View clinical trials related to Lymphoma, Follicular.
Filter by:Primary Objective: To evaluate objective response rate (ORR) in adult patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (r/r FL) grade 1-3a who are treated with currently available therapies in the real-world setting according to Lugano classification (Cheson, 2014) of malignant lymphoma and as assessed by independent central review. Secondary Objectives: To evaluate the following outcomes in adult patients with r/r FL grade 1-3a who are treated with currently available systemic therapies in the real-world setting: 1. Objective response rate (ORR) according to the Lugano classification and as assessed by treating physician evaluation 2. Complete response (CR) rate according to the Lugano classification and as assessed by: - Independent central review, and - Treating physician evaluation 3. Progression-free survival (PFS) according to the Lugano classification and as assessed by: - Independent central review, and - Treating physician evaluation 4. Overall survival (OS) 5. Duration of response (DOR) according to the Lugano classification and as assessed by: - Independent central review, and - Treating physician evaluation 6. Disease control rate (DCR) according to the Lugano classification and as assessed by: - Independent central review, and - Treating physician evaluation 7. Time to next treatment (TTNT) 8. Histological transformation (HT)
This study will evaluate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of mosunetuzumab in combination with tiragolumab, with or without atezolizumab, in participants with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or follicular lymphoma (FL) who have received at least two previous lines of systemic therapy.
The anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, rituximab (R) and obinutuzumab (G), are used as standard maintenance therapy every 2 months for 2 to 3 years in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). This treatment is associated with profound and prolonged B lymphopenia, hypogammaglobulinemia and increased infections. Severe forms of COVID-19 on Rituximab with prolonged carriage of the virus have been reported due to significant impairment of humoral immunity in this context of maintenance therapy. Therefore, during the COVID-19 epidemic, clinicians are faced with the question of whether to discontinue maintenance therapy or continue treatment. However, the half-life of rituximab is 29 days and lymphopenia continues for up to 9-12 months after stopping injections. Therefore, it is not clear that discontinuation of maintenance therapy will alter the risk of severe SARS-CoV-2. However, post-vaccination immunization against SARS-CoV-2 by an mRNA vaccine is not known in this context of prolonged treatment with rituximab or obinutuzumab. It is however well established that post-vaccination responses against diphtheria, tetanus, pneumococcus, HBV, or influenza in particular are altered after anti-CD20 antibodies. If the humoral response is crucial in the post-vaccination response, it is also suggested that the preservation of innate immunity and the CD8 response, unaltered by anti-CD20, could also play an important role in the post-vaccination response and virus clearance. The aim of our study is to evaluate the humoral and post-vaccination T-cell response based on serological data and T-cell production of interferon gamma in response to SARS-CoV-2 specific antigens (Elispot interferon gamma) in this group of patients treated for lymphoma with a long-term anti-CD20 antibody.
The development of new diagnostic tools and targeted therapy have significantly improved the management of non-Hodgkin's malignant lymphomas and thus their long-term prognosis. However, in the study of improved patient management, survival is not the only measurable indicator and preservation of quality of life is an essential component. In addition, there is little existing data regarding the determinants of quality of life in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or follicular lymphoma (FL) in the general population in France.
This study focuses on finding a safe and tolerable dose for a three-drug regimen that combines venetoclax (Venclexta Ⓡ), CC-486 (also known as oral azacitidine) and obinutuzumab (Gazyva Ⓡ) to treat cancer participants who have minimally pretreated follicular lymphoma and have experienced disease progression despite trying previous cancer therapies. If a safe and tolerable drug dose can be found in the first phase of the study, doctors leading the study will launch a second phase of the study within an expansion cohort. Participants in this expansion cohort will receive the dose established in the first phase of the study to determine the efficacy of the regimen/ established dose. Participants in the expansion cohort will also receive the same study drugs from the first phase of the study, but in a different order/combination (first pairing the two oral drugs, CC-486 and venetoclax, then adding the third drug, obinutuzumab to treatment). The end goal of this research is to establish a new chemotherapy-sparing treatment option for patients with follicular lymphoma that is just as effective (or better) than current standard of care options.
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of parsaclisib in Japanese participants with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma
The Drug Use Examination (DUE) is planned and designed for the safety evaluation of new indications after the approval of a new drug in Korea. This DUE is a non-interventional, observational and post-marketing surveillance, which will be conducted by collecting the safety information of REVLIMID® for new indications in routine clinical practice in Korea. Six-Hundred (600) adult patients, who start with REVLIMID® treatment based on the approved local package insert (PI) of REVLIMID® during routine clinical practice in Korea and have indications noted below. 1. Patients with transfusion-dependent anemia due to IPSS low- or intermediate-1-risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes associated with a deletion 5q cytogenetic abnormality (del [5q] MDS) 2. Patients with mantle cell lymphoma who have received at least one prior therapy (rrMCL) 3. Previously treated follicular lymphoma (FL), in combination with rituximab (an anti-CD20 antibody)
The primary objective of the current study is to demonstrate the equivalent efficacy of rituximab (DRL_RI) and MabThera® in subjects with Low Tumor Burden Follicular Lymphoma (LTB-FL). Also evaluated by Pharmacokinetic, safety, and immunogenicity assessment between a proposed biosimilar (DRL_RI) and the RMP, as an component of clinical study program, and collectively providing the evidence of biosimilarity. The study will compare the safety and efficacy of DRL_RI vs MabThera in patients with Low Tumor Burden Follicular Lymphoma (LTB-FL). The primary objective is to establish comparative efficacy as measured by ORR up to week 28
This phase I trial studies the side effects and best dose of duvelisib when given together with nivolumab in treating patients with Richter syndrome or transformed follicular lymphoma. Duvelisib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as nivolumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Giving duvelisib and nivolumab may work better in treating patients with Richter syndrome or transformed follicular lymphoma compared to giving duvelisib or nivolumab alone.
This open-label, single arm study will evaluate the safety of obinutuzumab administered as a short duration infusion (SDI; target 90-minute infusion) during cycle 2 and from cycle 2 onwards in combination with chemotherapy in participants with previously untreated advanced follicular lymphoma (FL). The study has two phases: in the first phase, participants will receive the first cycle of obinutuzumab-based chemotherapy (G-chemo) induction therapy as usual with the first three infusions of obinutuzumab (1000 mg) administered at the regular infusion rate on Day 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 1. Phase 2 starts when participants who do not experience any Grade ≥ 3 infusion related reactions during the first cycle receive their first obintuzumab infusion given at the faster infusion rate in Cycle 2. For Cycle 2, Day 1 and all other following infusions (including maintenance), obinutuzumab will be administered at a faster infusion of 90-minute SDI, as long as the participant does not experience any Grade ≥ 3 infusion related reactions. The investigator is free to choose the chemotherapy for each participant (bendamustine, CHOP [cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone/prednisolone/methylprednisolone], or CVP [cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone/prednisolone/methylprednisolone]). The total number of cycles of G-chemo induction therapy and the cycles length depends on the chemotherapy chosen for each participant.