus 23- Gauge System for Pars Plana Vitrectomy Phase 4
Completed NCT00668239 - Diffuse Diabetic Maculopathy With Intravitreal Triamcinolone or Laser N/A
Terminated NCT01939691 - Macular Edema Nepafenac vs. Difluprednate Uveitis Trial Phase 4