View clinical trials related to Luteal Phase Support.
Filter by:The aim of the study is to compare the pregnancy rate between women treated with Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone (GnRH) agonist together with Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) and standard luteal support with progesterone following transfer of frozen embryos in in-vitro-fertilization (IVF) natural cycles.
Luteal phase deficiency (LPD) accounts for most failures of assistant artificial reproduction (ART) and early pregnancy loss for patients with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (IHH). Luteal phase support (LPS) is one of the indispensable interventions in ART treatments for IHH patients, which includes progestin, estrogen, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), and GnRH agonists (GnRHa). We aim to verify additional hCG injection 48 hours following routine hCG trigger and ovulation for LPS on the basis of supplementation of estrogen and dydrogesterone could improve clinical pregnancy rate, cumulative pregnancy rate, live birth rate and the prevalence of early pregnancy loss and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) by an open labeled, prospective, and randomized clinical trial (RCT) in IHH patients in a single center.
Luteal phase support in "in vitro fertilization" (IVF) cycles has been shown to improve pregnancy rates and became a standard of treatment, and progesterone is the first choice considering its safety profile and effectiveness. There are many studies demonstrating that vaginal progesterone is equally efficacious and better tolerated compared to intramuscular progesterone for luteal phase support in IVF cycles. Conversely, although different studies showed that subcutaneous progesterone is equally efficacious compared to vaginal progesterone, patient use satisfaction and compliance were less studied with few evidences are available, that may guide the choice of vaginal progesterone instead of subcutaneous progesterone and other way around. Considering the paucity of published data about the patient's preference and use satisfaction about subcutaneous progesterone, the investigators will conduct a prospective randomized study aimed to compared adverse effects rates, impact on quality of life, use satisfaction and administration preference in women undergoing luteal phase support with vaginal progesterone versus subcutaneous progesterone during IVF cycles, that may guide the choice for luteal phase support in IVF cycles.