Clinical Trials Logo

Lymphadenopathy clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Lymphadenopathy.

Filter by:
  • Terminated  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT04105465 Terminated - Vulvar Cancer Clinical Trials

Study to Evaluate the Role of PlasmaJet in Patients Undergoing Groin Node Dissection for Vulval Cancer

Start date: July 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Surgery for vulvar cancer involves removal of the central tumour as well as groin node dissection as indicated depending on the stage of tumour. Groin node dissection is associated with significant complications including lymphorrea, lymphocyst formation, wound breakdown as well as long term complications including lymphedema. This study has been designed with each patient acting as their own control to investigate if using the PlasmaJet during surgery is associated with a reduction in the above mentioned complications.

NCT ID: NCT03829618 Terminated - Pneumonia Clinical Trials

Lidocaine Administration During Flexible Bronchoscopy and Endobronchial Ultrasound

Start date: April 1, 2019
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to assess if there is decrease in cough during flexible bronchoscopy and endobronchial ultrasound when different modes of lidocaine administration are used. The modes of administration being evaluated are topical, nebulized and atomized.

NCT ID: NCT03172832 Terminated - Cholangiocarcinoma Clinical Trials

A Trial of Percutaneous vs. Endoscopic Drainage of Suspected Klatskin Tumors

INTERCPT
Start date: August 20, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The optimal approach to the drainage of malignant obstruction at the biliary hilum remains uncertain. This is a randomized comparative effectiveness study of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) vs. endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) as the first intervention in patients with cholestasis due to suspected malignant hilar obstruction.

NCT ID: NCT02872831 Terminated - Pancreatic Cancer Clinical Trials

Beacon BNX™ Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Needle vs SharkCore™ Needle

Start date: July 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The primary objective of this proposed prospective randomized, multi-center study is to evaluate the capability of the new 22G SharkCore™ needle to obtain tissue specimens and to compare its performance against the standard 22G BNX Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine needle aspiration (Beacon Endoscopic, Newton, MA) needle in the evaluation of solid mass lesions in the pancreas and gastrointestinal tract. The secondary objective is to determine the ability of the 22G SharkCore™ needle system to yield histologic tissue.

NCT ID: NCT01720745 Terminated - Cancer Clinical Trials

Comparison of "Wet Suction" Technique to Contemporary "Dry Suction" Technique Using a 22 Gauge Needle for EUS FNA

Start date: October 2012
Phase:
Study type: Observational

ROLE OF SUCTION IN EUS-FNA: Current suction technique involves suctioning the aspirate into the needle that has an air column. The needle is not flushed with any liquid prior to passing into the desired solid lesion. Suction is applied when the needle is within the lesion leading to aspiration of tissue into the needle. This is the standard technique and some have done with and without the stylet. There are some data that favor non use of a stylet. WET SCTION TECHNIQUE: Wet suction technique involves flushing the needle with 1-2 cc of saline to replace the column of air with saline. The needle is now passed into the desired lesion. Suction is applied at maximal strength and needle moved back and forth within the lesion to obtain as aspirate. Drops of saline can be seen moving into the suction syringe as the aspirate moves into the needle. Needle is now withdrawn and aspirate delivered on to a slide by using a stylet and or flushing air into the needle with a syringe. HYPOTHESIS The effect of suction for the purpose of aspirating cells and / or tissue during fine needle biopsy may be significantly improved by filling the column of the needle with a less compressible fluid. The volume of vacuum being pulled may be negatively impacted by the expansion of air within the needle. Replacing the air with sterile saline may thus improve the suction transferred to the needle tip by ensuring that the full volume of the vacuum syringe is transferred to the distal tip of the needle. This effect would be most pronounced in larger gauge needles which would have a larger internal volume. An additional benefit of filling the needle with saline prior to aspiration is the speed of the pressure transfer. The theory is that the air in the needle may absorb some of the force of the sudden application of vacuum. A column of saline in the needle may increase the velocity of the pressure transfer providing more tissue and less blood.